135 lines
6.2 KiB
TeX
135 lines
6.2 KiB
TeX
\section{Norms}
|
|
\label{section:normed-banach}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{definition}[Norm]
|
|
\label{definition:norm}
|
|
Let $E$ be a vector space over $K \in \RC$ and $\norm{\cdot}_E: E \to [0, \infty)$, then $\norm{\cdot}_E$ is a \textbf{norm} if:
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item[(N)] For any $x \in E$, $\norm{x}_E = 0$ if and only if $x = 0$.
|
|
\item[(SN2)] For any $x \in E$ and $\lambda \in K$, $\norm{\lambda x}_E = \abs{\lambda} \norm{x}_E$.
|
|
\item[(SN3)] For any $x, y \in E$, $\norm{x + y}_E \le \norm{x}_E + \norm{y}_E$.
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
In which case, the pair $(E, \norm{\cdot}_E)$ is a \textbf{normed vector space} over $K$.
|
|
\end{definition}
|
|
|
|
\begin{definition}[Banach Space]
|
|
\label{definition:banach-space}
|
|
Let $E$ be a normed vector space over $K \in \RC$, then $E$ is a \textbf{Banach space} if it is complete.
|
|
\end{definition}
|
|
|
|
\begin{lemma}
|
|
\label{lemma:banach-criterion}
|
|
Let $E$ be a normed vector space, then the following are equivalent:
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item $E$ is a Banach space.
|
|
\item For each $\seq{x_n} \subset E$ with $\sum_{n \in \natp}\norm{x_n}_E < \infty$, there exists $x \in E$ such that $x = \sum_{n = 1}^\infty x_n$.
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
\end{lemma}
|
|
\begin{proof}
|
|
(2) $\Rightarrow$ (1): Let $\seq{x_n} \subset E$ be a Cauchy sequence, then there exists a subsequence $\seq{n_k}$ such that $\norm{x_{n_{k+1}} - x_{n_{k}}}_E < 2^{-k}$ for all $k \in \natp$. For each $k \in \natp$, let $y_k = x_{n_{k+1}} - x_{n_{k}}$, then there exists $y \in E$ such that $y = \sum_{k = 1}^\infty y_k$. Let $\eps > 0$, then there exists $K \in \natp$ such that:
|
|
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
|
|
\item $\norm{y - \sum_{k = 1}^{K-1} y_k}_E < \eps$.
|
|
\item For each $n \ge n_K$, $\norm{x_n - x_{n_K}}_E < \eps$.
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
In which case, for every $n \ge n_K$,
|
|
\begin{align*}
|
|
\norm{x_n - (y + x_{n_1})}_E &< \norm{x_{n_K} - (y + x_{n_1})}_E + \eps \\
|
|
&= \norm{y - \sum_{k = 1}^{K-1} (x_{n_{k+1}} - x_{n_{k}})}_E + \eps \\
|
|
&= \norm{y - \sum_{k = 1}^{K-1} y_k}_E + \epsilon < 2\eps
|
|
\end{align*}
|
|
|
|
Therefore $x_n \to y + x_{n_1}$ as $n \to \infty$.
|
|
|
|
|
|
\end{proof}
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{proposition}
|
|
\label{proposition:norm-criterion}
|
|
Let $E$ be a separated TVS over $K \in \RC$, then the following are equivalent:
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item There exists $U \in \cn^o(0)$ bounded and convex.
|
|
\item There exists a norm $\norm{\cdot}_E: E \to [0, \infty)$ that induces the topology on $E$.
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
\end{proposition}
|
|
\begin{proof}
|
|
(1) $\Rightarrow$ (2): Using \autoref{proposition:tvs-good-neighbourhood-base}, assume without loss of generality that $U$ is also circled. Let $V \in \cn^o(0)$, then there exists $\lambda \in K$ such that $\lambda V \supset U$ and $\abs{\lambda}^{-1}U \subset V$.
|
|
|
|
Let $\norm{\cdot}_E: E \to [0, \infty)$ be the \hyperref[gauge]{definition:gauge} of $U$. For each $r > 0$, let $B_E(0, r) = \bracs{x \in E|\norm{x}_E < r}$, then
|
|
\[
|
|
\bracs{\lambda U|\lambda > 0} = \bracs{B_E(0, r)|r > 0}
|
|
\]
|
|
|
|
is a fundamental system of neighbourhoods at $0$ for $E$. Therefore $\norm{\cdot}_E$ induces the topology on $E$.
|
|
\end{proof}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{theorem}[Successive Approximations]
|
|
\label{theorem:successive-approximation}
|
|
Let $E, F$ be normed vector spaces, $T \in L(E; F)$, $C \ge 0$, and $\gamma \in (0, 1)$. If for all $y \in F$, there exists $x \in E$ such that:
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item[(a)] $\norm{x}_E \le C\norm{y}_F$.
|
|
\item[(b)] $\norm{y - Tx}_F \le \gamma \norm{y}_F$.
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
then for any $y \in F$, there exists $\seq{x_n} \subset E$ such that:
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item $\sum_{n \in \natp}\norm{x_n}_E \le C\norm{y}_F/(1 - \gamma)$.
|
|
\item $\sum_{n = 1}^\infty Tx_n = y$.
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
In particular, if $E$ is a Banach space, then for every $y \in F$, there exists $x \in E$ such that $\norm{x}_E \le C\norm{y}_F/(1 - \gamma)$ and $Tx = y$.
|
|
\end{theorem}
|
|
\begin{proof}[Proof, learned from Anson Li (https://ansonli0.com/). ]
|
|
Let $y_1 = y \in F$. Let $n \in \natp$ and suppose inductively that $\bracs{x_k| 0 \le k < n}$ and $\bracs{y_k| 0 \le k \le n}$ has been constructed. By (a) and (b), there exists $x_n \in E$ such that $\norm{x_k}_E \le C\norm{y_k}_F$ and $\norm{y_n - Tx_n}_F \le \gamma \norm{y_{n}}_F$. Let $y_{n+1} = y_n - Tx_n$, then $\norm{y_{n+1}}_F \le \gamma \norm{y_n}_F$.
|
|
|
|
For each $n \in \nat$,
|
|
\[
|
|
\norm{y_n}_F \le \gamma^{n - 1}\norm{y_1}_F = \gamma^{n - 1}\norm{y}_F
|
|
\]
|
|
|
|
Since $\norm{x_n}_E \le C\norm{y_n}_F$,
|
|
\[
|
|
\sum_{k \in \natp}\norm{x_k}_E \le C\norm{y}_F\sum_{k \in \nat_0}\gamma^k = \frac{C\norm{y}_F}{1 - \gamma}
|
|
\]
|
|
|
|
In addition,
|
|
\[
|
|
\norm{y - \sum_{k = 1}^n Tx_k}_F = \norm{y_{n+1}}_F \le \gamma^n \norm{y}_F
|
|
\]
|
|
|
|
so $\sum_{n = 1}^\infty Tx_n = y$.
|
|
\end{proof}
|
|
|
|
\begin{theorem}[Uniform Boundedness Principle]
|
|
\label{theorem:uniform-boundedness}
|
|
Let $E, F$ be normed vector spaces and $\mathcal{T} \subset L(E; F)$. If
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item[(B1)] $E$ is a Banach space.
|
|
\item[(B2)] For every $x \in E$, $\sup_{T \in \mathcal{T}}\norm{Tx}_F < \infty$.
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
then $\sup_{T \in \mathcal{T}}\norm{T}_{L(E; F)} < \infty$.
|
|
\end{theorem}
|
|
\begin{proof}
|
|
By the \hyperref[Banach-Steinhaus Theorem]{theorem:banach-steinhaus}, $\mathcal{T}$ is equicontinuous. Therefore there exists $r > 0$ such that $\bigcup_{T \in \mathcal{T}}T[B_E(0, r)] \subset B_F(0, 1)$. In which case, $\sup_{T \in \mathcal{T}}\norm{T}_{L(E; F)} \le r^{-1}$.
|
|
\end{proof}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{proposition}
|
|
\label{proposition:dual-norm}
|
|
Let $E$ be a normed vector space, then for any $x \in E$,
|
|
\[
|
|
\norm{x}_E = \sup_{\substack{\phi \in E^* \\ \norm{\phi}_{E^*} = 1}}\dpn{x, \phi}{E}
|
|
\]
|
|
\end{proposition}
|
|
\begin{proof}
|
|
For any $\phi \in E^*$ with $\norm{\phi}_{E^*} = 1$, $\dpn{x, \phi}{E} \le \norm{x}_E \cdot \norm{\phi}_{E^*} = \norm{x}_E$. On the other hand, by the \hyperref[Hahn-Banach Theorem]{proposition:hahn-banach-utility}, there exists $x \in E^*$ such that $\dpn{x, \phi}{E} = \norm{x}_E$ and $\norm{\phi}_{E^*} \le 1$.
|
|
\end{proof}
|
|
|
|
|