Compare commits

...

3 Commits

Author SHA1 Message Date
Bokuan Li
e8474bba3e Fixed equicontinuous formulation.
All checks were successful
Compile Project / Compile (push) Successful in 29s
2026-05-06 23:31:25 -04:00
Bokuan Li
57c32a3c5e Updated spelling of barreled to barrelled for consistency. 2026-05-06 16:50:37 -04:00
Bokuan Li
7e6e37d3e8 Housekeeping. 2026-05-06 16:41:51 -04:00
6 changed files with 27 additions and 29 deletions

View File

@@ -25,14 +25,14 @@
\begin{summary} \begin{summary}
\label{summary:barreled-space} \label{summary:barreled-space}
The following types of locally convex spaces are barreled: The following types of locally convex spaces are barrelled:
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item Every locally convex space with the Baire property. \item Every locally convex space with the Baire property.
\item Every Banach space and every Fréchet space. \item Every Banach space and every Fréchet space.
\item Inductive limits of barreled spaces. \item Inductive limits of barrelled spaces.
\item Spaces of type (LB) and (LF). \item Spaces of type (LB) and (LF).
\item The locally convex direct sum of barreled spaces. \item The locally convex direct sum of barrelled spaces.
\item Products of barreled spaces. \item Products of barrelled spaces.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
\end{summary} \end{summary}
\begin{proof} \begin{proof}
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
\begin{proposition} \begin{proposition}
\label{proposition:baire-barrel} \label{proposition:baire-barrel}
Let $E$ be a locally convex space over $K \in \RC$. If $E$ is a Baire space, then $E$ is barreled. Let $E$ be a locally convex space over $K \in \RC$. If $E$ is a Baire space, then $E$ is barrelled.
\end{proposition} \end{proposition}
\begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[II.7.1]{SchaeferWolff}}}. ] \begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[II.7.1]{SchaeferWolff}}}. ]
Let $D \subset E$ be a Barrel, then $E = \bigcup_{n \in \natp}nD$ is a countable union of closed sets. Since $E$ is Baire, there exists $n \in \natp$, $U \in \cn_E(0)$ circled, and $x \in E$ such that $x + U \in nB$. In which case, Let $D \subset E$ be a Barrel, then $E = \bigcup_{n \in \natp}nD$ is a countable union of closed sets. Since $E$ is Baire, there exists $n \in \natp$, $U \in \cn_E(0)$ circled, and $x \in E$ such that $x + U \in nB$. In which case,
@@ -59,9 +59,9 @@
\begin{proposition} \begin{proposition}
\label{proposition:barrel-limit} \label{proposition:barrel-limit}
Let $\seqi{E}$ be locally convex spaces over $K \in \RC$, $E$ be a vector space over $K$, and $\seqi{T}$ such that $T_i \in \hom(E_i; E)$ for all $i \in I$, then the inductive locally convex topology on $E$ induced by $\seqi{T}$ is barreled. Let $\seqi{E}$ be locally convex spaces over $K \in \RC$, $E$ be a vector space over $K$, and $\seqi{T}$ such that $T_i \in \hom(E_i; E)$ for all $i \in I$, then the inductive locally convex topology on $E$ induced by $\seqi{T}$ is barrelled.
\end{proposition} \end{proposition}
\begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[II.7.2]{SchaeferWolff}}}. ] \begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[II.7.2]{SchaeferWolff}}}. ]
Let $D \subset E$ be a barrel, then for each $i \in I$, $T_i^{-1}(D) \subset E_i$ is also a barrel, and thus a neighbourhood of $0$ in $E_i$. By (5) of \autoref{definition:lc-inductive}, $D$ is a neighbourhood of $0$ in $E$, so $E$ is barreled. Let $D \subset E$ be a barrel, then for each $i \in I$, $T_i^{-1}(D) \subset E_i$ is also a barrel, and thus a neighbourhood of $0$ in $E_i$. By (5) of \autoref{definition:lc-inductive}, $D$ is a neighbourhood of $0$ in $E$, so $E$ is barrelled.
\end{proof} \end{proof}

View File

@@ -73,21 +73,14 @@
\label{theorem:uniform-boundedness} \label{theorem:uniform-boundedness}
Let $E, F$ be normed vector spaces and $\mathcal{T} \subset L(E; F)$. If Let $E, F$ be normed vector spaces and $\mathcal{T} \subset L(E; F)$. If
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item For every $x \in E$, $\sup_{T \in \mathcal{T}}\norm{Tx}_F < \infty$. \item[(B)] $E$ is a Banach space.
\item $E$ is a Banach space. \item[(E2)] For every $x \in E$, $\sup_{T \in \mathcal{T}}\norm{Tx}_F < \infty$.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
then $\sup_{T \in \mathcal{T}}\norm{T}_{L(E; F)} < \infty$. then $\sup_{T \in \mathcal{T}}\norm{T}_{L(E; F)} < \infty$.
\end{theorem} \end{theorem}
\begin{proof} \begin{proof}
For each $n \in \natp$, let $A_n = \bracs{x \in X|\norm{Tx}_F \le n \forall T \in \mathcal{T}}$, then each $A_n$ is closed with $\bigcup_{n \in \natp}A_n = E$. By the \hyperref[Baire Category Theorem]{theorem:baire}, there exists $n \in \natp$ and $U \subset E$ open such that $\sup_{x \in U}\sup_{T \in \mathcal{T}}\norm{Tx}_{F} < \infty$. By the \autoref{theorem:banach-steinhaus} theorem, $\mathcal{T}$ is equicontinuous. Therefore there exists $r > 0$ such that $\bigcup_{T \in \mathcal{T}}T[B_E(0, r)] \subset B_F(0, 1)$. In which case, $\sup_{T \in \mathcal{T}}\norm{T}_{L(E; F)} \le r^{-1}$.
Let $x \in U$ and $r > 0$ such that $\overline{B(x, r)} \subset U$, then for any $y \in E$ with $\norm{y}_E \le r$ and $T \in \mathcal{T}$,
\[
\norm{Ty} = \norm{Ty + Tx - Tx}_E = \normn{T\underbrace{(x + y)}_{\in U}}_E + \norm{Tx}_E \le 2n
\]
so $\sup_{T \in \mathcal{T}}\norm{T}_{L(E; F)} \le 2n/r$.
\end{proof} \end{proof}

View File

@@ -16,6 +16,15 @@
(5) $\Rightarrow$ (1): Let $V \in \cn_F(0)$, then $U = \bigcap_{T \in \alg}T^{-1}(V) \in \cn_E(0)$. Thus for any $x, y \in E$ with $x - y \in U$, $Tx - Ty \in V$ for all $T \in \alg$. (5) $\Rightarrow$ (1): Let $V \in \cn_F(0)$, then $U = \bigcap_{T \in \alg}T^{-1}(V) \in \cn_E(0)$. Thus for any $x, y \in E$ with $x - y \in U$, $Tx - Ty \in V$ for all $T \in \alg$.
\end{proof} \end{proof}
\begin{proposition}
\label{proposition:equicontinuous-bounded}
Let $E, F$ be TVSs over $K \in \RC$ and $\alg \subset L(E; F)$ be equicontinuous, then for any ideal $\sigma \subset \mathfrak{B}(E)$, $\alg$ is a bounded subset of $B_\sigma(E; F)$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Let $S \in \sigma$ and $U \in \cn_F(0)$, then there exists $V \in \cn_E(0)$ such that $\bigcup_{T \in \alg}T(V) \subset U$. Since $S$ is bounded, there exists $\lambda \in K$ such that $S \subset \lambda V$. Therefore $\bigcup_{T \in \alg}T(S) \subset \lambda U$, and $\alg$ is bounded in $B_\sigma(E; F)$.
\end{proof}
\begin{proposition}[{{\cite[IV.4.3]{SchaeferWolff}}}] \begin{proposition}[{{\cite[IV.4.3]{SchaeferWolff}}}]
\label{proposition:equicontinuous-linear-closure} \label{proposition:equicontinuous-linear-closure}
Let $E, F$ be TVSs over $K \in \RC$ and $\alg \subset L(E; F)$ be equicontinuous, and $\alg'$ be the closure of $\alg$ in $F^E$ with respect to the product topology, then $\alg'$ is equicontinuous and hence $\alg' \subset L(E; F)$. Let $E, F$ be TVSs over $K \in \RC$ and $\alg \subset L(E; F)$ be equicontinuous, and $\alg'$ be the closure of $\alg$ in $F^E$ with respect to the product topology, then $\alg'$ is equicontinuous and hence $\alg' \subset L(E; F)$.
@@ -29,7 +38,7 @@
Let $E, F$ be TVSs over $K \in \RC$ and $\alg \subset L(E; F)$. Suppose that one of the following holds: Let $E, F$ be TVSs over $K \in \RC$ and $\alg \subset L(E; F)$. Suppose that one of the following holds:
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item[(B)] $E$ is a Baire space. \item[(B)] $E$ is a Baire space.
\item[(B')] $E$ is barreled and $F$ is locally convex. \item[(B')] $E$ is barrelled and $F$ is locally convex.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
and that and that
@@ -86,7 +95,7 @@
Let $E, F, G$ be TVSs over $K \in \RC$ and $\alg$ be separately continuous bilinear maps from $E \times F$ to $G$. If one of the following holds: Let $E, F, G$ be TVSs over $K \in \RC$ and $\alg$ be separately continuous bilinear maps from $E \times F$ to $G$. If one of the following holds:
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item[(B)] $E$ is Baire. \item[(B)] $E$ is Baire.
\item[(B')] $E$ is barreled and $G$ is locally convex. \item[(B')] $E$ is barrelled and $G$ is locally convex.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
and that and that

View File

@@ -119,7 +119,5 @@
\] \]
by \hyperref[Fubini's theorem]{theorem:fubini-tonelli}. by \hyperref[Fubini's theorem]{theorem:fubini-tonelli}.
% TODO: Actually link Fubini once it's there.
\end{proof} \end{proof}

View File

@@ -36,8 +36,6 @@
Let $J \subset I$ be countable such that for each $k \in K$, there exists $j \in J$ with $V_n \subset U_j$, then $X = \bigcup_{k \in K}V_k = \bigcup_{j \in J}V_j$. Let $J \subset I$ be countable such that for each $k \in K$, there exists $j \in J$ with $V_n \subset U_j$, then $X = \bigcup_{k \in K}V_k = \bigcup_{j \in J}V_j$.
% TODO: This stuff may be moved to more general spaces.
(2) $\Rightarrow$ (3): Let $n \in \nat$, then $\bracs{B(x, 1/n)|x \in X}$ is an open cover of $X$, so there exists $\seq{x_{n, k}} \subset X$ such that $X = \bigcup_{k \in \natp}B(x_k, 1/n)$. Let $D = \bracs{x_{n, k}| n, k \in \natp}$, then for any $x \in X$ and $n \in \natp$, there exists $k \in \natp$ such that $x \in B(x_{n, k}, 1/n)$, so $x_{n, k} \in B(x, 1/n)$. Therefore $D$ is dense in $X$, and $X$ is separable. (2) $\Rightarrow$ (3): Let $n \in \nat$, then $\bracs{B(x, 1/n)|x \in X}$ is an open cover of $X$, so there exists $\seq{x_{n, k}} \subset X$ such that $X = \bigcup_{k \in \natp}B(x_k, 1/n)$. Let $D = \bracs{x_{n, k}| n, k \in \natp}$, then for any $x \in X$ and $n \in \natp$, there exists $k \in \natp$ such that $x \in B(x_{n, k}, 1/n)$, so $x_{n, k} \in B(x, 1/n)$. Therefore $D$ is dense in $X$, and $X$ is separable.
(3) $\Rightarrow$ (1): Let $\seq{x_n} \subset X$ be a countable dense subset. Let $x \in X$ and $k \in \natp$, then there exists $x_n \in \natp$ such that $d(x, x_n) < 1/(2k)$. In which case, $x \in B(x_n, 1/(2k)) \subset B(x_n, 1/k)$. Therefore $\bracs{B(x_n, 1/k)|n, k \in \natp}$ forms a countable basis for $X$. (3) $\Rightarrow$ (1): Let $\seq{x_n} \subset X$ be a countable dense subset. Let $x \in X$ and $k \in \natp$, then there exists $x_n \in \natp$ such that $d(x, x_n) < 1/(2k)$. In which case, $x \in B(x_n, 1/(2k)) \subset B(x_n, 1/k)$. Therefore $\bracs{B(x_n, 1/k)|n, k \in \natp}$ forms a countable basis for $X$.

View File

@@ -14,13 +14,13 @@
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item $\cf$ is equicontinuous at $x$. \item $\cf$ is equicontinuous at $x$.
\item For $\angles{x_\alpha}_{\alpha \in A} \subset X$ with $x_\alpha \to x$, $\angles{f_\alpha}_{\alpha \in A} \subset \cf$, and $U \in \fU$, there exists $\alpha_0 \in A$ such that $(f_\alpha(x_\alpha), f_\alpha(x)) \in U$ for all $\alpha \ge \alpha_0$. \item For $\angles{x_\alpha}_{\alpha \in A} \subset X$ with $x_\alpha \to x$, $\angles{f_\alpha}_{\alpha \in A} \subset \cf$, and $U \in \fU$, there exists $\alpha_0 \in A$ such that $(f_\alpha(x_\alpha), f_\alpha(x)) \in U$ for all $\alpha \ge \alpha_0$.
\item For any upward-directed set $A$ with $|A| \le |\cn_X(x)|$, $\angles{x_\alpha}_{\alpha \in A} \subset X$ with $x_\alpha \to x$, $\angles{f_\alpha}_{\alpha \in A} \subset \cf$, and $U \in \fU$, there exists $\alpha_0 \in A$ such that $(f_\alpha(x_\alpha), f_\alpha(x)) \in U$ for all $\alpha \ge \alpha_0$. \item There exists a fundamental system of neighbourhoods $\fB \subset \cn_X(x)$ at $x$ such that for any $\angles{x_V}_{V \in \fB} \subset X$ with $x_\alpha \to x$, $\angles{f_V}_{V \in \fB} \subset \cf$, and $U \in \fU$, there exists $V_0 \in \fB$ such that $(f_V(x_V), f_V(x)) \in U$ for all $V \subset V_0$.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
\end{proposition} \end{proposition}
\begin{proof} \begin{proof}
(1) $\Rightarrow$ (2): Since $\cf$ is equicontinuous at $x$, there exists $V \in \cn_X(x)$ such that $(f_\alpha(y), f_\alpha(x)) \in U$ for all $y \in V$ and $\alpha \in A$. Given that $x_\alpha \to x$, there exists $\alpha_0 \in A$ such that $x_\alpha \in V$ for all $\alpha \ge \alpha_0$, so $(f_\alpha(x_\alpha), f_\alpha(x)) \in U$ for all $\alpha \ge \alpha_0$. (1) $\Rightarrow$ (2): Since $\cf$ is equicontinuous at $x$, there exists $V \in \cn_X(x)$ such that $(f_\alpha(y), f_\alpha(x)) \in U$ for all $y \in V$ and $\alpha \in A$. Given that $x_\alpha \to x$, there exists $\alpha_0 \in A$ such that $x_\alpha \in V$ for all $\alpha \ge \alpha_0$, so $(f_\alpha(x_\alpha), f_\alpha(x)) \in U$ for all $\alpha \ge \alpha_0$.
$\neg (1) \Rightarrow \neg (3)$: Direct $\cn_X(x)$ under reverse inclusion. If $\cf$ is not equicontinuous at $x$, then there exists $U \in \fU$ such that for every $V \in \cn_X(x)$, there exists $f_V \in \cf$ and $x_V \in V$ with $(f_V(x_V), f_V(x)) \not\in U$. In which case, $x_V \to x$ but $(f_V(x_V), f_V(x)) \not\in U$ for all $V \in \cn_X(x)$. $\neg (1) \Rightarrow \neg (3)$: If $\cf$ is not equicontinuous at $x$, then there exists $U \in \fU$ such that for every $V \in \fB$, there exists $f_V \in \cf$ and $x_V \in V$ with $(f_V(x_V), f_V(x)) \not\in U$. In which case, $x_V \to x$ but $(f_V(x_V), f_V(x)) \not\in U$ for all $V \in \cn_X(x)$.
\end{proof} \end{proof}
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
then then
\begin{enumerate}[label=(C\arabic*)] \begin{enumerate}[label=(C\arabic*)]
\item The product uniformity and the compact uniformity on $\cf$ coincide. \item The uniform structures of pointwise and compact convergence on $\cf$ coincide.
\item The closure of $\cf$ in $Y^X$ with respect to the product topology is equicontinuous. \item The closure of $\cf$ in $Y^X$ with respect to the product topology is equicontinuous.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
@@ -49,7 +49,7 @@
then then
\begin{enumerate}[label=(C\arabic*), start=2] \begin{enumerate}[label=(C\arabic*), start=2]
\item $\cf$ is a precompact subset of $C(X; Y)$ with respect to the compact uniformity. \item $\cf$ is a precompact subset of $C(X; Y)$ with respect to the uniform structure of compact convergence.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
Conversely, if $X$ is a LCH space, then (C3) implies (E1) + (E2). Conversely, if $X$ is a LCH space, then (C3) implies (E1) + (E2).
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
\bigcap_{j = 1}^n E(\bracs{x_j}, U) \subset E(K, U \circ U \circ U) \bigcap_{j = 1}^n E(\bracs{x_j}, U) \subset E(K, U \circ U \circ U)
\] \]
so the product uniformity and the compact uniformity coincide. so the uniform structures of pointwise and compact convergence coincide.
(E1) $\Rightarrow$ (C2): Let $\cf'$ be the closure of $\cf$ in $Y^X$ with respect to the product topology. Let $x \in X$ and entourage $U$ of $Y$. Using \autoref{proposition:goodentourages}, assume without loss of generality that $U$ is closed. Since $\cf$ is equicontinuous, there exists $V \in \cn_X(x)$ such that $(f(x), f(y)) \in U$ for all $f \in \cf$ and $y \in V$. For any element $g \in \cf'$, $(g(x), g(y)) \in \ol U = U$ for all $y \in V$. Therefore $\cf'$ is also equicontinuous. (E1) $\Rightarrow$ (C2): Let $\cf'$ be the closure of $\cf$ in $Y^X$ with respect to the product topology. Let $x \in X$ and entourage $U$ of $Y$. Using \autoref{proposition:goodentourages}, assume without loss of generality that $U$ is closed. Since $\cf$ is equicontinuous, there exists $V \in \cn_X(x)$ such that $(f(x), f(y)) \in U$ for all $f \in \cf$ and $y \in V$. For any element $g \in \cf'$, $(g(x), g(y)) \in \ol U = U$ for all $y \in V$. Therefore $\cf'$ is also equicontinuous.
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
Therefore $g(W) \subset (U \circ U \circ U)(g(x))$, and $\cf$ is equicontinuous. Therefore $g(W) \subset (U \circ U \circ U)(g(x))$, and $\cf$ is equicontinuous.
(C3) $\Rightarrow$ (E2): Since the evaluation map is uniformly continuous with respect to the compact uniformity, $\cf(x)$ is totally bounded for all $x \in X$ by \autoref{proposition:totally-bounded-image}. (C3) $\Rightarrow$ (E2): Since the evaluation map is uniformly continuous with respect to the uniform structure of compact convergence, $\cf(x)$ is totally bounded for all $x \in X$ by \autoref{proposition:totally-bounded-image}.
\end{proof} \end{proof}