Added some example facts.
This commit is contained in:
5
.vscode/project.code-snippets
vendored
5
.vscode/project.code-snippets
vendored
@@ -171,5 +171,10 @@
|
||||
"scope": "latex",
|
||||
"prefix": "rank",
|
||||
"body": ["\\text{rk}"]
|
||||
},
|
||||
"Cite Proof": {
|
||||
"scope": "latex",
|
||||
"prefix": "cproof",
|
||||
"body": ["{Proof, {{\\cite[$1]{$2}}}. }$0"]
|
||||
}
|
||||
}
|
||||
|
||||
38
src/op/example/bc.tex
Normal file
38
src/op/example/bc.tex
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,38 @@
|
||||
\section{$BC(X)$}
|
||||
\label{section:bounded-continuous-functions-algebra}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Algebra of Bounded Continuous Functions]
|
||||
\label{definition:bc-algebra}
|
||||
Let $X$ be a topological space, then $BC(X; \complex)$ is the \textbf{space of bounded continuous functions} on $X$.
|
||||
|
||||
Equipped with pointwise operations and the uniform norm, $BC(X; \complex)$ forms a commutative Banach algebra.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}
|
||||
\label{theorem:multiplicative-functional-bc}
|
||||
Let $X$ be a completely regular space and $\beta X$ be its \hyperref[Stone-Čech compactification]{definition:stone-cech}. For each $f \in BC(X; \complex)$, let $\beta f \in BC(\beta X; \complex)$ be its unique extension to $\beta X$, then the mapping
|
||||
\[
|
||||
E: \beta X \to \Omega(BC(X; \complex)) \quad E(x)(f) = (\beta f)(x)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
is a homeomorphism.
|
||||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Let $\phi \in BC(X; \complex)^* \setminus \ol{E(X)}$, then there exists $\seqf{f_k} \subset BC(X; \complex)$ and $\eps > 0$ such that for every $x \in X$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
f(x) = \sum_{k = 1}^n |f_k(x) - \dpn{f_k, \phi}{BC(X; \complex)}|^2 \ge \eps^2
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
In which case, if $\phi \in \Omega(BC(X; \complex))$, then
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\dpn{f, \phi}{BC(X; \complex)} = \sum_{k = 1}^n \phi(f_k - \phi(f_k))\phi(\ol{f_k - \phi(f_k)}) = 0
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
Since $f(x) > 0$ for all $x \in X$, $f \in G(BC(X; \complex))$. As $\phi \in \Omega(BC(X; \complex))$, the above contradicts (3) of \autoref{proposition:multiplicative-unit}. Thus $\Omega(BC(X; \complex)) \setminus \ol{E(X)}$ is empty, and $E(X)$ is dense in $\Omega(BC(X; \complex))$.
|
||||
|
||||
By (U) of the \hyperref[Stone-Čech compactification]{definition:stone-cech}, $E|_X$ extends uniquely to a surjective continuous map. Since $BC(\beta X; \complex)$ and $BC(X; \complex)$ are in bijection via the restriction map, $E$ is injective. Therefore $E$ is bijective, and $E$ is a homeomorphism by \autoref{proposition:compact-hausdorff-homeomorphism}.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -17,7 +17,7 @@
|
||||
The space $\ell^1(\integer)$ is the \textbf{convolution algebra} on $\integer$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
For each $f, g \in \ell^1(\integer)$,
|
||||
For each $f, g \in \ell^1(\integer)$, by \hyperref[Fubini's Theorem]{theorem:fubini-tonelli},
|
||||
\begin{align*}
|
||||
\normn{f * g}_{\ell^1(\integer)} &= \sum_{n \in \integer} \abs{\sum_{k \in \integer}f(k)g(n - k)} \\
|
||||
&\le \sum_{n, k \in \integer}|f(k)| \cdot |g(n-k)| \le \sum_{k \in \integer}|f(k)| \cdot \sum_{n \in \integer}|g(n - k)| \\
|
||||
@@ -45,4 +45,31 @@
|
||||
so $\normn{f^2}_{\ell^1(\integer)} = 7 < \normn{f}_{\ell^1(\integer)}^2$. By \autoref{proposition:gelfand-isometric}, the Gelfand transform is not isometric.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}
|
||||
\label{theorem:convolution-integer-gelfand}
|
||||
Let $\ell^1(\integer)$ be the convolution algebra on $\integer$, then the mapping
|
||||
\[
|
||||
F: \mathbf{S}^1 = \partial B_\complex(0, 1) \to \Omega(\ell^1(\integer)) \quad
|
||||
(F(z))(f) = \sum_{n \in \integer}f(n)z^n
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
is a homeomorphism.
|
||||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
\begin{proof}{Proof, {{\cite[Theorem 6.3]{Zhu}}}. }
|
||||
Let $z \in \mathbf{S}^1$ and $f, g \in \ell^1(\integer)$, then by \hyperref[Fubini's Theorem]{theorem:fubini-tonelli},
|
||||
\begin{align*}
|
||||
F(z)(f * g) &= \sum_{n \in \integer}z^n \sum_{k \in \integer}f(k)g(n-k) \\
|
||||
&= \sum_{k \in \natp}f(k)z^k \sum_{n \in \integer}z^{n-k}g(n-k) \\
|
||||
&= F(z)(f) \cdot F(z)(g)
|
||||
\end{align*}
|
||||
|
||||
so $F(z)$ is a multiplicative functional for all $z \in \mathbf{S}^1$.
|
||||
|
||||
For each $n \in \integer$, let $\delta_n = \one_{\bracs{k = n}}$, then for any $m, n \in \integer$, $\delta_m * \delta_n = \delta_{m + n}$. Let $\phi \in \Omega(\ell^1(\integer))$ and $z = \phi(\delta_1)$, then $\phi(\delta_n) = z^n$ for all $n \in \integer$. Since the span of $\bracsn{\delta_n|n \in \integer}$ is dense in $\ell^1(\integer)$, $\phi = F(z)$ by the \hyperref[Dominated Convergence Theorem]{theorem:dct}.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, by the \hyperref[Dominated Convergence Theorem]{theorem:dct}, $F: \textbf{S}^1 \to \Omega(\ell^1(\integer))$ is continuous. Since $\textbf{S}^1$ is compact, $\Omega(\ell^1(\integer))$ is Hausdorff, and $F$ is a bijection, $F$ is a homeomorphism by \autoref{proposition:compact-hausdorff-homeomorphism}.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -13,10 +13,17 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:disk-algebra-multiplicative-functional}
|
||||
Let $\phi \in A(D)^*$ be a multiplicative linear functional, then there exists $z_0 \in \ol D$ such that for every $f \in A(D)$, $\phi(f) = f(z_0)$.
|
||||
Let $D = B_\complex(0, 1)$ and $A(D)$ be the disk algebra, then the mapping
|
||||
\[
|
||||
E: \ol D \to \Omega(D) \quad E(z_0)(f) = f(z_0)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
is a homeomorphism.
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
By \autoref{proposition:multiplicative-unit}, $\norm{\phi}_{A(D)^*} = 1$. Let $p$ be the identity polynomial, and $z_0 = \phi(p)$, then for every $q \in \complex[x]$, $\phi(q) = q(x_0)$. By density of polynomials in $A(D)$, $\phi(f) = f(z_0)$ for all $f \in A(D)$.
|
||||
Let $\phi \in \Omega(D)$. By \autoref{proposition:multiplicative-unit}, $\norm{\phi}_{A(D)^*} = 1$. Let $p$ be the identity polynomial, and $z_0 = \phi(p)$, then for every $q \in \complex[x]$, $\phi(q) = q(x_0)$. By density of polynomials in $A(D)$, $\phi(f) = f(z_0)$ for all $f \in A(D)$. Therefore $\ol D$ is in bijection with $\Omega(D)$.
|
||||
|
||||
Since $A(D) \subset C(\ol D)$, $E$ is continuous. As $\ol D$ is compact and $\Omega(D)$ is Hausdorff, $E$ is a homeomorphism by \autoref{proposition:compact-hausdorff-homeomorphism}.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -3,7 +3,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Hardy Space]
|
||||
\label{definition:hardy-space}
|
||||
Let $D = B_\complex(0, 1)$, then the \textbf{Hardy space} $H^\infty(D)$ is the space of all bounded holomorphic functions on $D$, equipped with the uniform norm.
|
||||
Let $D = B_\complex(0, 1)$, then the \textbf{Hardy space} $H^\infty(D)$ is the algebra of all bounded holomorphic functions on $D$, equipped with the uniform norm.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -70,6 +70,15 @@
|
||||
Let $x \in E^c$. For each $y \in E$, there exists $U_y \in \cn(y)$ and $V_y \in \cn(x)$ such that $U_y \cap V_y = \emptyset$. By compactness, there exists $E_0 \subset E$ finite such that $\bigcup_{y \in E_0}U_y \supset E$. In which case, $E \cap \bigcap_{y \in E_0}V_y = \emptyset$ and $\bigcap_{y \in E_0}V_y \in \cn(x)$. Thus $E^c$ is open.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:compact-hausdorff-homeomorphism}
|
||||
Let $X$ be a compact topological space, $Y$ be a Hausdorff space, and $f \in C(X; Y)$ be a bijection, then $f$ is a homeomorphism.
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
For each $K \subset X$ closed, $K$ and $f(K)$ are compact by \autoref{proposition:compact-extensions}. By \autoref{proposition:compact-closed}, $f(K)$ is closed. Thus $f^{-1}$ maps closed sets to closed sets, and hence open sets to open sets.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:compact-hausdorff-normal}
|
||||
Let $X$ be a Hausdorff space, $A, B \subset X$ be compact with $A \cap B = \emptyset$, then there exists $U \in \cn(A)$ and $V \in \cn(B)$ such that $U \cap V = \emptyset$.
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
Moreover, if $(\beta X, e)$ is \textit{any} pair that satisfies (1) and (U1), then
|
||||
Moreover, if $(\beta X, e)$ is \textit{any} pair that satisfies (U1), then
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item[(U2)] For any pair $(Y, \varphi)$ satisfying (1), there exists a unique $\beta \varphi \in C(\beta X; Y)$ such that the following diagram commutes:
|
||||
\[
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user