Moved Stinespring.
This commit is contained in:
Bokuan Li
+109
-107
@@ -47,113 +47,6 @@
|
|||||||
Similarly, if $(K, S)$ is a power dilation of $T$ and $(L, T)$ is a power dilation of $S$, then $(L, T)$ is a power dilation of $R$.
|
Similarly, if $(K, S)$ is a power dilation of $T$ and $(L, T)$ is a power dilation of $S$, then $(L, T)$ is a power dilation of $R$.
|
||||||
\end{lemma}
|
\end{lemma}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{theorem}[Stinespring's Dilation Theorem]
|
|
||||||
\label{theorem:stinespring-dilation}
|
|
||||||
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra, $H$ be a complex Hilbert space, and $\phi: A \to B(H)$ be a completely positive map, then there exists a triple $(K, V, \pi)$, where:
|
|
||||||
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
|
|
||||||
\item $K$ is a complex Hilbert space.
|
|
||||||
\item $V: H \to K$ is a continuous linear map.
|
|
||||||
\item $\pi: A \to B(K)$ is a unital *-homomorphism.
|
|
||||||
\end{enumerate}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
such that:
|
|
||||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
|
||||||
\item $\norm{\phi(1_A)}_{B(H)} = \norm{V}_{L(H; K)}^2$.
|
|
||||||
\item For all $a \in A$, $\phi(a) = V^*\phi(a)V$.
|
|
||||||
\end{enumerate}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Moreover, if $\phi$ is unital, then:
|
|
||||||
\begin{enumerate}[start=2]
|
|
||||||
\item $V$ is an isometry.
|
|
||||||
\item Under the identification that $H = V(H) \subset K$, $(K, \pi(a))$ is a dilation of $\phi(a)$ for all $a \in A$.
|
|
||||||
\end{enumerate}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
The triple $(K, V, \pi)$ is a \textbf{Stinespring representation} of $\phi$. If $\bracsn{\pi(a)VH|a \in A}$ is dense in $K$, then $(K, V, \pi)$ is \textbf{minimal}.
|
|
||||||
\end{theorem}
|
|
||||||
\begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[Theorem 4.1]{Paulsen}}}. ]
|
|
||||||
(a): Let $A \otimes H$ and define the Hermitian form
|
|
||||||
\[
|
|
||||||
\dpn{\cdot, \cdot}{\phi}: (A \otimes H) \times (A \otimes H)\to \complex \quad \dpn{a \otimes \xi, b \otimes \eta}{\phi} = \dpn{\phi(b^*a)\xi, \eta}{H}
|
|
||||||
\]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
For each $\sum_{j = 1}^n a_j \otimes \xi_j \in A \otimes H$, let $\xi = (\xi_1, \cdots, \xi_n) \in H^n$ and
|
|
||||||
\[
|
|
||||||
a = \sum_{i, j = 1}^n E_{ij} \otimes a_{i}^* a_j = \braks{\sum_{i = 1}^n E_{1i} \otimes a_{i}}^*\braks{\sum_{j = 1}^n E_{1j} \otimes a_j} \ge 0
|
|
||||||
\]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
then since $\phi$ is completely positive,
|
|
||||||
\[
|
|
||||||
\angles{\sum_{j = 1}^n a_j \otimes \xi_j, \sum_{j = 1}^n a_j \otimes \xi_j}_\phi = \sum_{i, j = 1}^n \dpn{\phi(a_i^*a_j)\xi_j, \xi_i}{H} = \dpn{\phi_n(a)\xi, \xi}{H^n} \ge 0
|
|
||||||
\]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
and $\dpn{\cdot, \cdot}{\phi}$ is a pseudo-inner product.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Let $N = \bracsn{u \in A \otimes H| \dpn{u, u}{\phi} = 0}$. For any $u \in N$ and $v \in A \otimes H$, by the \hyperref[Cauchy-Schwarz inequality]{proposition:cauchy-schwarz},
|
|
||||||
\[
|
|
||||||
\dpn{u, v}{\phi}| \le \dpn{u, u}{\phi}^{1/2} \dpn{v, v}{\phi}^{1/2} = 0
|
|
||||||
\]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
so $N = \bracsn{u \in A \otimes H|\dpn{u, v}{\phi} = 0 \forall v \in K_0}$.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
Let $K_0 = (A \otimes H)/N$ and $K$ be the completion of $K_0$ with respect to $\dpn{\cdot, \cdot}{\phi}$, then $K$ is a complex Hilbert space.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(b): Let $V: H \to K_0$ be defined by $\xi \mapsto 1_A \otimes \xi + N$, then for each $\xi \in H$,
|
|
||||||
\[
|
|
||||||
\norm{V\xi}_{K_0}^2 = \dpn{1_A \otimes \xi, 1_A \otimes \xi}{\phi} = \dpn{\phi(1_A)\xi, \xi}{H} \le \norm{\phi(1_A)}_{B(H)}\norm{\xi}_H^2
|
|
||||||
\]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
so $\norm{V}_{L(H; K)}^2 \le \norm{\phi(1_A)}_{B(H)}$.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(c): For each $a \in A$, let
|
|
||||||
\[
|
|
||||||
\pi(a): K_0 \to K_0 \quad \pi(a)(b \otimes \xi + N) = (ab) \otimes \xi + N
|
|
||||||
\]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
then for any $u = \sum_{j = 1}^n b_j \otimes \xi_j \in A \otimes H$,
|
|
||||||
\begin{align*}
|
|
||||||
\norm{\pi(a)(u+N)}_{K_0}^2 &= \sum_{i, j = 1}^n \dpn{(ab_j) \otimes \xi_j, b_i \otimes \xi_i}{\phi} = \sum_{i, j = 1}^n \dpn{\phi(b_i^*a^*ab_j)\xi_j, \xi_i}{H} \\
|
|
||||||
&\le \sum_{i, j = 1}^n \norm{a^*a}_A \dpn{\phi(b_i^*b_j)\xi_j, \xi_i}{H} = \norm{a}_A^2 \cdot \norm{u + N}_{K_0}^2
|
|
||||||
\end{align*}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
so $\norm{\pi(a)}_{B(K_0)} \le \norm{a}_A$. By the \hyperref[Linear Extension Theorem]{theorem:linear-extension-theorem-normed}, $\pi(a)$ extends uniquely to an operator in $B(H)$, and $\pi: A \to B(H)$ is a bounded linear map.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
By definition, $\pi$ is a unital homomorphism of Banach algebras. Finally, for any $a \in A$ and $b \otimes \xi, c \otimes \eta \in A \otimes H$,
|
|
||||||
\begin{align*}
|
|
||||||
\dpn{\pi(a^*)(b \otimes \xi + N), c \otimes \eta + N}{K_0} &= \dpn{(a^*b) \otimes \xi, c \otimes \eta}{\phi}\\
|
|
||||||
&= \dpn{\phi(c^*a^*b)\xi, \eta}{H} = \dpn{b \otimes \xi, (ac) \otimes \eta}{\phi} \\
|
|
||||||
&= \dpn{b \otimes \xi + N, \pi(a)(c \otimes \eta + N)}{K_0}
|
|
||||||
\end{align*}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
By linearity, $\dpn{\pi(a^*)u, v}{K_0} = \dpn{u, \pi(a)v}{K_0}$ for all $u, v \in K_0$. As $K_0$ is dense in $K$, $\pi(a^*) = \pi(a)^*$, so $\pi$ is a unital *-homomorphism.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(1): For each $\xi \in H$,
|
|
||||||
\[
|
|
||||||
\norm{V\xi}_{K_0}^2 = \dpn{1_A \otimes \xi, 1_A \otimes \xi}{\phi} = \dpn{\phi(1_A)\xi, \xi}{H}
|
|
||||||
\]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
so
|
|
||||||
\[
|
|
||||||
\norm{V}_{K_0}^2 = \sup_{\substack{\xi \in H \\ \norm{\xi}_H \le 1}}\norm{V\xi}_{K_0}^2 = \sup_{\substack{\xi \in H \\ \norm{\xi}_H \le 1}}\dpn{\phi(1_A)\xi, \xi}{H} = w(\phi(1_A)) = \norm{\phi(1_A)}_{B(H)}
|
|
||||||
\]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
by \autoref{proposition:bh-numerical-radius-gymnastics}.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(2): For each $a \in A$ and $\xi, \eta \in H$,
|
|
||||||
\[
|
|
||||||
\dpn{V^*\pi(a)V\xi, \eta}{H} = \dpn{\pi(a)V\xi, V\eta}{K} = \dpn{a \otimes \xi, 1_A \otimes \eta}{\phi} = \dpn{\phi(a)\xi, \eta}{H}
|
|
||||||
\]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
so $V^*\pi(a)V = \phi(a)$.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(3): If $\phi$ is unital, then for each $\xi \in H$,
|
|
||||||
\[
|
|
||||||
\dpn{V\xi, V\xi}{H} = \dpn{1_A \otimes \xi, 1_A \otimes \xi}{\phi} = \dpn{\phi(1_A)\xi, \xi}{H} = \dpn{\xi, \xi}{H}
|
|
||||||
\]
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
so $V$ is an isometry.
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\end{proof}
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{theorem}[Sz.-Nagy's Dilation Theorem]
|
\begin{theorem}[Sz.-Nagy's Dilation Theorem]
|
||||||
\label{theorem:sznagy-dilation}
|
\label{theorem:sznagy-dilation}
|
||||||
@@ -393,3 +286,112 @@
|
|||||||
by (3).
|
by (3).
|
||||||
\end{proof}
|
\end{proof}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{theorem}[Stinespring's Dilation Theorem]
|
||||||
|
\label{theorem:stinespring-dilation}
|
||||||
|
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra, $H$ be a complex Hilbert space, and $\phi: A \to B(H)$ be a completely positive map, then there exists a triple $(K, V, \pi)$, where:
|
||||||
|
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
|
||||||
|
\item $K$ is a complex Hilbert space.
|
||||||
|
\item $V: H \to K$ is a continuous linear map.
|
||||||
|
\item $\pi: A \to B(K)$ is a unital *-homomorphism.
|
||||||
|
\end{enumerate}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
such that:
|
||||||
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||||
|
\item $\norm{\phi(1_A)}_{B(H)} = \norm{V}_{L(H; K)}^2$.
|
||||||
|
\item For all $a \in A$, $\phi(a) = V^*\phi(a)V$.
|
||||||
|
\end{enumerate}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Moreover, if $\phi$ is unital, then:
|
||||||
|
\begin{enumerate}[start=2]
|
||||||
|
\item $V$ is an isometry.
|
||||||
|
\item Under the identification that $H = V(H) \subset K$, $(K, \pi(a))$ is a dilation of $\phi(a)$ for all $a \in A$.
|
||||||
|
\end{enumerate}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
The triple $(K, V, \pi)$ is a \textbf{Stinespring representation} of $\phi$. If $\bracsn{\pi(a)VH|a \in A}$ is dense in $K$, then $(K, V, \pi)$ is \textbf{minimal}.
|
||||||
|
\end{theorem}
|
||||||
|
\begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[Theorem 4.1]{Paulsen}}}. ]
|
||||||
|
(a): Let $A \otimes H$ and define the Hermitian form
|
||||||
|
\[
|
||||||
|
\dpn{\cdot, \cdot}{\phi}: (A \otimes H) \times (A \otimes H)\to \complex \quad \dpn{a \otimes \xi, b \otimes \eta}{\phi} = \dpn{\phi(b^*a)\xi, \eta}{H}
|
||||||
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
For each $\sum_{j = 1}^n a_j \otimes \xi_j \in A \otimes H$, let $\xi = (\xi_1, \cdots, \xi_n) \in H^n$ and
|
||||||
|
\[
|
||||||
|
a = \sum_{i, j = 1}^n E_{ij} \otimes a_{i}^* a_j = \braks{\sum_{i = 1}^n E_{1i} \otimes a_{i}}^*\braks{\sum_{j = 1}^n E_{1j} \otimes a_j} \ge 0
|
||||||
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
then since $\phi$ is completely positive,
|
||||||
|
\[
|
||||||
|
\angles{\sum_{j = 1}^n a_j \otimes \xi_j, \sum_{j = 1}^n a_j \otimes \xi_j}_\phi = \sum_{i, j = 1}^n \dpn{\phi(a_i^*a_j)\xi_j, \xi_i}{H} = \dpn{\phi_n(a)\xi, \xi}{H^n} \ge 0
|
||||||
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
and $\dpn{\cdot, \cdot}{\phi}$ is a pseudo-inner product.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Let $N = \bracsn{u \in A \otimes H| \dpn{u, u}{\phi} = 0}$. For any $u \in N$ and $v \in A \otimes H$, by the \hyperref[Cauchy-Schwarz inequality]{proposition:cauchy-schwarz},
|
||||||
|
\[
|
||||||
|
\dpn{u, v}{\phi}| \le \dpn{u, u}{\phi}^{1/2} \dpn{v, v}{\phi}^{1/2} = 0
|
||||||
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
so $N = \bracsn{u \in A \otimes H|\dpn{u, v}{\phi} = 0 \forall v \in K_0}$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
Let $K_0 = (A \otimes H)/N$ and $K$ be the completion of $K_0$ with respect to $\dpn{\cdot, \cdot}{\phi}$, then $K$ is a complex Hilbert space.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(b): Let $V: H \to K_0$ be defined by $\xi \mapsto 1_A \otimes \xi + N$, then for each $\xi \in H$,
|
||||||
|
\[
|
||||||
|
\norm{V\xi}_{K_0}^2 = \dpn{1_A \otimes \xi, 1_A \otimes \xi}{\phi} = \dpn{\phi(1_A)\xi, \xi}{H} \le \norm{\phi(1_A)}_{B(H)}\norm{\xi}_H^2
|
||||||
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
so $\norm{V}_{L(H; K)}^2 \le \norm{\phi(1_A)}_{B(H)}$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(c): For each $a \in A$, let
|
||||||
|
\[
|
||||||
|
\pi(a): K_0 \to K_0 \quad \pi(a)(b \otimes \xi + N) = (ab) \otimes \xi + N
|
||||||
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
then for any $u = \sum_{j = 1}^n b_j \otimes \xi_j \in A \otimes H$,
|
||||||
|
\begin{align*}
|
||||||
|
\norm{\pi(a)(u+N)}_{K_0}^2 &= \sum_{i, j = 1}^n \dpn{(ab_j) \otimes \xi_j, b_i \otimes \xi_i}{\phi} = \sum_{i, j = 1}^n \dpn{\phi(b_i^*a^*ab_j)\xi_j, \xi_i}{H} \\
|
||||||
|
&\le \sum_{i, j = 1}^n \norm{a^*a}_A \dpn{\phi(b_i^*b_j)\xi_j, \xi_i}{H} = \norm{a}_A^2 \cdot \norm{u + N}_{K_0}^2
|
||||||
|
\end{align*}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
so $\norm{\pi(a)}_{B(K_0)} \le \norm{a}_A$. By the \hyperref[Linear Extension Theorem]{theorem:linear-extension-theorem-normed}, $\pi(a)$ extends uniquely to an operator in $B(H)$, and $\pi: A \to B(H)$ is a bounded linear map.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
By definition, $\pi$ is a unital homomorphism of Banach algebras. Finally, for any $a \in A$ and $b \otimes \xi, c \otimes \eta \in A \otimes H$,
|
||||||
|
\begin{align*}
|
||||||
|
\dpn{\pi(a^*)(b \otimes \xi + N), c \otimes \eta + N}{K_0} &= \dpn{(a^*b) \otimes \xi, c \otimes \eta}{\phi}\\
|
||||||
|
&= \dpn{\phi(c^*a^*b)\xi, \eta}{H} = \dpn{b \otimes \xi, (ac) \otimes \eta}{\phi} \\
|
||||||
|
&= \dpn{b \otimes \xi + N, \pi(a)(c \otimes \eta + N)}{K_0}
|
||||||
|
\end{align*}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
By linearity, $\dpn{\pi(a^*)u, v}{K_0} = \dpn{u, \pi(a)v}{K_0}$ for all $u, v \in K_0$. As $K_0$ is dense in $K$, $\pi(a^*) = \pi(a)^*$, so $\pi$ is a unital *-homomorphism.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(1): For each $\xi \in H$,
|
||||||
|
\[
|
||||||
|
\norm{V\xi}_{K_0}^2 = \dpn{1_A \otimes \xi, 1_A \otimes \xi}{\phi} = \dpn{\phi(1_A)\xi, \xi}{H}
|
||||||
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
so
|
||||||
|
\[
|
||||||
|
\norm{V}_{K_0}^2 = \sup_{\substack{\xi \in H \\ \norm{\xi}_H \le 1}}\norm{V\xi}_{K_0}^2 = \sup_{\substack{\xi \in H \\ \norm{\xi}_H \le 1}}\dpn{\phi(1_A)\xi, \xi}{H} = w(\phi(1_A)) = \norm{\phi(1_A)}_{B(H)}
|
||||||
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
by \autoref{proposition:bh-numerical-radius-gymnastics}.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(2): For each $a \in A$ and $\xi, \eta \in H$,
|
||||||
|
\[
|
||||||
|
\dpn{V^*\pi(a)V\xi, \eta}{H} = \dpn{\pi(a)V\xi, V\eta}{K} = \dpn{a \otimes \xi, 1_A \otimes \eta}{\phi} = \dpn{\phi(a)\xi, \eta}{H}
|
||||||
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
so $V^*\pi(a)V = \phi(a)$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(3): If $\phi$ is unital, then for each $\xi \in H$,
|
||||||
|
\[
|
||||||
|
\dpn{V\xi, V\xi}{H} = \dpn{1_A \otimes \xi, 1_A \otimes \xi}{\phi} = \dpn{\phi(1_A)\xi, \xi}{H} = \dpn{\xi, \xi}{H}
|
||||||
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
so $V$ is an isometry.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\end{proof}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user