Fixed typo.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
By Zorn's lemma, $\mathbf{F}$ admits a maximal element $\Phi$. If $\cd(\Phi) \subsetneq E$, then $\Phi$ is not maximal by the preceding discussion. Therefore $\cd(\Phi) = E$ and $\Phi$ is a desired extension.
|
By Zorn's lemma, $\mathbf{F}$ admits a maximal element $\Phi$. If $\cd(\Phi) \subsetneq E$, then $\Phi$ is not maximal by the preceding discussion. Therefore $\cd(\Phi) = E$ and $\Phi$ is a desired extension.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(1): Given that $\rho$ is a seminorm, for any $u \in \hom(E; \real)$, $u \le \rho$ if and only if $\abs{u} \le \rho$.
|
(2): Given that $\rho$ is a seminorm, for any $u \in \hom(E; \real)$, $u \le \rho$ if and only if $\abs{u} \le \rho$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Let $u = \re{\phi}$, then $u \in \hom(E; \real)$ by \ref{proposition:polarisation-linear}. By (1), there exists $U \in \hom(E; \real)$ such that $\abs{U} \le \rho$ and $U|_F = u$. For each $x \in E$, let $\Phi(x) = U(x) - iU(ix)$, then $\Phi \in \hom(E; \complex)$ and $\Phi|_F = \phi$ by \ref{proposition:polarisation-linear}. In addition, for any $x \in E$, if $\alpha = \overline{\sgn(\Phi(x))}$, then
|
Let $u = \re{\phi}$, then $u \in \hom(E; \real)$ by \ref{proposition:polarisation-linear}. By (1), there exists $U \in \hom(E; \real)$ such that $\abs{U} \le \rho$ and $U|_F = u$. For each $x \in E$, let $\Phi(x) = U(x) - iU(ix)$, then $\Phi \in \hom(E; \complex)$ and $\Phi|_F = \phi$ by \ref{proposition:polarisation-linear}. In addition, for any $x \in E$, if $\alpha = \overline{\sgn(\Phi(x))}$, then
|
||||||
\[
|
\[
|
||||||
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
|
|||||||
|
|
||||||
For any $y \in A \cap (-A)$,
|
For any $y \in A \cap (-A)$,
|
||||||
\[
|
\[
|
||||||
\dpb{y, \phi}{E} \le [y]_A \le 1 \quad -\dpb{y, \phi}{E} \le [-y]_A < 1
|
\dpb{y, \phi}{E} \le [y]_A < 1 \quad -\dpb{y, \phi}{E} \le [-y]_A < 1
|
||||||
\]
|
\]
|
||||||
so $\phi \in E^*$.
|
so $\phi \in E^*$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user