Added inductive limits of TVS.
This commit is contained in:
70
src/fa/tvs/inductive.tex
Normal file
70
src/fa/tvs/inductive.tex
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,70 @@
|
||||
\section{Inductive Limits}
|
||||
\label{section:tvs-inductive}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Inductive Topology]
|
||||
\label{definition:tvs-inductive}
|
||||
Let $\seqi{E}$ be TVSs over $K \in \RC$, $\seqi{T}$ such that $T_i \in \hom(E_i; E)$ for all $i \in I$, and $E$ be a vector space over $K$, then there exists a topology $\topo$ on $E$ such that:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item $(E, \topo)$ is a TVS over $K$.
|
||||
\item For each $i \in I$, $T_i \in L(E_i; E)$.
|
||||
\item[(U)] For any topology $\mathcal{S}$ on $E$ satisfying (1) and (2), $\mathcal{S} \subset T$.
|
||||
\item For any TVS $F$ and $T \in \hom(E; F)$, $T \in L(E; F)$ if and only if $T \circ T_i \in L(E_i; F)$ for all $i \in I$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
The topology $\topo$ is the \textbf{inductive topology} on $E$ induced by $\seqi{T}$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
(1): Let
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\mathcal{B} = \bracs{U \subset E|U \text{ radial, circled}, T_i^{-1}(U) \in \cn_{E_i}(0) \forall i \in I}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
To see that $\mathcal{B}$ is a fundamental system of neighbourhoods at $0$ for a vector space topology on $E$, it is sufficient to verify the following and apply \ref{proposition:tvs-0-neighbourhood-base}.
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item[(TVB1)] Every set in $\mathcal{B}$ is radial and circled by definition.
|
||||
\item[(TVB2)] For any $U \in \mathcal{B}$, $U$ is circled, so $\frac{1}{2}U + \frac{1}{2}U \subset U$. Since $\frac{1}{2}U$ is also circled and radial, $\frac{1}{2}U \in \mathcal{B}$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
Let $\topo$ be the vector space topology such that $\mathcal{B}$ is a fundamental system of neighbourhoods at $0$, then $(E, \topo)$ is a TVS.
|
||||
|
||||
(2): For each $i \in I$ and $U \in \mathcal{B}$, $T_i^{-1}(U) \in \cn_{E_i}(0)$, so $T_i \in L(E_i; E)$.
|
||||
|
||||
(U): Let $U \in \cn_{(E, \mathcal{S})}(0)$ be circled and radial, then by (2), $T_i^{-1}(U) \in \cn_{E_i}(0)$ for all $i \in I$. Thus the circled and radial neighbourhoods of $0$ in $(E, \mathcal{S})$ is a subset of $\mathcal{B}$.
|
||||
|
||||
(4): Let $U \in \cn_F(0)$ be circled and radial and $i \in I$. Since $T \circ E_i \in L(E_i; F)$, $T_i^{-1}(T^{-1}(U)) \in \cn_{E_i}(0)$, so $T^{-1}(U) \in \mathcal{B} \subset \cn_E(0)$.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Inductive Limit]
|
||||
\label{definition:tvs-inductive-limit}
|
||||
Let $(\seqi{E}, \bracsn{T^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$ be an upward-directed system of TVSs over $K \in \RC$, then there exists $(E, \bracsn{T^i_E}_{i \in I})$ such that:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item $E$ is a TVS over $K$.
|
||||
\item For each $i \in I$, $T^i_E \in L({E_i, E})$.
|
||||
\item For any $i, j \in I$ with $i \lesssim j$, the following diagram commutes:
|
||||
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\xymatrix{
|
||||
E_i \ar@{->}[rd]_{T^i_E} \ar@{->}[r]^{T^i_j} & E_j \ar@{->}[d]^{T^j_E} \\
|
||||
& E
|
||||
}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
\item[(U)] For any pair $(F, \bracsn{S^i_F}_{i \in I})$ satisfying (1) and (2), there exists a unique $S \in L({E, F})$ such that the following diagram commutes
|
||||
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\xymatrix{
|
||||
E_i \ar@{->}[d]_{T^i_E} \ar@{->}[rd]^{S^i_F} & \\
|
||||
E \ar@{->}[r]_{S} & F
|
||||
}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
for all $i \in I$.
|
||||
\item For any TVS $F$ and $T \in \hom(E; F)$, $T \in L(E; F)$ if and only if $T \circ T^i_E \in L(E_i; F)$ for all $i \in I$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
The pair $(E, \bracsn{T^i_E}_{i \in I})$ is the \textbf{inductive limit} of $(\seqi{E}, \bracsn{T^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Let $(E, \bracsn{T^i_E}_{i \in I})$ be the direct limit of $(\seqi{E}, \bracsn{T^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$ as vector spaces over $K$ (\ref{proposition:module-direct-limit}). Equip $E$ with the inductive topology (\ref{definition:tvs-inductive}) induced by $\bracsn{T^i_E}_{i \in I}$, then $(E, \bracsn{T^i_E}_{i \in I})$ satisfies (1), (2), and (3).
|
||||
|
||||
(U): By (U) of \ref{proposition:module-direct-limit}, there exists a unique $S \in \hom(E; F)$ such that the given diagram commutes. By (4) of \ref{definition:tvs-inductive}, $S \in L(E; F)$.
|
||||
|
||||
(5): By (5) of \ref{definition:tvs-inductive}.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user