120 lines
6.5 KiB
TeX
120 lines
6.5 KiB
TeX
\section{Convergence in Measure}
|
|
\label{section:convergence-in-measure}
|
|
|
|
\begin{definition}[Convergence in Measure]
|
|
\label{definition:convergence-in-measure}
|
|
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space, $(Y, d)$ be a metric space, and $\fF$ be a filter of $(\cm, \cb_Y)$-measurable functions, and $f$ be a $(\cm, \cb_Y)$-measurable function, then $\fF \to f$ \textbf{in measure} if for each $\eps > 0$,
|
|
\[
|
|
\lim_{g, \fF}\mu(\bracs{d(f, g) > \eps}) = 0
|
|
\]
|
|
|
|
and $\fF \to f$ \textbf{locally in measure} if $\fF \to f$ in measure on every set of finite measure.
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, if $\net{f}$ is a net of $(\cm, \cb_Y)$-measurable functions, then $f_\alpha \to f$ \textbf{in measure} if for each $\eps > 0$,
|
|
\[
|
|
\lim_{\alpha \in A}\mu(\bracs{d(f, f_\alpha) > \eps}) = 0
|
|
\]
|
|
|
|
and $f_\alpha \to f$ \textbf{locally in measure} if $f_\alpha \to f$ in measure on every set of finite measure.
|
|
\end{definition}
|
|
|
|
\begin{definition}[Cauchy in Measure]
|
|
\label{definition:cauchy-in-measure}
|
|
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space, $(Y, d)$ be a metric space, and $\fF$ be a filter of $(\cm, \cb_Y)$-measurable functions, then $\fF$ is \textbf{Cauchy in measure} if for every $\eps, \delta > 0$, there exists $A \in \fF$ such that $\mu(\bracs{d(f, g) > \delta}) < \eps$ for all $f, g \in A$.
|
|
|
|
Alternatively, if $\net{f}$ is a net of $(\cm, \cb_Y)$-measurable functions, then $\net{f}$ is \textbf{Cauchy in measure} if for every $\eps, \delta > 0$, there exists $\alpha_0 \in A$ such that for each $\alpha, \beta \in A$ with $\alpha, \beta \ge \alpha_0$, $\mu(\bracs{d(f_\alpha, f_\beta) > \delta}) < \eps$.
|
|
\end{definition}
|
|
|
|
\begin{lemma}
|
|
\label{lemma:ae-in-measure}
|
|
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a finite measure space, $(Y, d)$ be a metric space, and $\seq{f_n}$ and $f$ be Borel measurable functions from $X$ to $Y$ such that $f_n \to f$ almost everywhere, then $f_n \to f$ in measure.
|
|
\end{lemma}
|
|
\begin{proof}
|
|
Let $\eps > 0$, then for almost every $x \in X$, there exists $N \in \natp$ such that $d(f_n(x), f(x)) < \eps$ for all $n \ge N$, so
|
|
\[
|
|
\mu\paren{\bigcup_{N \in \natp}\bigcap_{n \ge N}\bracs{d(f_n, f) < \eps}} = \mu(X)
|
|
\]
|
|
|
|
By continuity from above (\autoref{proposition:measure-properties}),
|
|
\[
|
|
\limv{N}\mu{\bracs{d(f_N, f) \ge \eps}} \le \limv{N}\mu\paren{\bigcup_{n \ge N}\bracs{d(f_n, f) \ge \eps}} = 0
|
|
\]
|
|
\end{proof}
|
|
|
|
|
|
\begin{proposition}[{{\cite[Theorem 2.30]{Folland}}}]
|
|
\label{proposition:cauchy-in-measure-limit}
|
|
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space, $(Y, d)$ be a complete metric space, and $\seq{f_n} \subset Y^X$ be a sequence Borel measurable functions from $X \to Y$ that is Cauchy in measure, then:
|
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
\item There exists a Borel measurable function $f: X \to Y$ such that $f_n \to f$ in measure.
|
|
\item There exists a subsequence $\seq{n_k}$ such that $f_{n_k} \to f$ almost everywhere.
|
|
\item For any Borel measurable function $g: X \to Y$ such that $f_n \to g$ in measure, $f = g$ almost everywhere.
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
\end{proposition}
|
|
\begin{proof}
|
|
(2): Since $\seq{f_n}$ is Cauchy in measure, there exists a subsequence $\seq{n_k}$ such that for each $k \in \natp$, $\mu(\bracsn{d(f_{n_k}, f_{n_{k+1}}) > 2^{-k}}) \le 2^{-k}$.
|
|
|
|
In this case, for any $K \in \natp$ and $j \ge k \ge K$,
|
|
\[
|
|
\bracsn{d(f_{n_j}, f_{n_k}) > 2^{-K+1}} \subset \bigcup_{\ell = k}^{j - 1}\bracsn{d(f_{n_\ell}, f_{n_{\ell + 1}}) > 2^{-\ell}}
|
|
\subset \bigcup_{\ell = K}^{\infty}\bracsn{d(f_{n_\ell}, f_{n_{\ell + 1}}) > 2^{-\ell}}
|
|
\]
|
|
|
|
By monotonicity and subadditivity (\autoref{proposition:measure-properties}),
|
|
\[
|
|
\mu\paren{\bigcup_{j, k \ge K}\bracsn{d(f_{n_j}, f_{n_k}) > 2^{-K+1}}}
|
|
\le \sum_{\ell \ge K}\mu\bracsn{d(f_{n_\ell}, f_{n_{\ell + 1}}) > 2^{-\ell}}
|
|
\le 2^{-K+1}
|
|
\]
|
|
|
|
so
|
|
\[
|
|
\mu\braks{\paren{\bigcap_{j, k \ge K}\bracsn{d(f_{n_j}, f_{n_k}) \le 2^{-K+1}}}^c} \le 2^{-K+1}
|
|
\]
|
|
|
|
By the \hyperref[First Borel-Cantelli Lemma]{lemma:borel-cantelli-1},
|
|
\[
|
|
\mu\braks{\limsup_{K \to \infty}\paren{\bigcap_{j, k \ge K}\bracsn{d(f_{n_j}, f_{n_k}) \le 2^{-K+1}}}^c} = 0
|
|
\]
|
|
|
|
Thus, for almost every $x \in X$, there exists $K \in \natp$ such that $d(f_{n_j}(x), f_{n_k}(x)) < 2^{-K+1}$ for all $j, k \ge K$. Therefore $\seq{f_n(x)}$ is Cauchy for almost every $x$, and converges to a Borel measurable function $f: X \to Y$.
|
|
|
|
(1): Let $\eps, \delta > 0$, then there exists $N \in \natp$ such that $\mu(\bracs{d(f_m, f_n) > \delta/2}) < \eps/2$ for all $m, n \ge N$. Let $k \in \natp$ such that $n_k \ge N$ and $\mu(\bracs{d(f, f_{n_k}) > \delta/2}) < \eps/2$, then for any $m \ge N$,
|
|
\[
|
|
\mu\bracs{d(f_m, f) > \delta} \le \mu\bracs{d(f_m, f_{n_k}) > \delta/2} + \mu\bracs{d(f, f_{n_k}) > \delta/2} < \eps
|
|
\]
|
|
|
|
(3): By (2), there exists a subsequence $\seq{n_k}$ such that $f_{n_k} \to f$ and $f_{n_k} \to g$ almost everywhere, so $f = g$ almost everywhere.
|
|
\end{proof}
|
|
|
|
\begin{theorem}[Monotone Convergence Theorem (In Measure)]
|
|
\label{theorem:mct-measure}
|
|
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a semifinite measure space, $\net{f} \subset \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$, and $f \in \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$ such that
|
|
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
|
|
\item For each $x \in X$, $f_\alpha(x) \upto f(x)$.
|
|
\item $f_\alpha \to f$ locally in measure.
|
|
\end{enumerate}
|
|
|
|
then
|
|
\[
|
|
\lim_{\alpha \in A}\int f_\alpha d\mu = \int f d\mu
|
|
\]
|
|
\end{theorem}
|
|
\begin{proof}
|
|
By \autoref{definition:lebesgue-non-negative}, $\int f_\alpha d\mu \le \int f d\mu$ for each $\alpha \in A$.
|
|
|
|
Assume without loss of generality that $f \ne 0$. Let $\phi \in \Sigma^+(X, \cm)$ with $\phi|_{\bracs{f > 0}} < f|_{\bracs{f > 0}}$ and $\phi \le f$. Since $\mu$ is semifinite, assume further without loss of generality that $\phi \in L^1(X, \cm; \real)$ as well.
|
|
|
|
Let $\eps > 0$ and $\lambda \in (0, 1)$, then $\delta = \min_{y \in \phi(X) \setminus \bracs{0}}(1 - \lambda)y > 0$. By (b), there exists $\alpha \in A$ such that
|
|
\[
|
|
\mu\bracs{f_\alpha + \delta < f} < \frac{\epsilon}{\norm{\phi}_u}
|
|
\]
|
|
|
|
In which case,
|
|
\begin{align*}
|
|
\int f_\alpha d\mu &\ge \int_{\bracs{f_\alpha + \delta \ge f}} f_\alpha d\mu \ge \int_{\bracs{f_\alpha + \delta \ge f}}\lambda\phi d\mu \\
|
|
&\ge \lambda\int \phi d\mu - \frac{\eps \norm{\phi}_u}{\norm{\phi}_u} = \lambda \int \phi d\mu - \eps
|
|
\end{align*}
|
|
|
|
As the above holds for all $\eps > 0$, $\lambda \in (0, 1)$, $\sup_{\alpha \in A}\int f_\alpha d\mu \ge \int \phi d\mu$. Therefore $\sup_{\alpha \in A}\int f_\alpha d\mu \ge \int f d\mu$ by \autoref{lemma:lebesgue-non-negative-strict}.
|
|
\end{proof} |