Updated the existing system to accomodate scaffolds.
All checks were successful
Compile Project / Compile (push) Successful in 38s

This commit is contained in:
Bokuan Li
2026-06-29 17:43:02 -04:00
parent 3ba0eee08d
commit ff22fad2f8
6 changed files with 128 additions and 118 deletions

View File

@@ -176,5 +176,10 @@
"scope": "latex",
"prefix": "cproof",
"body": ["[Proof, {{\\cite[$1]{$2}}}. ]$0"]
},
"Scaffold": {
"scope": "latex",
"prefix": "scaf",
"body": ["\\hyperref[scaffolded]{definition:measure-scaffold}$0"]
}
}

View File

@@ -74,65 +74,6 @@
On the other hand, if $\mu\bracs{d(f, g) > \eps} \le \eps$, then $d(f, g) \le \eps$. Therefore $\alpha$ induces the uniform structure of convergence in measure.
\end{proof}
\begin{definition}[Locally In Measure]
\label{definition:locally-in-measure}
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space and $(Y, d)$ be a separable metric space. For each $\eps, \delta > 0$ and $A \in \cm$ with $\mu(A) < \infty$, let
\[
U(A, \delta, \eps) = \bracs{(f, g) \in \mathcal{L}^0(X; Y)| \mu(A \cap \bracs{d(f, g) > \delta}) < \eps}
\]
then
\[
\fB = \bracs{U(A, \delta, \eps)|\eps, \delta > 0, A \in \cm, \mu(A) < \infty}
\]
forms a fundamental system of entourages for a uniformity. The uniformity induced by $\fB$ is the \textbf{uniform structure of local convergence in measure} on $\mathcal{L}^0(X; Y)$.
\end{definition}
\begin{proof}
It is sufficient to check the conditions of \autoref{proposition:fundamental-entourage-criterion}:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(FB1)] For each $\eps, \eps', \delta, \delta' > 0$ and $A, A' \in \cm$ with $\mu(A), \mu(A') < \infty$,
\[
U(A \cup A', \delta \wedge \delta', \eps \wedge \eps') \subset U(A, \delta, \eps) \cap U(A', \delta', \eps')
\]
\item[(UB3)] For each $\eps, \delta > 0$, $A \in \cm$ with $\mu(A) < \infty$, and $f, g, h \in \mathcal{L}^0(X; Y)$,
\[
\bracs{d(f, h) > \delta} \subset \bracs{d(f, g) > \delta} \cup \bracs{d(g, h) > \delta}
\]
so $U(A, \delta/2, \eps/2) \circ U(A, \delta/2, \eps/2) \subset U(A, \delta, \eps)$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{proof}
\begin{proposition}
\label{proposition:convergence-in-measure}
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a semifinite measure space, $(Y, d)$ be a separable metric space, and $\fF$ be a filter of $(\cm, \cb_Y)$-measurable functions, then $\fF$ is Cauchy in measure if and only if:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(L)] $\fF$ is locally Cauchy in measure.
\item[(T)] For each $\eps, \delta > 0$, there exists $F \in \fF$ and $A \in \cm$ with $\mu(A) < \infty$ such that
\[
\sup_{f, g \in F}\mu(A^c \cap \bracs{d(f, g) > \delta}) < \eps
\]
\end{enumerate}
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
(L) + (T) $\Rightarrow$ (In Measure): Let $\eps, \delta > 0$. By (T) then there exists $F_1 \in \fF$ and $A \in \cm$ with $\mu(A) < \infty$ such that
\[
\sup_{f, g \in F_1}\mu(A^c \cap \bracs{d(f, g) > \delta}) < \eps
\]
By (L), there exists $F_2 \in \fF$ with $F_2 \subset F_1$ such that
\[
\sup_{f, g \in F_2}\mu(A \cap \bracs{d(f, g) > \delta}) < \eps
\]
Therefore
\[
\sup_{f, g \in F_2}\mu\bracs{d(f, g) > \delta} < 2\eps
\]
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma:ae-in-measure}
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a finite measure space, $(Y, d)$ be a separable metric space, and $\seq{f_n}$ and $f$ be Borel measurable functions from $X$ to $Y$ such that $f_n \to f$ almost everywhere, then $f_n \to f$ in measure.
@@ -157,7 +98,7 @@
\item $L^0(X; Y)$ equipped with the uniform structure of convergence in measure is complete.
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}[Proof, [{{\cite[Theorem 2.30]{Folland}}}]. ]
\begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[Theorem 2.30]{Folland}}}. ]
(1): Since $\seq{f_n}$ is Cauchy in measure, there exists a subsequence $\seq{n_k}$ such that for each $k \in \natp$, $\mu(\bracsn{d(f_{n_k}, f_{n_{k+1}}) > 2^{-k}}) \le 2^{-k}$.
In this case, for any $K \in \natp$ and $j \ge k \ge K$,
@@ -196,48 +137,3 @@
(2): Since the uniform structure of convergence in measure on $L^0(X; Y)$ is defined by the \hyperref[Ky Fan metric]{definition:ky-fan}, completeness follows from (1) and \autoref{proposition:complete-metric-space}.
\end{proof}
\begin{theorem}[Monotone Convergence Theorem (in Measure)]
\label{theorem:mct-measure}
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a semifinite measure space, $\net{f} \subset \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$, and $f \in \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$ such that
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item For each $x \in X$, $f_\alpha(x) \upto f(x)$.
\item $f_\alpha \to f$ locally in measure.
\end{enumerate}
then
\[
\lim_{\alpha \in A}\int f_\alpha d\mu = \int f d\mu
\]
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
By \autoref{definition:lebesgue-non-negative}, $\int f_\alpha d\mu \le \int f d\mu$ for each $\alpha \in A$.
On the other hand, using \autoref{lemma:lebesgue-non-negative-strict}, it is sufficient to show that
\[
\lim_{\alpha \in A}\int f_\alpha d\mu = \sup_{\alpha \in A}\int f_\alpha d\mu \ge \int \phi d\mu
\]
for any $\phi \in \Sigma^+(X, \cm)$ satisfying:
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\roman*)]
\item There exists $\delta > 0$ such that $\phi + \delta \le f$ on $\bracs{\phi > 0}$.
\item $\phi \in L^1(X, \cm)$.
\end{enumerate}
To this end, let $\eps > 0$. Since $\mu\bracs{\phi > 0} < \infty$, by (b), there exists $\alpha \in A$ such that
\[
\mu\bracs{\phi > 0, f_\alpha + \delta < \phi} \le \mu\bracs{\phi > 0, f_\alpha + \delta < f} < \frac{\eps}{\norm{\phi}_u}
\]
In which case, by \hyperref[linearity]{proposition:lebesgue-simple-properties},
\begin{align*}
\int \phi d\mu &= \int_{\bracs{\phi > 0}}\phi d\mu = \int_{\bracs{\phi > 0, f_\alpha + \delta \ge \phi}} \phi d\mu + \int_{\bracs{\phi > 0, f_\alpha + \delta < \phi}} \phi d\mu \\
&\le \int_{\bracs{\phi > 0, f_\alpha + \delta \ge \phi}} f_\alpha d\mu +\norm{\phi}_u\mu \bracs{\phi > 0, f_\alpha + \delta < \phi} \\
&\le \int f_\alpha d\mu + \norm{\phi}_u \frac{\eps}{\norm{\phi}_u} = \int f_\alpha d\mu + \eps
\end{align*}
As the above holds for all $\eps > 0$, $\int \phi d\mu \le \sup_{\alpha \in A}\int f_\alpha d\mu$. Therefore
\[
\int f d\mu = \sup_{\alpha \in A}\int f_\alpha d\mu = \lim_{\alpha \in A}\int f_\alpha d\mu
\]
\end{proof}

View File

@@ -8,3 +8,4 @@
\input{./metric.tex}
\input{./approx.tex}
\input{./in-measure.tex}
\input{./locally-in-measure.tex}

View File

@@ -0,0 +1,116 @@
\section{Local Convergence in Measure}
\label{section:locally-in-measure}
\begin{definition}[Locally In Measure*]
\label{definition:locally-in-measure}
Let $(X, \cm, \cf, \mu)$ be a \hyperref[scaffolded]{definition:measure-scaffold} measure space and $(Y, d)$ be a separable metric space. For each $\eps, \delta > 0$ and $A \in \cf$, let
\[
U(A, \delta, \eps) = \bracs{(f, g) \in \mathcal{L}^0(X; Y)| \mu(A \cap \bracs{d(f, g) > \delta}) < \eps}
\]
then
\[
\fB = \bracs{U(A, \delta, \eps)|\eps, \delta > 0, A \in \cm, \mu(A) < \infty}
\]
forms a fundamental system of entourages for a uniformity.
The uniformity defined by $\fB$ is the \textbf{uniform structure of local convergence in measure}, and $\mathcal{L}_\cf^0(X; Y)$ denotes $\mathcal{L}^0(X; Y)$ equipped with this uniformity.
\end{definition}
\begin{proof}
It is sufficient to check the conditions of \autoref{proposition:fundamental-entourage-criterion}:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(FB1)] For each $\eps, \eps', \delta, \delta' > 0$ and $A, A' \in \cm$ with $\mu(A), \mu(A') < \infty$,
\[
U(A \cup A', \delta \wedge \delta', \eps \wedge \eps') \subset U(A, \delta, \eps) \cap U(A', \delta', \eps')
\]
\item[(UB3)] For each $\eps, \delta > 0$, $A \in \cf$, and $f, g, h \in \mathcal{L}^0(X; Y)$,
\[
\bracs{d(f, h) > \delta} \subset \bracs{d(f, g) > \delta} \cup \bracs{d(g, h) > \delta}
\]
so $U(A, \delta/2, \eps/2) \circ U(A, \delta/2, \eps/2) \subset U(A, \delta, \eps)$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{proof}
\begin{proposition}
\label{proposition:convergence-in-measure}
Let $(X, \cm, \cf, \mu)$ be a \hyperref[scaffolded]{definition:measure-scaffold} measure space, $(Y, d)$ be a separable metric space, and $\fF$ be a filter of $(\cm, \cb_Y)$-measurable functions, then $\fF$ is Cauchy in measure if and only if:
\begin{enumerate}
\item[(L)] $\fF$ is \hyperref[definition:locally-in-measure]{definition:locally-in-measure}.
\item[(T)] For each $\eps, \delta > 0$, there exists $F \in \fF$ and $A \in \cf$ such that
\[
\sup_{f, g \in F}\mu(A^c \cap \bracs{d(f, g) > \delta}) < \eps
\]
\end{enumerate}
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
(L) + (T) $\Rightarrow$ (In Measure): Let $\eps, \delta > 0$. By (T) then there exists $F_1 \in \fF$ and $A \in \cf$ such that
\[
\sup_{f, g \in F_1}\mu(A^c \cap \bracs{d(f, g) > \delta}) < \eps
\]
By (L), there exists $F_2 \in \fF$ with $F_2 \subset F_1$ such that
\[
\sup_{f, g \in F_2}\mu(A \cap \bracs{d(f, g) > \delta}) < \eps
\]
Therefore
\[
\sup_{f, g \in F_2}\mu\bracs{d(f, g) > \delta} < 2\eps
\]
\end{proof}
\begin{theorem}
\label{theorem:locally-in-measure-complete}
Let $(X, \cm, \cf, \mu)$ be a \hyperref[scaffolded]{definition:measure-scaffold} localisable measure space and $(Y, d)$ be a Polish space, then \hyperref[$\mathcal{L}^0_\cf(X; Y)$]{definition:locally-in-measure} is complete.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
Let $\fF \subset \mathcal{L}^0_\cf(X; Y)$ be a Cauchy filter. By \autoref{theorem:cauchy-in-measure-limit}, for each $A \in \cf$, there exists an almost everywhere unique $f_A \in \mathcal{L}^0(A; Y)$ such that $\fF$ converges to $f_A$ when restricted to $A$. Thus for any $A, B \in \cf$, $f_{A \cup B}|_{A \cap B} = f_A|_{A \cap B} = f_B|_{B \cap A}$ almost everywhere. By the \hyperref[gluing lemma for measurable functions]{lemma:gluing-measurable}, there exists $f \in \mathcal{L}^0(X; Y)$ such that $f|_A = f_A$ for all $A \in \cf$. Thus $\fF \to f$ locally in measure, and $\mathcal{L}^0(X; Y)$ is complete.
\end{proof}
\begin{theorem}[Monotone Convergence Theorem (in Measure)]
\label{theorem:mct-measure}
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a semifinite measure space, $\net{f} \subset \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$, and $f \in \mathcal{L}^+(X, \cm)$ such that
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
\item For each $x \in X$, $f_\alpha(x) \upto f(x)$.
\item $f_\alpha \to f$ locally in measure.
\end{enumerate}
then
\[
\lim_{\alpha \in A}\int f_\alpha d\mu = \int f d\mu
\]
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
By \autoref{definition:lebesgue-non-negative}, $\int f_\alpha d\mu \le \int f d\mu$ for each $\alpha \in A$.
On the other hand, using \autoref{lemma:lebesgue-non-negative-strict}, it is sufficient to show that
\[
\lim_{\alpha \in A}\int f_\alpha d\mu = \sup_{\alpha \in A}\int f_\alpha d\mu \ge \int \phi d\mu
\]
for any $\phi \in \Sigma^+(X, \cm)$ satisfying:
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\roman*)]
\item There exists $\delta > 0$ such that $\phi + \delta \le f$ on $\bracs{\phi > 0}$.
\item $\phi \in L^1(X, \cm)$.
\end{enumerate}
To this end, let $\eps > 0$. Since $\mu\bracs{\phi > 0} < \infty$, by (b), there exists $\alpha \in A$ such that
\[
\mu\bracs{\phi > 0, f_\alpha + \delta < \phi} \le \mu\bracs{\phi > 0, f_\alpha + \delta < f} < \frac{\eps}{\norm{\phi}_u}
\]
In which case, by \hyperref[linearity]{proposition:lebesgue-simple-properties},
\begin{align*}
\int \phi d\mu &= \int_{\bracs{\phi > 0}}\phi d\mu = \int_{\bracs{\phi > 0, f_\alpha + \delta \ge \phi}} \phi d\mu + \int_{\bracs{\phi > 0, f_\alpha + \delta < \phi}} \phi d\mu \\
&\le \int_{\bracs{\phi > 0, f_\alpha + \delta \ge \phi}} f_\alpha d\mu +\norm{\phi}_u\mu \bracs{\phi > 0, f_\alpha + \delta < \phi} \\
&\le \int f_\alpha d\mu + \norm{\phi}_u \frac{\eps}{\norm{\phi}_u} = \int f_\alpha d\mu + \eps
\end{align*}
As the above holds for all $\eps > 0$, $\int \phi d\mu \le \sup_{\alpha \in A}\int f_\alpha d\mu$. Therefore
\[
\int f d\mu = \sup_{\alpha \in A}\int f_\alpha d\mu = \lim_{\alpha \in A}\int f_\alpha d\mu
\]
\end{proof}

View File

@@ -184,9 +184,9 @@
\item For each $A \in \cf$, $f_n|_A = f_{A, n}$ almost everywhere.
\end{enumerate}
Since $Y$ is Polish, \autoref{proposition:metric-measurable-limit} implies that $\bracsn{\limv{n}f_n \text{ exists}} \in \cm$. For each $A \in \cf$, $f_{A, n} \to f_n$ pointwise by (i). For each$n \in \natp$, $f_{A, n} = f_n|_A$ almost everywhere on $A$ by (2). Thus
Since $Y$ is Polish, \autoref{proposition:metric-measurable-limit} implies that $\bracsn{\limv{n}f_n \text{ exists}} \in \cm$. For each $A \in \cf$, $f_{A, n} \to f_A$ pointwise by (i). For each$n \in \natp$, $f_{A, n} = f_n|_A$ almost everywhere on $A$ by (2). Thus
\begin{align*}
\bracs{\limv{n}f_n \text{ exists}} \cap A &\subset \bigcap_{n \in \natp}\bracs{f_{A, n} = f_n|_A} \\
\bracs{\limv{n}f_n \text{ exists}} \cap A &\supset \bigcap_{n \in \natp}\bracs{f_{A, n} = f_n|_A} \\
\mu\paren{\bracs{\limv{n}f_n \text{ exists}} \cap A} &= \mu\paren{\bigcap_{n \in \natp}\bracs{f_{A, n} = f_n|_{A}}} = \mu(A) \\
\mu\paren{\bracs{\limv{n}f_n \text{ does not exist}} \cap A} &= 0
\end{align*}

View File

@@ -63,23 +63,15 @@
\begin{definition}[Scaffold*]
\label{definition:measure-scaffold}
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space and $\cf \subset \bracs{A \in \cm|\mu(A) < \infty}$, then $\cf$ is a \textbf{scaffold} for $\mu$ if for all $E \in \cm$,
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space and $\cf \subset \bracs{A \in \cm|\mu(A) < \infty}$ be an ideal, then $\cf$ is a \textbf{scaffold} for $\mu$ if for all $E \in \cm$,
\[
\mu(E) = \sup\bracs{\mu(E \cap A)|A \in \cf}
\]
and the quadruple $(X, \cm, \cf, \mu)$ is a \textbf{scaffolded measure space}.
\end{definition}
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma:measure-scaffold-semifinite}
Let $(X, \cm, \mu)$ be a measure space:
\begin{enumerate}
\item If $\cf \subset \cm$ is a \hyperref[scaffold]{definition:measure-scaffold} for $\mu$, then $\mu$ is semifinite.
\item If $\mu$ is semifinite, then $\bracs{A \in \cm|\mu(A) < \infty}$ is a scaffold for $\mu$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}
% Omitted
For any semifinite measure space $(X, \cm, \mu)$, $\cf = \bracs{A \in \cm|\mu(A) < \infty}$ is the \textbf{canonical scaffold} for $\mu$, and $(X, \cm, \mu)$ will be equipped with this scaffold unless specified otherwise.
\end{definition}
\begin{example}
Let $X$ be a LCH space, $\mu$ be a Radon measure, and $\mathcal{K}$ be the collection of compact subsets of $X$, then $\mathcal{K}$ is a scaffold for $\mu$.