Final revision.

This commit is contained in:
Bokuan Li
2026-09-26 15:29:08 -04:00
parent 2d09d41e75
commit da88b6e1c9
2 changed files with 9 additions and 9 deletions
+8 -8
View File
@@ -56,27 +56,27 @@
&= \ol{\dpn{\pi(f)\eta, \xi}{H}} = \dpn{\xi, \pi(f)\eta}{H} &= \ol{\dpn{\pi(f)\eta, \xi}{H}} = \dpn{\xi, \pi(f)\eta}{H}
\end{align*} \end{align*}
(1, Non-Degenerate): For any $\xi \in H \setminus \bracsn{0}$, since $\pi_0$ is strong-operator continuous, there exists $V \in \cn_G(1)$ such that $\norm{\pi(x)\xi - \xi}_H < \norm{\xi}_H$ for all $x \in V$. In which case, if $f = |V|^{-1}\one_V$\footnote{$|V|$ is the value of the Haar measure at $V$.}, then for any $\eta \in H$, (1, Non-Degenerate): For any $\xi \in H \setminus \bracsn{0}$, since $\pi_0$ is strong-operator continuous, there exists $V \in \cn_G(1)$ such that $\norm{\pi_0(x)\xi - \xi}_H < \norm{\xi}_H$ for all $x \in V$. In which case, if $f = |V|^{-1}\one_V$\footnote{$|V|$ is the value of the Haar measure at $V$.}, then for any $\eta \in H$,
\begin{align*} \begin{align*}
\dpn{\pi(f)\xi - \xi, \eta}{H} &= \frac{1}{|V|}\int_V \dpn{\pi(x)\xi - \xi, \eta}{H} dx \\ \dpn{\pi(f)\xi - \xi, \eta}{H} &= \frac{1}{|V|}\int_V \dpn{\pi_0(x)\xi - \xi, \eta}{H} dx \\
|\dpn{\pi(f)\xi - \xi, \eta}{H}| &\le \frac{1}{|V|}\int_V \norm{\pi(x)\xi - \xi}_H\norm{\eta}_Hdx < \norm{\xi}_H\norm{\eta}_H |\dpn{\pi(f)\xi - \xi, \eta}{H}| &\le \frac{1}{|V|}\int_V \norm{\pi_0(x)\xi - \xi}_H\norm{\eta}_Hdx < \norm{\xi}_H\norm{\eta}_H
\end{align*} \end{align*}
so $\norm{\pi(f)\xi - \xi}_H < \norm{\xi}_H$, and $\pi(f)\xi \ne 0$. so $\norm{\pi(f)\xi - \xi}_H < \norm{\xi}_H$, and $\pi(f)\xi \ne 0$.
(3): Using \autoref{proposition:group-algebra-approximate-identity}, let $\angles{\phi_\alpha}_{\alpha \in A}$ be an approximate identity in $L^1(G; \complex)$. For each $x \in G$ and $f \in L^1(G; \complex)$, $L_x\phi_\alpha * f \to L_x f$ in $L^1(G; \complex)$ implies that $\angles{\pi(\phi_\alpha)}_{\alpha \in A}$ converges pointwise on (3): Using \autoref{proposition:group-algebra-approximate-identity}, let $\angles{\phi_\alpha}_{\alpha \in A}$ be an approximate identity in $L^1(G; \complex)$. For each $x \in G$ and $f \in L^1(G; \complex)$, $L_x\phi_\alpha * f \to L_x f$ in $L^1(G; \complex)$ implies that $\angles{\pi(L_x\phi_\alpha)}_{\alpha \in A}$ converges pointwise on
\[ \[
K := \text{span}\bracsn{\pi(g)\xi|\xi \in H, g \in L^1(G; \complex)} K := \text{span}\bracsn{\pi(g)\xi|\xi \in H, g \in L^1(G; \complex)}
\] \]
Given that $\pi$ is non-degenerate, $K$ is dense in $H$. As $\bracsn{L_x\phi_\alpha|\alpha \in A}$ is equicontinuous and $H$ is complete, the \hyperref[Arzelà-Ascoli Theorem]{theorem:arzela-ascoli} implies that there exists $\pi_0(x) \in \ol{B_{B(H)}(0, 1)}$ such that $L_x\phi_\alpha \to \pi_0(x)$ in the strong operator topology. In particular, $\pi_0(1) = \text{Id}$. Given that $\pi$ is non-degenerate, $K$ is dense in $H$. As $\bracsn{\pi(L_x\phi_\alpha)|\alpha \in A}$ is equicontinuous and $H$ is complete, the \hyperref[Arzelà-Ascoli Theorem]{theorem:arzela-ascoli} implies that there exists $\pi_0(x) \in \ol{B_{B(H)}(0, 1)}$ such that $\pi(L_x\phi_\alpha) \to \pi_0(x)$ in the strong operator topology. In particular, $\pi_0(1) = \text{Id}$.
For each $f \in L^1(G; \complex)$, $\xi \in H$, and $x, y \in G$, For each $f \in L^1(G; \complex)$, $\xi \in H$, and $x, y \in G$,
\[ \[
\pi_0(xy)\pi(f)\xi = \pi(L_{xy}f)\xi = \pi(L_xL_yf)\xi = \pi_0(x)\pi_0(y)\pi(f)\xi \pi_0(xy)\pi(f)\xi = \pi(L_{xy}f)\xi = \pi(L_xL_yf)\xi = \pi_0(x)\pi_0(y)\pi(f)\xi
\] \]
By density of $K$ in $H$, $\pi_0(xy) = \pi_0(x)\pi_0(y)$, so $\pi$ is a homomorphism. For any $x \in G$, $\text{Id} = \pi_0(1) = \pi_0(x)\pi_0(x^{-1})$, so $\pi_0(x)$ is isometric and invertible, and hence unitary. By density of $K$ in $H$, $\pi_0(xy) = \pi_0(x)\pi_0(y)$, so $\pi_0$ is a homomorphism. For any $x \in G$, $\text{Id} = \pi_0(1) = \pi_0(x)\pi_0(x^{-1})$, so $\pi_0(x)$ is isometric and invertible, and hence unitary.
Finally, for any $f \in L^1(G; \complex)$ and $\xi, \eta \in H$, by the \hyperref[Dominated Convergence Theorem]{theorem:dct}, Finally, for any $f \in L^1(G; \complex)$ and $\xi, \eta \in H$, by the \hyperref[Dominated Convergence Theorem]{theorem:dct},
\begin{align*} \begin{align*}
@@ -91,9 +91,9 @@
Let $G$ be a locally compact group, $(H, \pi_0)$ be a unitary representation of $G$, and $\pi: L^1(G; \complex) \to B(H)$ be the *-representation determined by $\pi_0$, then the von Neumann algebras generated by $\pi_0(G)$ and $\pi(L^1(G; \complex))$ coincide. Let $G$ be a locally compact group, $(H, \pi_0)$ be a unitary representation of $G$, and $\pi: L^1(G; \complex) \to B(H)$ be the *-representation determined by $\pi_0$, then the von Neumann algebras generated by $\pi_0(G)$ and $\pi(L^1(G; \complex))$ coincide.
\end{theorem} \end{theorem}
\begin{proof} \begin{proof}
By (3) of \autoref{definition:representation-l1-group-algebra}, $\pi_0(G)$ lies in the strong-operator closure of $L^1(G; \complex)$. By (3) of \autoref{definition:representation-l1-group-algebra}, $\pi_0(G)$ lies in the strong-operator closure of $\pi(L^1(G; \complex))$.
On the other hand, let $K \subset G$ be compact, $\eps > 0$, and $\seqf{(\xi_j, \eta_j)} \subset H^2$, then there exist non-empty sets $\bracsn{V_k}_1^m \subset 2^G$ such that $K = \bigsqcup_{j = 1}^n V_j$ and $|\dpn{[\pi_0(x) - \pi_0(y)]\xi_j, \eta_j}{H}| \le \eps$ for all $x, y \in V_k$, $1 \le j \le n$, and $1 \le k \le m$. On the other hand, let $K \subset G$ be compact, $\eps > 0$, and $\seqf{(\xi_j, \eta_j)} \subset H^2$, then there exist non-empty sets $\bracsn{V_k}_1^m \subset 2^G$ such that $K = \bigsqcup_{k = 1}^m V_k$ and $|\dpn{[\pi_0(x) - \pi_0(y)]\xi_j, \eta_j}{H}| \le \eps$ for all $x, y \in V_k$, $1 \le j \le n$, and $1 \le k \le m$.
Let $\seqf{x_k} \subset G$ with $x_k \in V_k$ for all $1 \le k \le m$, then Let $\seqf{x_k} \subset G$ with $x_k \in V_k$ for all $1 \le k \le m$, then
\begin{align*} \begin{align*}
+1 -1
View File
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
\begin{lemma} \begin{lemma}
\label{lemma:lcg-intertwining} \label{lemma:lcg-intertwining}
Let $G$ be a locally compact group and $(H, \pi)$ be a unitary representation of $G$, then $\mathcal{C}(\pi, \pi)$ is the commutant of $\pi(G)'$, and hence a von Neumann algebra. Let $G$ be a locally compact group and $(H, \pi)$ be a unitary representation of $G$, then $\mathcal{C}(\pi, \pi) = \pi(G)'$, and hence a von Neumann algebra.
\end{lemma} \end{lemma}
\begin{definition}[Invariant Subspace] \begin{definition}[Invariant Subspace]