Defined the Lebesgue integral.

This commit is contained in:
Bokuan Li
2026-01-25 14:10:21 -05:00
parent 4e451700d2
commit f9d7a448bf
3 changed files with 139 additions and 12 deletions

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,126 @@
\section{Integration of Complex-Valued Functions}
\label{section:lebesgue-complex}
\begin{definition}[Integrable]
\label{definition:lebesgue-integrable}
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space and $f: X \to \complex$ be a $(\cm, \cb_\complex)$-measurable function, then $f$ is \textbf{integrable} if
\[
\int \abs{f} d\mu < \infty
\]
The set
\[
\mathcal{L}^1(X, \cm, \mu; \complex) = \mathcal{L}^1(X, \cm, \mu) = \mathcal{L}^1(X; \complex) = \mathcal{L}^1(X) = \mathcal{L}^1(\mu; \complex) = \mathcal{L}^1(\mu)
\]
is the vector space of \textbf{$\mu$-integrable functions} on $X$.
\end{definition}
\begin{proof}
Let $f, g \in \mathcal{L}^1(X)$ and $\lambda \in \complex$, then
\[
\int \abs{\lambda f + g}d\mu \le \int \abs{\lambda} \abs{f} + \abs{g}d\mu = \lambda \int \abs{f}d\mu + \int \abs{g}d\mu
\]
by \ref{proposition:lebesgue-non-negative-properties}.
\end{proof}
\begin{definition}[Positive and Negative Parts]
\label{definition:positive-negative-parts}
Let $X$ be a set and $f: X \to \real$ be a function, then
\[
f^+ = \max(f, 0) \quad f^- = -\min(f, 0)
\]
are the \textbf{positive} and \textbf{negative} parts of $f$, and $f = f^+ - f^-$.
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}[Integral]
\label{definition:lebesgue-complex}
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space and $f \in \mathcal{L}^1(X)$. If $f$ is $\real$-valued, then
\[
\int f d\mu = \int f^+ d\mu - \int f^- d\mu
\]
is the \textbf{integral} of $f$. If $f$ is $\complex$-valued, then
\[
\int f d\mu = \int \text{Re}(f)d\mu + i\int \text{Im}(f)d\mu
\]
is the \textbf{integral} of $f$.
\end{definition}
\begin{proposition}[{{\cite[Proposition 2.21, 2.22]{Folland}}}]
\label{proposition:lebesgue-integral-properties}
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space, then the integral is a linear functional on $\mathcal{L}^1(X)$ such that for any $f \in \mathcal{L}^1(X)$, $\abs{\int f d\mu} \le \int \abs{f}d\mu$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Let $f, g \in \mathcal{L}^1(X)$ and $\lambda \in \complex$. First suppose that $f, g$ are $\real$-valued and $\lambda \in \real$. In which case,
\[
\int \lambda f d\mu = \int (\lambda f)^+ d\mu - \int (\lambda f)^- d\mu
= \begin{cases}
\lambda\int f^+ d\mu - \lambda\int f^- d\mu &\lambda \ge 0 \\
-\lambda\int f^- d\mu + \lambda\int f^+ d\mu &\lambda < 0
\end{cases}
\]
by \ref{proposition:lebesgue-non-negative-properties}, so $\int \lambda f d\mu = \lambda \int f d\mu$.
Let $h = f + g$, then $h = h^+ - h^- = f^+ + g^+ - f^- - g^-$, so
\begin{align*}
h^+ + f^- + g^- &= h^- + f^+ + g^+ \\
\int h^+d\mu + \int f^- d\mu + \int g^-d\mu &= \int h^- d\mu + \int f^+ d\mu + \int g^+ d\mu \\
\int h^+ d\mu - \int h^- d\mu &= \int f^+ d\mu - \int f^- d\mu + \int g^+ d\mu - \int g^- d\mu \\
&= \int f d\mu + \int g d\mu
\end{align*}
by \ref{proposition:lebesgue-non-negative-properties}, so $\int f + g d\mu = \int f d\mu + \int g d\mu$.
Now suppose that $f, g$ are $\complex$-valued and $\lambda = \alpha + \beta i \in \complex$ with $\alpha, \beta \in \real$, then
\begin{align*}
\int (\alpha f)d\mu &= \int \text{Re}(\lambda f)d\mu + i\int \text{Im}(\lambda f)d\mu \\
&= \int \alpha \text{Re}(f) - \beta \text{Im}(f)d\mu + i\int \beta\text{Re}(f) + \alpha \text{Im}(f)d\mu \\
&= \alpha \braks{\int \text{Re}(f)d\mu + i\int \text{Im}(f)}d\mu + i\beta \braks{\int \text{Re}(f)d\mu + i\int \text{Im}(f)}d\mu \\
&= \lambda \int f d\mu
\end{align*}
and
\begin{align*}
\int f + g d\mu &= \int \text{Re}(f + g)d\mu + i\int \text{Im}(f + g)d\mu \\
&= \int \text{Re}(f)d\mu + i\int\text{Im}(f)d\mu + \int \text{Re}(g)d\mu + i\int \text{Im}(g)d\mu \\
&= \int f d\mu + \int g d\mu
\end{align*}
so the integral is a linear functional on $\mathcal{L}^1(X)$.
Finally, if $f$ is $\real$-valued, then
\[
\int f = \int f^+ d\mu - \int f^-d\mu \le \int f^+ + \int f^-d\mu = \int \abs{f}d\mu
\]
and if $f$ is $\complex$-valued and $\alpha = \ol{\sgn(\int f d\mu)}$, then
\begin{align*}
\abs{\int f d\mu} &= \alpha \int f d\mu = \int \alpha f \\
&= \text{Re}\paren{\int \alpha f d\mu} = \int \text{Re}(\alpha f)d\mu \\
&\le \int \abs{\text{Re}(\alpha f)}d\mu \le \int \abs{\alpha f}d\mu = \int \abs{f}d\mu
\end{align*}
so $\abs{\int f d\mu} \le \int \abs{f}d\mu$.
\end{proof}
\begin{remark}
\label{remark:integral-lack-simple}
The construction of the Lebesgue integral using positive/negative and real/imaginary parts, and the deduction of properties from this definition both appear cumbersome. This comes from the lack of usage of its linearity on integrable simple functions. A more functional analytic approach will use this linearity and the density of simple functions to construct the integral. This is the route through which the Bochner integral will be presented.
\end{remark}
\begin{theorem}[Dominated Convergence Theorem {{\cite[Theorem 2.24]{Folland}}}]
\label{theorem:dct}
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space, $\seq{f_n} \subset \mathcal{L}^1(X)$, and $f:X \to \complex$ such that
\begin{enumerate}
\item $f_n \to f$ pointwise.
\item There exists $g \in \mathcal{L}^1(X)$ such that $\abs{f_n} \le \abs{g}$ for all $n \in \natp$.
\end{enumerate}
then $\int fd\mu = \limv{n}\int f_n d\mu$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
By (1) and (2), $f$ is measurable with $\int \abs{f}d\mu \le \int \abs{g}d\mu < \infty$, so $f \in \mathcal{L}^1(X)$. Now, since $g + f, g - f \ge 0$, by Fatou's lemma (\ref{lemma:fatou}) and \ref{proposition:lebesgue-integral-properties},
\begin{align*}
\int g d\mu + \int f d\mu &\le \liminf_{n \to \infty}\int g + f_n d\mu = \int g d\mu + \liminf_{n \to \infty}f_n d\mu \\
\int g d\mu - \int f d\mu &\le \liminf_{n \to \infty}\int g - \int f_n d\mu = \int g d\mu - \limsup_{n \to \infty}\int f_n d\mu
\end{align*}
so
\[
\limsup_{n \to \infty}\int f_n d\mu \le \int f d\mu \le \liminf_{n \to \infty}\int f_n d\mu
\]
and $\int f d\mu = \limv{n}\int f_n d\mu$.
\end{proof}

View File

@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@
\input{./src/measure/lebesgue-integral/simple.tex}
\input{./src/measure/lebesgue-integral/non-negative.tex}
\input{./src/measure/lebesgue-integral/complex.tex}

View File

@@ -5,14 +5,14 @@
\label{definition:measurable-non-negative}
Let $(X, \cm)$ be a measure space, then
\[
L^+(X, \cm) = \bracs{f: X \to \real| f \ge 0, f \text{ is } (\cm, \cb_\real) \text{-measurable}}
\mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm) = \bracs{f: X \to \real| f \ge 0, f \text{ is } (\cm, \cb_\real) \text{-measurable}}
\]
is the space of non-negative $\real$-valued measurable functions on $(X, \cm)$.
\end{definition}
\begin{definition}[Integral of Non-Negative Function]
\label{definition:lebesgue-non-negative}
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space and $f \in L^+(X, \cm)$, then
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space and $f \in \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$, then
\[
\int f d\mu = \int f(x)\mu(dx) = \sup\bracs{\int \phi d\mu \bigg | \phi \in \Sigma^+(X, \cm), \phi \le f}
\]
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma:lebesgue-non-negative-strict}
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space and $f \in L^+(X, \cm)$, then
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space and $f \in \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$, then
\[
\int f d\mu = \sup\bracs{\int \phi d\mu \bigg | \phi \in \Sigma^+(X, \cm), \phi|_{\bracs{f > 0}} < f|_{\bracs{f > 0}}, \phi \le f}
\]
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
\begin{theorem}[Monotone Convergence Theorem, {{\cite[Theorem 2.14]{Folland}}}]
\label{theorem:mct}
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space, $\seq{f_n} \subset L^+(X, \cm)$, and $f \in L^+(X, \cm)$ such that $f_n \upto f$ pointwise, then
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space, $\seq{f_n} \subset \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$, and $f \in \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$ such that $f_n \upto f$ pointwise, then
\[
\limv{n}\int f_n d\mu = \int f d\mu
\]
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
\begin{lemma}[Fatou, {{\cite[Lemma 2.18]{Folland}}}]
\label{lemma:fatou}
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space, $\seq{f_n} \subset L^+(X, \cm)$, then
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space, $\seq{f_n} \subset \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$, then
\[
\int \liminf_{n \to \infty}f_n d\mu \le \liminf_{n \to \infty}\int f_nd\mu
\]
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma:lebesgue-simple-monotone}
Let $(X, \cm)$ be a measurable space and $f \in L^+(X, \cm)$, then there exists $\seq{f_n} \subset \Sigma^+(X, \cm)$ such that $f_n \upto f$ pointwise.
Let $(X, \cm)$ be a measurable space and $f \in \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$, then there exists $\seq{f_n} \subset \Sigma^+(X, \cm)$ such that $f_n \upto f$ pointwise.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
By \ref{proposition:measurable-simple-separable-norm}, there exists $\seq{g_n} \subset \Sigma^+(X, \cm)$ such that $0 \le g_n \le f$ for each $n \in \natp$, and $g_n \to f$ pointwise. For each $n \in \natp$, let $f_n = \max_{1 \le k \le n}g_k$, then $f_n \in \Sigma^+(X, \cm)$, $0 \le f_n \le f$, and $f_n \upto f$ pointwise.
@@ -79,12 +79,12 @@
\label{proposition:lebesgue-non-negative-properties}
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space, then
\begin{enumerate}
\item For any $f, g \in L^+(X, \cm)$ and $\alpha \ge 0$, $\int \alpha f + g d\mu = \alpha \int f d\mu + \int g d\mu$.
\item For any $\seq{f_n} \subset L^+(X, \cm)$, $\sum_{n \in \natp}\int f_nd\mu = \int \sum_{n \in \natp}f_n d\mu$.
\item For any $f, g \in L^+(X, \cm)$ with $f \le g$, $\int f d\mu \le \int g d\mu$.
\item For any $f \in L^+(X, \cm)$ with $\int f d\mu < \infty$, $\mu(\bracs{f = \infty}) = 0$.
\item For any $f \in L^+(X, \cm)$ with $\int f d\mu < \infty$, $\bracs{f > 0}$ is $\sigma$-finite.
\item For any $f \in L^+(X, \cm)$ with $\int f d\mu = 0$, $f = 0$ $\mu$-almost everywhere.
\item For any $f, g \in \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$ and $\alpha \ge 0$, $\int \alpha f + g d\mu = \alpha \int f d\mu + \int g d\mu$.
\item For any $\seq{f_n} \subset \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$, $\sum_{n \in \natp}\int f_nd\mu = \int \sum_{n \in \natp}f_n d\mu$.
\item For any $f, g \in \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$ with $f \le g$, $\int f d\mu \le \int g d\mu$.
\item For any $f \in \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$ with $\int f d\mu < \infty$, $\mu(\bracs{f = \infty}) = 0$.
\item For any $f \in \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$ with $\int f d\mu < \infty$, $\bracs{f > 0}$ is $\sigma$-finite.
\item For any $f \in \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$ with $\int f d\mu = 0$, $f = 0$ $\mu$-almost everywhere.
\end{enumerate}
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}