Every product of nuclear spaces is nuclear.
All checks were successful
Compile Project / Compile (push) Successful in 48s
All checks were successful
Compile Project / Compile (push) Successful in 48s
This commit is contained in:
@@ -86,6 +86,15 @@
|
||||
Let $E$ be a complete nuclear space over $K \in \RC$, then $E$ is a projective limit of Hilbert spaces over $K$. For any Fréchet space $F$, $F$ is nuclear if and only if it is the projective limit of a sequence $\seq{H_n}$ of Hilbert spaces such that the mapping $H_m \to H_n$ is nuclear for all $1 \le m < n < \infty$.
|
||||
\end{corollary}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{summary}
|
||||
\label{summary:nuclear-extension}
|
||||
Every subspace and separated qoutient space of a nuclear space is nuclear. The product of nuclear spaces is nuclear. The locally convex direct sum of countably many nuclear spaces is nuclear.
|
||||
\end{summary}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
See \autoref{proposition:nuclear-quotient}, \autoref{proposition:nuclear-subspace}, \autoref{proposition:nuclear-direct-sum}, and \autoref{proposition:nuclear-product}.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:nuclear-subspace}
|
||||
Let $E$ be a nuclear space over $K \in \RC$ and $F \subset E$ be a subspace, then $F$ is also nuclear.
|
||||
@@ -139,6 +148,8 @@
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:nuclear-quotient}
|
||||
Let $E$ be a nuclear space over $K \in \RC$, and $F$ be a closed subspace of $E$, then $E/F$ is also nuclear.
|
||||
@@ -211,3 +222,20 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, for each $n \in \natp$, let $U_n = \bigcap_{k \in \natp}\phi_{n, k}^{-1}(B_K(0, 1))$, then $U_n \in \cn_{E_n}(0)$ by equicontinuity of $\bracsn{\phi_{n, k}}_{k = 1}^\infty \subset E_n^*$. Let $U = \aconv(\bigcup_{n \in \natp}U_n)$, then $U \in \cn_{\bigoplus_{n = 1}^\infty E_n}(0)$ and $U \subset \bigcap_{n \in \natp}\bigcap_{k \in\natp}(\phi_{n, k} \circ \pi_n)^{-1}(B_K(0, 1))$. Hence $\bracsn{\phi_{n, k} \circ \pi_n|n, k \in \natp}$ is equicontinuous, and $T$ is a nuclear operator.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:nuclear-product}
|
||||
Let $\seqi{E}$ be nuclear spaces over $K \in \RC$, then $\prod_{i \in I}E_i$ is nuclear.
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[Theorem III.7.4]{SchaeferWolff}}}. ]
|
||||
Let $F$ be a Banach space and $T \in L(\prod_{i \in I}E_i; F)$, then there exists $J \subset I$ finite and $\wh T \in L(\prod_{j \in J}E_j; F)$ such that the following diagram commutes:
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\xymatrix{
|
||||
\prod_{i \in I} E_i \ar@{->}[r]^{T} \ar@{->}[d]_{\pi_J} & F \\
|
||||
\prod_{j \in J}E_j \ar@{->}[ru]_{\widehat T} &
|
||||
}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
By \autoref{proposition:finite-lc-product}, $\prod_{j \in J}E_j = \bigoplus_{j \in J}E_j$. By \autoref{proposition:nuclear-direct-sum}, $\bigoplus_{j \in J}E_j$ is a nuclear space, so $\widehat T: \bigoplus_{j \in J}E_j \to F$ is a nuclear operator. As the composition of a continuous operator and a nuclear operator, $T$ is nuclear by \autoref{proposition:nuclear-gymnastics}. Therefore $\prod_{i \in I}E_i$ is a nuclear space.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user