Compare commits
2 Commits
8efc71c1a1
...
ae2fc8147f
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
ae2fc8147f | ||
|
|
8a9ecc85f3 |
@@ -3,5 +3,6 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\input{./banach/index.tex}
|
||||
\input{./c-star/index.tex}
|
||||
\input{./vn/index.tex}
|
||||
\input{./example/index.tex}
|
||||
\input{./notation.tex}
|
||||
4
src/op/vn/index.tex
Normal file
4
src/op/vn/index.tex
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
|
||||
\chapter{Von Neumann Algebras}
|
||||
\label{chap:von-neumann-algebras}
|
||||
|
||||
\input{./topologies.tex}
|
||||
52
src/op/vn/topologies.tex
Normal file
52
src/op/vn/topologies.tex
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,52 @@
|
||||
\section{Topologies on $B(H)$}
|
||||
\label{section:topologies-on-bh}
|
||||
|
||||
Let $H$ be a complex Hilbert space. Thanks to its self-duality, there is a natural dual pairing
|
||||
\[
|
||||
B(H) \times (H \otimes H) \to \complex \quad \dpn{T, \phi \otimes x}{B(H)} = \dpn{Tx, \phi}{H}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
Depending on the topology placed on $H \otimes H$, and the corresponding completion, a handful of different topologies arise on $B(H)$. In fact, the above duality produces a predual for $B(H)$, being the trace class operators:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Ultraweak Topology]
|
||||
\label{definition:bh-ultraweak-topology}
|
||||
Let $H$ be a complex Hilbert space, then the dual of $H \wh \otimes_\pi H$ is $B(H)$, and the $\sigma(B(H), H \wh \otimes_\pi H)$-topology is the \textbf{ultraweak}/\textbf{$\sigma$-weak} topology on $B(H)$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
By \autoref{proposition:projective-tensor-product-dual}.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
Seeing that $B(H)$ is a dual Banach space, the following fact is immediate:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:bh-ultraweak-bounded}
|
||||
Let $H$ be a complex Hilbert space, then every bounded subset of $B(H)$ is relatively compact with respect to the ultraweak topology.
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
By the \hyperref[Banach-Alaoglu Theorem]{theorem:alaoglu}.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
Now, a few facts about the more familiar operator topologies:
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:bh-operator-topologies-facts}
|
||||
Let $H$ be a complex Hilbert space, then:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item The dual of $B(H)$ with respect to its strong and weak operator topologies is $H \otimes H$.
|
||||
\item Every bounded subset of $B(H)$ is relatively compact in the weak operator topology.
|
||||
\item The composition map $(S, T) \mapsto ST$ is separately continuous in the strong and weak operator topologies.
|
||||
\item For any bounded subset $B \subset B(H)$, the composition map $(S, T) \mapsto ST$ restricted to $B \times B(H)$ is continuous in the strong operator topology.
|
||||
\item The adjoint map $T \mapsto T^*$ is continuous in the weak operator topology and the ultraweak topology.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
(2): By \autoref{proposition:bh-ultraweak-bounded}.
|
||||
|
||||
(4): Let $\angles{S_\alpha}_{\alpha \in A} \subset B$, $\angles{T_\alpha}_{\alpha \in A} \subset B(H)$, and $(S, T) \in B \times B(H)$ such that $S_\alpha \to S$ and $T_\alpha \to T$ in the strong operator topology. Since $\{S_\alpha| \alpha \in A\}$ is equicontinuous, for any $x \in H$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\lim_{\alpha \in A} S_\alpha T_\alpha x = \lim_{\alpha \in A}S_\alpha Tx = \lim_{\alpha \in A}STx
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user