Added the holomorphic functional calculus.
All checks were successful
Compile Project / Compile (push) Successful in 35s
All checks were successful
Compile Project / Compile (push) Successful in 35s
This commit is contained in:
10
refs.bib
10
refs.bib
@@ -141,3 +141,13 @@
|
||||
year={2016},
|
||||
publisher={CRC Press}
|
||||
}
|
||||
@book{Takesaki1,
|
||||
title={Theory of Operator Algebras I},
|
||||
author={Takesaki, M.},
|
||||
isbn={9783540422488},
|
||||
lccn={79013655},
|
||||
series={Encyclopaedia of Mathematical Sciences},
|
||||
url={https://books.google.ca/books?id=38QIwQEACAAJ},
|
||||
year={2001},
|
||||
publisher={Springer Berlin Heidelberg}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,10 +3,17 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:existence-curves}
|
||||
Let $K \subset \complex$ be compact and $U \in \cn_\complex(K)$, then there exists closed rectifiable curves $\seqf{\gamma_j}$ such that for any separated locally convex space $E$, $f \in H(U; E)$, and $z_0 \in K$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
f(z_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\sum_{j = 1}^n \int_{\gamma_j} \frac{f(z)}{z - z_0}dz
|
||||
\]
|
||||
Let $K \subset \complex$ be compact and $U \in \cn_\complex(K)$, then there exists closed rectifiable curves $\seqf{\gamma_j}$ such that for any separated locally convex space $E$,
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item For every $f \in H(U; E)$ and $z_0 \in K$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
f(z_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\sum_{j = 1}^n \int_{\gamma_j} \frac{f(z)}{z - z_0}dz
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\item For every $V \in \cn_\complex(U)$, $f \in H(V; E)$, and $z_0 \in V \setminus U$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\frac{1}{2\pi i}\sum_{j = 1}^n \int_{\gamma_j} \frac{f(z)}{z - z_0}dz = 0
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[Proposition VIII.1.1]{ConwayComplex}}}. ]
|
||||
Via \hyperref[fattening]{proposition:distance-compact}, let $V \in \cn_\complex^o(K)$ precompact with $\ol V \subset U$. Identify $\complex = \real^2$, then since $V$ is precompact, there exists $\delta > 0$ and $\seqf{(x_j, y_j)} \subset U$ such that:
|
||||
@@ -60,6 +67,7 @@
|
||||
Finally, let $1 \le j \le m$. Since $\mu_j$ does not form a redundant pair, $\mu_j(1)$ intersects at most two distinct squares by (3). In which case, there must exist $1 \le k \le m$ such that $\mu_k(0) = \mu_j(1)$. Therefore $\seqf[m]{\mu_j}$ forms a collection of closed rectifiable curves.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{lemma}
|
||||
\label{lemma:rational-curve-approximation}
|
||||
Let $\gamma \in C([a, b]; \complex)$ be a rectifiable curve, $K \subset \complex$ such that $K \cap \gamma([a, b]) = \emptyset$, $f \in C(\gamma([a, b]); \complex)$, and $\eps > 0$, then there exists $R \in \complex(z)$ such that:
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -15,4 +15,14 @@
|
||||
Let $A$ be a Banach algebra, then $A$ is \textbf{unital} if there exists $1 \in A$ such that for any $x \in A$, $x1 = 1x = x$. In which case, $1$ is the unique \textbf{multiplicative identity} of $A$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Homomorphism]
|
||||
\label{definition:banach-algebra-homomorphism}
|
||||
Let $A, B$ be Banach algebras and $\phi: A \to B$, then $\phi$ is a \textbf{homomorphism} if:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item $\phi \in L(A; B)$.
|
||||
\item For each $x, y \in A$, $\phi(xy) = \phi(x)\phi(y)$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
96
src/op/banach/fc.tex
Normal file
96
src/op/banach/fc.tex
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,96 @@
|
||||
\section{The Holomorphic Functional Calculus}
|
||||
\label{section:holomorphic-functional-calculus}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Holomorphic Functional Calculus]
|
||||
\label{definition:holomorphic-functional-calculus}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital Banach algebra and $x \in A$, then there exists a unique continuous homomorphism
|
||||
\[
|
||||
H(\sigma_A(x); \complex) \to A \quad f \mapsto f(x)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
such that:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item $1(x) = 1$.
|
||||
\item $\text{Id}(x) = x$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
Moreover,
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}[start=2]
|
||||
\item For each $U \in \cn_\complex(\sigma_A(x))$ and closed rectifiable curves $\seqf{\gamma_j}$ on $U \setminus \sigma_A(x)$ such that $f(z_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\sum_{j = 1}^n \int_{\gamma_j} f(z)/(z - z_0)dz$ for all $f \in H(U; \complex)$ and $z_0 \in \sigma_A(x)$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
f(x) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\sum_{j = 1}^n \int_{\gamma_j} \frac{f(\lambda)}{\lambda - x}d\lambda
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
for all $f \in H(U; \complex)$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
The mapping $f \mapsto f(x)$ is the \textbf{holomorphic functional calculus} of $x$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[Proposition I.2.7]{Takesaki1}}}. ]
|
||||
(Definition): Let $U, V \in \cn_\complex(\sigma_A(x))$ such that $\ol V \subset U$, then by \autoref{proposition:existence-curves}, there exists closed rectifiable curves $\seqf{\gamma_j}$ on $V \setminus \sigma_A(x)$ such that
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
|
||||
\item For all $f \in H(V; \complex)$ and $z_0 \in \sigma_A(x)$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
f(z_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\sum_{j = 1}^n \int_{\gamma_j} \frac{f(z)}{z - z_0}dz
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
\item For all $f \in H(U; \complex)$ and $z_0 \in U \setminus V$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\frac{1}{2\pi i}\sum_{j = 1}^n \int_{\gamma_j} \frac{f(z)}{z - z_0}dz = 0
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
For each $f \in H(U; \complex)$, define
|
||||
\[
|
||||
f(x) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\sum_{j = 1}^n \int_{\gamma_j} \frac{f(\lambda)}{\lambda - x}d\lambda
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
then by \hyperref[Cauchy's Theorem]{theorem:cauchy-homotopy}, the above definition is independent of the choice of curves satisfying (a).
|
||||
|
||||
(Linearity): By \autoref{proposition:rs-bound}, the mapping $f \mapsto f(z)$ is a continuous linear map from $H(\sigma_A(x); \complex)$ to $A$.
|
||||
|
||||
(Homomorphism): Let $T$ be the union of the image of $\seq{\gamma_j}$. By \autoref{proposition:existence-curves}, there exists closed rectifiable curves $\seqf[m]{\mu_j}$ on $U \setminus \ol V$ such that $g(z_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\sum_{j = 1}^m \int_{\mu_j} g(z)/(z - z_0)dz$ for all $f \in H(U; \complex)$ and $z_0 \in \ol V$. Now,
|
||||
\begin{align*}
|
||||
f(x)g(x) &= \frac{1}{(2\pi i)^2}\sum_{j = 1}^n \sum_{k = 1}^m \braks{\int_{\gamma_j} \frac{f(z)}{z - x}dz} \cdot \braks{\int_{\mu_k}\frac{g(w)}{w - x}dw} \\
|
||||
&= \frac{1}{(2\pi i)^2}\sum_{j = 1}^n \sum_{k = 1}^m \int_{\gamma_j}\int_{\mu_k} \frac{f(z)g(w)}{(z - x)(w - x)}dwdz
|
||||
\end{align*}
|
||||
|
||||
For each $z, w \in U \setminus \sigma_A(x)$ with $z \ne w$, by the \hyperref[resolvent equation]{lemma:resolvent-equation},
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\frac{f(z)g(w)}{(z - x)(w - x)} = \frac{f(z)g(w)}{w - z}\braks{\frac{1}{z - x} - \frac{1}{w - x}}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
By assumptions on $\seqf[m]{\mu_j}$, for each $1 \le j \le n$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\frac{1}{2\pi i }\int_{\gamma_j} \sum_{k = 1}^m \int_{\mu_k} \frac{f(z)g(w)}{(w - z)(z - x)}dwdz = \int_{\gamma_j} \frac{f(z)g(z)}{z - x}dz
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
By assumption (b) and \hyperref[Fubini's Theorem]{theorem:rs-fubini}, for each $1 \le k \le m$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\sum_{j = 1}^n\int_{\gamma_j}\int_{\mu_k} \frac{f(z)g(w)}{(w - z)(z - x)}dwdz = 0
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
Therefore
|
||||
\[
|
||||
f(x)g(x) = \frac{1}{2\pi i }\sum_{j = 1}^n \int_{\gamma_j} \frac{f(z)g(z)}{z - x}dz = (fg)(x)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
and the mapping $f \mapsto f(x)$ is a homomorphism.
|
||||
|
||||
(1): Since the constant $1$ function is the identity in $H(\sigma_A(x); \complex)$, $1(x) = 1$ by the homomorphism property.
|
||||
|
||||
(2): Let $R > 0$ such that $\sigma_A(x) \subset B_\complex(0, R)$, then by \autoref{proposition:rs-complete} and \hyperref[Cauchy's Integral Formula]{theorem:cauchy-formula},
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\text{Id}(x) = \frac{1}{2\pi i }\int_{\omega_{0, R}} \frac{1}{z - x}dz = \frac{1}{2\pi i }\sum_{n = 0}^\infty\int_{\omega_{0, R}} z^{-n-1}x^n dz = 1
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
and
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\text{Id}(x) = \frac{1}{2\pi i }\int_{\omega_{0, R}} \frac{z}{z - x}dz = \frac{1}{2\pi i }\sum_{n = 0}^\infty\int_{\omega_{0, R}} z^{-n}x^n dz = x
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
(Uniqueness): By (2), the homomorphism extends uniquely to $\complex(z) \cap H(\sigma_A(x); \complex)$. By \hyperref[Runge's Theorem]{corollary:runge-rational-approximation}, it extends uniquely to $H(\sigma_A(x); \complex)$ by continuity.
|
||||
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -4,4 +4,5 @@
|
||||
\input{./definitions.tex}
|
||||
\input{./invertible.tex}
|
||||
\input{./igroup.tex}
|
||||
\input{./spectrum.tex}
|
||||
\input{./spectrum.tex}
|
||||
\input{./fc.tex}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -34,6 +34,22 @@
|
||||
By \autoref{proposition:banach-algebra-inverse}, the mapping $y \mapsto y^{-1}$ is smooth on $G(A)$. Hence $R_x: \complex \setminus \sigma_A(x) \to A$ is holomorphic.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{lemma}[Resolvent Equation]
|
||||
\label{lemma:resolvent-equation}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital Banach algebra, $x \in A$, and $\lambda, \mu \in \complex \setminus \sigma_A(x)$, then
|
||||
\[
|
||||
R_x(\lambda) - R_x(\mu) = (\mu - \lambda)R_x(\lambda) R_x(\mu)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{lemma}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
\begin{align*}
|
||||
[R_x(\lambda) - R_x(\mu)](\mu - x) &= (\lambda - x)^{-1}(\mu - x) - 1 \\
|
||||
(\lambda - x)[R_x(\lambda) - R_x(\mu)](\mu - x)&= (\mu - x) - (\lambda - x) = \mu - \lambda \\
|
||||
R_x(\lambda) - R_x(\mu) &= (\mu - \lambda)R_x(\lambda)R_x(\mu)
|
||||
\end{align*}
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:spectrum-non-empty}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user