Compare commits
2 Commits
683b822e7e
...
26fdb527ce
| Author | SHA1 | Date | |
|---|---|---|---|
|
|
26fdb527ce | ||
|
|
35e9550ff2 |
@@ -6,6 +6,8 @@
|
||||
|
||||
Hi, welcome to my digital garden, where I collect math results that I learn.
|
||||
|
||||
Despite being presented in a linear order, I will frequently reference things between chapters and sections.
|
||||
|
||||
Occasionally, I make up some definitions to play with. These definition blocks will always have a * at the end of its title to indicate that it lives mostly in my head. These terms will always be referenced with a link to their definition block.
|
||||
|
||||
\input{./src/cat/index}
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -52,6 +52,15 @@
|
||||
(3): Since the inversion map is locally a power series, it is $C^\infty$ by \autoref{theorem:termwise-differentiation}.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{corollary}
|
||||
\label{corollary:invertible-boundary-explode}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital Banach algebra, $x \in A \setminus G(A)$, and $r > 0$, then $\normn{y^{-1}}_A > 1/r$ for all $y \in B(x, r) \cap G(A)$.
|
||||
\end{corollary}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Let $y \in B(x, r)$, then $B(y, \normn{y^{-1}}_A^{-1}) \subset G(A)$ by \autoref{proposition:banach-algebra-inverse}. Since $x \not\in G(A)$, $r > \norm{x - y}_A \ge \normn{y^{-1}}_A^{-1}$, and $1/r < \normn{y^{-1}}_A$.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:swap-invertible}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital Banach algebra and $x, y \in A$, then $1 - xy \in G(A)$ if and only if $1 - yx \in G(A)$.
|
||||
@@ -74,5 +83,3 @@
|
||||
\end{align*}
|
||||
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -146,4 +146,29 @@
|
||||
The above holds for $x$ and $y$ with respect to $\sigma_A$.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:spectrum-subalgebra-gymnastics}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital Banach algebra, $B \subset A$ be a closed subalgebra containing $1$, and $x \in B$, then:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item $\sigma_A(x) \subset \sigma_B(x)$.
|
||||
\item $\partial \sigma_B(x) \subset \sigma_A(x)$.
|
||||
\item $\sigma_B(x)$ is the union of $\sigma_A(x)$ and some bounded components of $\complex \setminus \sigma_A(x)$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
(1): $G(B) \subset G(A)$.
|
||||
|
||||
(2): Let $\lambda \in \partial \sigma_B(x)$, then there exists $\seq{\lambda_n} \subset \complex \setminus \sigma_B(x)$ such that $\lambda_n - x \in G(B)$ for all $n \in \natp$, and $\lambda_n \to \lambda$ as $n \to \infty$. By \autoref{corollary:invertible-boundary-explode}, $\norm{(\lambda_n - x)^{-1}}_A \to \infty$ as $n \to \infty$. If $\lambda - x \in G(A)$, then $(\lambda_n - x)^{-1} \to (\lambda - x)^{-1}$ as $n \to \infty$. Thus $\norm{(\lambda - x)^{-1}}_A = \infty$, which is impossible. Therefore $\lambda - x \not\in G(A)$, and $\lambda \in \sigma_A(x)$.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}["Runge's Theorem"]
|
||||
\label{theorem:spectrum-subalgebra-sufficiency}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital Banach algebra, $x \in A$, $P \subset \complex \setminus \sigma_A(x)$ such that $P$ intersects every bounded component of $\complex \setminus \sigma_A(x)$, and $B \subset A$ be a closed algebra containing $1$, $x$, and $\bracsn{(\lambda - x)^{-1}|\lambda \in P}$, then $\sigma_A(x) = \sigma_B(x)$.
|
||||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
\begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[Theorem 4.9]{MarcouxNotes}}}. ]
|
||||
By construction, $P \subset \complex \setminus \sigma_B(x)$. In addition, for any polynomial $p \in \complex[z]$, $p(x) \in B$. Thus for every rational function $f \in \complex(z) \cap H(\complex_\infty \setminus (P \cup \bracs{\infty}); \complex)$, $f(x) \in B$.
|
||||
|
||||
By \hyperref[Runge's Theorem]{theorem:runge}, $H(\complex_\infty \setminus (P \cup \bracs{\infty}); \complex)$ is dense in $H(\sigma_A(x); \complex)$. The continuity of the \hyperref[holomorphic functional calculus]{definition:holomorphic-functional-calculus} then implies that $f(x) \in B$ for all $f \in H(\sigma_A(x); \complex)$. In particular, $(\lambda - x)^{-1} \in B$ for all $\lambda \in \complex \setminus \sigma_A(x)$. Therefore $\sigma_B(x) \subset \sigma_A(x)$, and $\sigma_B(x) = \sigma_A(x)$ by \autoref{proposition:spectrum-subalgebra-gymnastics}.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
121
src/op/c-star/cont.tex
Normal file
121
src/op/c-star/cont.tex
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,121 @@
|
||||
\section{The Continuous Functional Calculus}
|
||||
\label{section:continuous-functional-calculus}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}[Spectral Theorem for $C^*$-Algebras]
|
||||
\label{theorem:spectral-c-star}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $x \in A$ be normal, then the mapping
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\Phi: \Omega(A[x]) \to \sigma_A(x) \quad \Phi(\psi) = \Gamma_{A[x]}(x)(\psi) = \psi(x)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
is a homeomorphism.
|
||||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Firstly, $A[x]$ is commutative by \autoref{proposition:generated-subalgebra-dense}. Thus \autoref{corollary:c-star-algebra-preserve-spectrum} and (3) of \autoref{proposition:gelfand-transform-gymnastics} imply that
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\Phi(\Omega(A[x])) = \Gamma_{A[x]}(\Omega(A[x])) = \sigma_{A[x]}(x) = \sigma_A(x)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
and $\Phi$ is a surjection onto $\sigma_A(x)$.
|
||||
|
||||
On the other hand, the \hyperref[Gelfand-Naimark Theorem]{theorem:gelfand-naimark} implies that $\Phi(x^*) = \ol{\Phi(x)}$, so since $A[x]$ is the smallest $C^*$-algebra containing $x$, any element $\psi \in \Omega(A[x])$ is uniquely determined by $\psi(x)$. Therefore $\Phi$ is injective.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, since $\Omega(A[x])$ is equipped with the weak* topology and $\Phi$ is the evaluation map at $x$, it is continuous.
|
||||
|
||||
By \autoref{proposition:compact-hausdorff-homeomorphism}, $\Phi$ is a homeomorphism.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Continuous Functional Calculus]
|
||||
\label{definition:continuous-functional-calculus}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $x \in A$ be normal, then there exists a unique continuous unital *-homomorphism
|
||||
\[
|
||||
C(\sigma_A(x); \complex) \to A[x] \quad f \mapsto f(x)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
such that:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item $\one(x) = 1_A$.
|
||||
\item $\text{Id}(x) = x$.
|
||||
\item $\overline{\text{Id}}(x) = x^*$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
Moreover,
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}[start=3]
|
||||
\item Under the identification $\Omega(A[x]) = \sigma_A(x)$, for each $f \in C(\sigma_A(x); \complex)$, $f(x) = \Gamma^{-1}_{A[x]}(f)$.
|
||||
\item The mapping $f \mapsto f(x)$ is a unital *-isomorphism.
|
||||
\item For each $U \subset \complex$ open and $f \in C(U; \complex)$, the mapping
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\bracs{x \in A|\sigma_A(x) \subset U} \to A \quad x \mapsto f(x)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
is continuous.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
(1), (4), (5): By the \hyperref[Spectral Theorem]{theorem:spectral-c-star}, $\Omega(A[x])$ and $\sigma_A(x)$ may be identified. For each $f \in C(\sigma_A(x); \complex)$, define $f(x) = \Gamma^{-1}_{A[x]}(f)$, then the mapping $f \mapsto f(x)$ is a unital *-isomorphism by the \hyperref[Gelfand-Naimark Theorem]{theorem:gelfand-naimark}.
|
||||
|
||||
(2): The identification
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\Phi: \Omega(A[x]) \to \sigma_A(x) \quad \Phi(\psi) = \Gamma_{A[x]}(x)(\psi) = \psi(x)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
given by the Spectral Theorem implies that $\Gamma_{A[x]}(x) = \text{Id}$.
|
||||
|
||||
(3): The mapping $f \mapsto f(x)$ is a *-homomorphism.
|
||||
|
||||
(6): Fix $x \in A$ and let $K \in \cn_U(\sigma_A(x); \complex)$ be compact. By \autoref{proposition:spectrum-continuous}, there exists $r > 0$ such that $\sigma_A(y) \subset K$ for all $y \in B_A(x, r)$.
|
||||
|
||||
Let $\eps > 0$. By the \hyperref[Stone-Weierstrass Theorem]{theorem:complex-stone-weierstrass}, there exists $p \in \complex[z, \ol z]$ such that $\sup_{\lambda \in K}|p(\lambda) - f(\lambda)| < \eps$. In which case,
|
||||
\begin{align*}
|
||||
\norm{f(x) - f(y)}_A &\le \norm{f(x) - p(x)}_A + \norm{f(y) - p(y)}_A + \norm{p(x) - p(y)}_A \\
|
||||
&\le \norm{p(x) - p(y)}_A + 2\eps
|
||||
\end{align*}
|
||||
|
||||
for all $y \in B_A(x, r)$. Since $p$ is a continuous map on $A$, there exists $\delta \in (0, r)$ such that $\norm{p(x) - p(y)}_A < \eps$ for all $y \in B_A(x, \delta)$. Therefore $\norm{f(x) - f(y)}_A < 3\eps$ for all $y \in B_A(x, \delta)$.
|
||||
|
||||
(Uniqueness): By the \hyperref[Stone-Weierstrass Theorem]{theorem:complex-stone-weierstrass}.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}[Spectral Mapping Theorem (Continuous)]
|
||||
\label{theorem:spectral-mapping-continuous}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $x \in A$ be normal, then:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item For every $f \in C(\sigma_A(x); \complex)$, $\sigma_A(f(x)) = f(\sigma_A(x))$.
|
||||
\item For every $f \in C(\sigma_A(x); \complex)$ and $g \in C(\sigma_A(f(x)); \complex)$, $(f \circ g)(x) = f(g(x))$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
(1): Since $f(x) \in A[x]$, by \autoref{proposition:gelfand-transform-gymnastics} and definition of the \hyperref[continuous functional calculus]{definition:continuous-functional-calculus},
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\sigma_A(f(x)) = \sigma_{A[x]}(f(x)) = \Gamma_{A[x]}(f(x))(\sigma_A(x)) = f(\sigma_A(x))
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
(2): Firstly, the theorem holds directly if $f, g \in \complex[z, \ol z]$ are polynomials in $z$ and $\ol z$.
|
||||
|
||||
Suppose that $g \in \complex[z, \ol z]$ but $f$ is arbitrary. By the \hyperref[Stone-Weierstrass Theorem]{theorem:complex-stone-weierstrass}, there exists $\seq{p_n} \subset \complex[z, \ol z]$ such that $p_n \to f$ uniformly on $\sigma_A(x)$. By property (6) of the \hyperref[continuous functional calculus]{definition:continuous-functional-calculus},
|
||||
\[
|
||||
(g \circ f)(x) = \limv{n}(g \circ f_n)(x) = \limv{n}g(f_n(x)) = \limv{n}g(f(x))
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, suppose that both $f$ and $g$ are arbitary. By the \hyperref[Stone-Weierstrass Theorem]{theorem:complex-stone-weierstrass}, there exists $\seq{p_n} \subset \complex[z, \ol z]$ such that $p_n \to g$ uniformly on $\sigma_A(f(x))$. By continuity of the continuous functional calculus,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
(g \circ f)(x) = \limv{n}(g_n \circ f)(x) = \limv{n}g_n(f(x)) = \limv{n}g(f(x))
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{corollary}
|
||||
\label{corollary:normal-spectrum-identity}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $x \in A$ be normal, then:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item $x$ is self-adjoint if and only if $\sigma(x) \subset \real$.
|
||||
\item $x$ is unitary if and only if $\sigma(x) \subset \partial B_\complex(0, 1)$.
|
||||
\item $x$ is a projection if and only if $\sigma(x) \subset \bracs{0, 1}$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{corollary}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,8 +2,10 @@
|
||||
\label{chap:c-star-algebras}
|
||||
|
||||
\input{./involution.tex}
|
||||
\input{./sub.tex}
|
||||
\input{./unitary.tex}
|
||||
\input{./sa.tex}
|
||||
\input{./order.tex}
|
||||
\input{./homomorphism.tex}
|
||||
\input{./gelfand.tex}
|
||||
\input{./gelfand.tex}
|
||||
\input{./cont.tex}
|
||||
\input{./order.tex}
|
||||
@@ -41,17 +41,4 @@
|
||||
(3): For any $x \in A$, $(x^{-1})^*x^* = (x^{-1}x)^* = 1 = (xx^{-1})^* = x^*(x^{-1})^*$.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[*-Homomorphism]
|
||||
\label{definition:star-homomorphism}
|
||||
Let $A, B$ be $C^*$-algebras and $\phi: A \to B$, then $\phi$ is a \textbf{*-homomorphism} if:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item $\phi$ is a homomorphism of Banach algebras.
|
||||
\item For every $x \in A$, $\phi(x^*) = \phi(x)^*$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
If in addition, $\phi(1) = 1$, then $\phi$ is a \textbf{unital *-homomorphism}.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -6,5 +6,54 @@
|
||||
Let $A$ be a $C^*$-algebra and $x \in A$, then $x$ is \textbf{positive} if there exists $y \in A$ such that $x = y^*y$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:positive-spectrum}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $x \in A$ be normal, then $x$ is positive if and only if $\sigma_A(x) \subset [0, \infty)$.
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Using the \hyperref[continuous functional calculus]{definition:continuous-functional-calculus}, $x$ is positive if and only if $\Gamma_{A[x]}(x) = \text{Id}$ is positive in $C(\sigma_A(x); \complex)$, if and only if $\sigma_A(x) = \Gamma_{A[x]}(x)(\Omega(A[x])) \subset [0, \infty)$ by \autoref{proposition:gelfand-transform-gymnastics}.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:positive-norm-inequality}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $x \in A_{sa}$, then the following are equivalent:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item $x$ is positive.
|
||||
\item $\sigma_A(x) \subset [0, \infty)$.
|
||||
\item There exists $\lambda \ge \norm{x}_A$ such that $\norm{\lambda - x}_A \le \lambda$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[Lemma II.11.3]{Zhu}}}. ]
|
||||
(1) $\Leftrightarrow$ (2): \autoref{proposition:positive-spectrum}.
|
||||
|
||||
(2) $\Leftrightarrow$ (3): By assumption, $\sigma_A(x) \subset \real$, so \autoref{theorem:c-star-normal-spectral-radius} implies that
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\norm{\lambda - x}_A = [\lambda - x]_{sp} = \sup\bracsn{\lambda - \mu|\mu\in \sigma_A(x)}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
which is bounded above by $\lambda$ if and only if $\sigma_A(x) \subset [0, \infty)$.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{corollary}
|
||||
\label{corollary:positive-ordering}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra. For each $x, y \in A$, denote $x \ge y$ if $x - y$ is positive, then $(A, \le)$ is an ordered vector space.
|
||||
\end{corollary}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
By definition, the ordering is reflexive, antisymmetric, translation-invariant, and invariant under scaling by positive constants. It remains to show that $\le$ is transitive, or equivalently, the sum of two positive elements is positive.
|
||||
|
||||
Let $x, y \in A$ be positive, then $x + y$ is self-adjoint. Thus there exists $\lambda \ge \norm{x}_A$ and $\mu \ge \norm{y}_A$ such that $\norm{\lambda - x}_A \le \lambda$ and $\norm{\mu - y}_A \le \mu$, so $\norm{(\lambda + \mu) - (x + y)}_A \le \lambda + \mu$, and $x + y$ is positive by \autoref{proposition:positive-norm-inequality}.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Positive Square Root]
|
||||
\label{definition:positive-square-root}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a $C^*$-algebra and $x \in A$ be positive, then there exists a unique positive element $y \in A$ such that $y^2 = x$. The element $y$ is the \textbf{positive square root} of $x$, denoted $\sqrt{x}$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Since $x$ is positive, $\sigma_A(x) \subset [0, \infty)$ by \autoref{proposition:positive-norm-inequality}. Therefore the square root function $f(t) = \sqrt{t}$ is defined and continuous on $\sigma_A(x)$. Using the \hyperref[continuous functional calculus]{definition:continuous-functional-calculus}, $f(x)$ is a positive element of $A$ such that $f(x)^2 = x$.
|
||||
|
||||
Let $y \in A$ such that $y^2 = x$, then by the \hyperref[Spectral Mapping Theorem]{theorem:spectral-mapping-continuous}, $y = f(y^2) = f(x)$, so the square root is unique.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
41
src/op/c-star/sub.tex
Normal file
41
src/op/c-star/sub.tex
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,41 @@
|
||||
\section{Subalgebras}
|
||||
\label{section:sub-c-star-algebras}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Generated Subalgebra]
|
||||
\label{definition:generated-subalgebra}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $S \subset A$, then $A[S]$ is the smallest $C^*$-subalgebra of $A$ containing $1$ and $S$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:generated-subalgebra-dense}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra, $S \subset A$, and $\mathcal{S} = S \cup \bracs{x^*|x \in S}$, then
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item The linear span
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\text{span}\bracs{\prod_{j = 1}^n x_j \bigg | \seqf{x_j} \subset \mathcal{S}}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
is dense in $A[S]$.
|
||||
\item If for any $x, y \in \mathcal{S}$, $xy = yx$, then $A[S]$ is commutative.
|
||||
\item For any normal element $x \in A$, $A[x]$ is commutative.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
% Obvious so omitted.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:c-star-algebra-preserve-gl}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra, $B \subset A$ be a $C^*$-subalgebra containing $1$, then $G(B) = G(A) \cap B$.
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Let $x \in G(A) \cap B$, then $x^*x \in G(A) \cap B$ as well. In particular, $0 \not\in \sigma_A(x^*x)$. Since $x^*x \in A_{sa}$, $\sigma_A(x^*x) \subset \real$ by \autoref{proposition:self-adjoint-spectrum}. By \autoref{proposition:spectrum-subalgebra-gymnastics}, $\partial \sigma_B(x^*x) \subset \sigma_A(x^*x) \subset \real$. Thus $\sigma_B(x^*x) \subset \real$ as well, which means that $\partial \sigma_B(x^*x) = \sigma_B(x^*x) = \sigma_A(x^*x)$. Therefore $0 \not\in \sigma_A(x^*x) = \sigma_B(x^*x)$, $x^*x \in G(B)$, and $x \in G(B)$.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{corollary}
|
||||
\label{corollary:c-star-algebra-preserve-spectrum}
|
||||
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra, $B \subset A$ be a $C^*$-subalgebra containing $1$, and $x \in B$, then $\sigma_A(x) = \sigma_B(x)$.
|
||||
\end{corollary}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
By \autoref{proposition:c-star-algebra-preserve-gl}.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -14,6 +14,7 @@
|
||||
$\Omega(A)$ & Space of multiplicative functionals on $A$. & \autoref{definition:multiplicative-functional} \\
|
||||
$\cm(A)$ & Maximal ideal space of $A$. & \autoref{definition:maximal-ideal} \\
|
||||
$\Gamma = \Gamma_A$ & The Gelfand transform on $A$. & \autoref{definition:gelfand-transform} \\
|
||||
$A[S]$ & $C^*$-subalgebra of $A$ generated by $S \subset A$. & \autoref{definition:generated-subalgebra} \\
|
||||
|
||||
$M_n(\complex)$ & Algebra of $n \times n$ matrices over $\complex$. & \autoref{definition:matrix-algebra} \\
|
||||
$B(H)$ & Algebra of bounded operators on a Hilbert space. & \autoref{definition:hilbert-endomorphism} \\
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user