This commit is contained in:
@@ -2,3 +2,4 @@
|
||||
\label{chap:order-structure}
|
||||
|
||||
\input{./lattice.tex}
|
||||
\input{./norm.tex}
|
||||
@@ -214,6 +214,10 @@
|
||||
\item $E^b = E^+$.
|
||||
\item The order bound dual $E^b$ equipped with its canonical ordering is a vector lattice.
|
||||
\item $E^b$ is order complete.
|
||||
\item For any $\phi \in E^b$ and $x \in E$ with $x \ge 0$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
|\phi|(x) = \sup\bracs{\phi(y)|y \in E, |y| \le x}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
@@ -265,6 +269,28 @@
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
is a positive linear functional on $E$. By definition $\Phi \ge f$ for all $f \in A$. If $\psi \in \hom(E; \real)$ is a linear functional such that $\psi \ge f$ for all $f \in A$, then for any $x \in C$, $\psi(x) \ge \sup_{f \in A}f(x)$. Therefore $\Phi = \sup(A)$, and $E^b$ is order complete.
|
||||
|
||||
(3): Let $\phi \in E^b$ and $x \in E$ with $x \ge 0$, then by (1),
|
||||
\begin{align*}
|
||||
|\phi|(x) &= \sup(\phi([0, x])) + \sup(-\phi([0, x])) \\
|
||||
&= \sup\bracs{\phi(u) - \phi(v)| u, v \in [0, x]}
|
||||
\end{align*}
|
||||
|
||||
For any $u, v \in [0, x]$, $|u - v| \le x$, so
|
||||
\[
|
||||
|\phi|(x) \le \sup\bracs{\phi(y)|y \in E, |y| \le x}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
On the other hand, for any $y \in E$ with $|y| \le x$, $y^+, y^- \le x$, so
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\phi(y) = \phi(y^+) - \phi(y^-) \le \sup\bracs{\phi(u) - \phi(v)| u, v \in [0, x]} = |\phi|(x)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
Therefore
|
||||
\[
|
||||
|\phi|(x) = \sup\bracs{\phi(y)|y \in E, |y| \le x}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
84
src/fa/order/norm.tex
Normal file
84
src/fa/order/norm.tex
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,84 @@
|
||||
\section{Banach Lattices}
|
||||
\label{section:banach-lattice}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Banach Lattice]
|
||||
\label{definition:banach-lattice}
|
||||
Let $(E, \normn{\cdot}_E)$ be a Banach space over $\real$ and $\le$ be a partial order on $E$, then $(E, \normn{\cdot}_E, \le)$ is a \textbf{Banach lattice} if for any $x, y \in E$, $|x| \le |y|$ implies that $\normn{x}_E \le \normn{x}_E$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:banach-lattice-properties}
|
||||
Let $(E, \normn{\cdot}_E, \le)$ be a Banach lattice, then:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item For any $x \in E$, $\normn{\ |x|\ }_E = \normn{x}_E$.
|
||||
\item For any $x \in E$, $\normn{x^+}_E, \normn{x^-}_E \le \normn{x}_E$.
|
||||
\item For any $x \in E$ and positive linear functional $\phi \in E^*$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\norm{\phi}_{E^*} = \sup\bracsn{\dpn{x, \phi}{E}|x \in E, x \ge 0, \norm{x}_E = 1}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
% More to be added.
|
||||
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
(1): Let $x \in E$, then $|\ |x|\ | = |x|$, so $\normn{\ |x|\ }_E = \normn{x}_E$.
|
||||
|
||||
(2): Let $x \in E$, then $|x| = x^+ + x^-$, so
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\normn{x}_E = \normn{x^+ + x^-}_E \ge \normn{x^+}_E, \normn{x^-}_E
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
(3): Since $|x| = x \vee (-x)$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\norm{\phi}_{E^*} = \sup_{\substack{x \in E \\ \norm{x}_E = 1}}\dpn{x, \phi}{E} \le \sup_{\substack{x \in E \\ \norm{x}_E = 1}}\dpn{|x|, \phi}{E} \le \sup_{\substack{x \in E \\ x \ge 0 \\ \norm{x}_E = 1}}\dpn{x, \phi}{E} \le \norm{\phi}_{E^*}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:banach-lattice-dual}
|
||||
Let $(E, \normn{\cdot}_E, \le)$ be a Banach lattice and $(E^*, \normn{\cdot}_{E^*}, \le)$ be its dual, equipped with the canonical ordering, then $E^*$ is a Banach lattice.
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Let $x, y \in E$ and $z \in [x, y]$, then
|
||||
\[
|
||||
|z| = z \vee (-z) \le y \vee (-x)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
so $[x, y]$ is bounded by $\norm{x}_E \vee \norm{y}_E$. Thus $E^* \subset E^b$.
|
||||
|
||||
Let $\phi \in E^*$, then by \autoref{proposition:order-vector-dual}, $0 \vee \phi$ exists in $E^b$. For any $x \in E$ with $x \ge 0$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
(0 \vee \phi)(x) = \sup(\phi([0, x])) \le \norm{\phi}_{E^*} \cdot \norm{x}_E
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
so for arbitrary $x \in E$,
|
||||
\begin{align*}
|
||||
(0 \vee \phi)(x) &= (0 \vee \phi)(x^+) - (0 \vee \phi)(x^-) \\
|
||||
&\le \norm{\phi}_{E^*}(\normn{x^+}_E \vee \normn{x^-}_E) \le \norm{\phi}_{E^*} \cdot \norm{x}_E
|
||||
\end{align*}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
and $\norm{0 \vee \phi}_{E^*} \le \norm{\phi}_{E^*}$. Therefore $E^*$ is a vector lattice.
|
||||
|
||||
Now, let $x \in E$ with $\norm{x}_E = 1$, then
|
||||
\begin{align*}
|
||||
\dpn{x, \phi}{E^*} &= \dpn{x, \phi^+}{E} + \dpn{-x, \phi^-}{E} \\
|
||||
&\le \dpn{|x|, \phi^+}{E} + \dpn{|x|, \phi^-}{E} \\
|
||||
&= \dpn{|x|, \phi^+ + \phi^-}{E} \le \norm{\ |\phi|\ }_{E^*}
|
||||
\end{align*}
|
||||
|
||||
On the other hand, by \autoref{proposition:order-vector-dual}, for any $x \in E$ with $x \ge 0$ and $\norm{x}_E = 1$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\dpn{x, |\phi|}{E^*} = \sup\bracsn{\dpn{y, \phi}{E}|y \in E, |y| \le x} \le \norm{\phi}_{E^*}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
so $\norm{\ |\phi|\ }_{E^*} \le \norm{\phi}_{E^*}$. Therefore for any $\phi, \psi \in E$ with $|\phi| \le |\psi|$,
|
||||
\begin{align*}
|
||||
\norm{\phi}_{E^*} &= \norm{\ |\phi|\ }_{E^*} = \sup\bracsn{\dpn{x, |\phi|}{E}|x \in E, x \ge 0, \norm{x}_E = 1} \\
|
||||
&\le \sup\bracsn{\dpn{x, |\psi|}{E}|x \in E, x \ge 0, \norm{x}_E = 1} \\
|
||||
&= \norm{\ |\psi|\ }_{E^*} \norm{\psi}_E
|
||||
\end{align*}
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user