Fixed some typos.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
\]
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\item[(U)] For any pair $(B, \bracsn{g^i_A}_{i \in I})$ satisfying (1) and (2), there exists a unique $g \in \mor{A, B}$ such that the following diagram commutes
|
\item[(U)] For any pair $(B, \bracsn{g^i_B}_{i \in I})$ satisfying (1) and (2), there exists a unique $g \in \mor{A, B}$ such that the following diagram commutes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\[
|
\[
|
||||||
\xymatrix{
|
\xymatrix{
|
||||||
@@ -128,12 +128,12 @@ Let $\catc$ be a category and $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim
|
|||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
\]
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\item[(U)] For any pair $(B, \bracsn{g^A_i}_{i \in I})$, there exists a unique $g \in \mor{B, A}$ such that the following diagram commutes
|
\item[(U)] For any pair $(B, \bracsn{g^B_i}_{i \in I})$, there exists a unique $g \in \mor{B, A}$ such that the following diagram commutes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\[
|
\[
|
||||||
\xymatrix{
|
\xymatrix{
|
||||||
& A_i \\
|
& A_i \\
|
||||||
B \ar@{->}[r]_{g} \ar@{->}[ru]^{g^B_i} & A \ar@{->}[u]_{f^A_i}
|
B \ar@{->}[r]_{S} \ar@{->}[ru]^{g^B_i} & A \ar@{->}[u]_{f^A_i}
|
||||||
}
|
}
|
||||||
\]
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
@@ -141,6 +141,61 @@ Let $\catc$ be a category and $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim
|
|||||||
\end{enumerate}
|
\end{enumerate}
|
||||||
\end{definition}
|
\end{definition}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\begin{proposition}
|
||||||
|
\label{proposition:direct-limit}
|
||||||
|
Let $R$ be a ring and $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{T^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$ be an upward-directed system of $R$-modules, then there exists $(A, \bracsn{T^i_A}_{i \in I})$ such that:
|
||||||
|
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||||
|
\item For each $i \in I$, $T^i_A \in \hom({A_i, A})$.
|
||||||
|
\item For any $i, j \in I$ with $i \lesssim j$, the following diagram commutes:
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\[
|
||||||
|
\xymatrix{
|
||||||
|
A_i \ar@{->}[rd]_{T^i_A} \ar@{->}[r]^{T^i_j} & A_j \ar@{->}[d]^{T^j_A} \\
|
||||||
|
& A
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\item[(U)] For any pair $(B, \bracsn{S^i_B}_{i \in I})$ satisfying (1) and (2), there exists a unique $S \in \hom({A, B})$ such that the following diagram commutes
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
\[
|
||||||
|
\xymatrix{
|
||||||
|
A_i \ar@{->}[d]_{T^i_A} \ar@{->}[rd]^{S^i_B} & \\
|
||||||
|
A \ar@{->}[r]_{g} & B
|
||||||
|
}
|
||||||
|
\]
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
for all $i \in I$.
|
||||||
|
\end{enumerate}
|
||||||
|
\end{proposition}
|
||||||
|
\begin{proof}
|
||||||
|
Let $M = \bigoplus_{i \in I}A_i$. For any $i, j \in I$ with $i \lesssim j$ and $x \in A_i$, let $x_{i, j} \in M$ such that for any $k \in I$,
|
||||||
|
\[
|
||||||
|
\pi_k(x_{i, j}) = \begin{cases}
|
||||||
|
x &k = i \\
|
||||||
|
T^i_j x &k = j \\
|
||||||
|
0 &k \ne i, j
|
||||||
|
\end{cases}
|
||||||
|
\]
|
||||||
|
Let $N \subset M$ be the submodule generated by $\bracs{x_{i, j}|i, j \in I, i \lesssim j, x \in A_i}$, $A = M/N$, and $\pi: M \to M/N$ be the canonical map.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(1): For each $i \in I$, let
|
||||||
|
\[
|
||||||
|
T^i_M: A_i \to M \quad \pi_k T^i_M x = \begin{cases}
|
||||||
|
x &k = i \\
|
||||||
|
0 &k \ne i
|
||||||
|
\end{cases}
|
||||||
|
\]
|
||||||
|
and $T^i_A = \pi \circ T^i_M$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(2): Let $i, j \in I$ with $i \lesssim j$, then for any $x \in A_i$, $T^i_Mx - T^j_M T^i_j x \in N$. Hence $T^i_Ax = T^j_A T^i_jx$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
|
(U): Let
|
||||||
|
\[
|
||||||
|
S_0: M \to B \quad x \mapsto \sum_{i \in I}S^i_B \pi_i x
|
||||||
|
\]
|
||||||
|
then $S_0$ is the unique linear map such that $S_0 \circ T^i_M = S^i_B$ for all $i \in I$. For any $i, j \in I$ with $i \lesssim J$, $S^i_B x = S^j_B T^i_j x$, so $\ker S_0 \supset N$. By the first isomorphism theorem, there exists a unique $S \in \hom(A; B)$ such that $S_0 = S \circ \pi$.
|
||||||
|
\end{proof}
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
\begin{proposition}
|
\begin{proposition}
|
||||||
\label{proposition:module-inverse-limit}
|
\label{proposition:module-inverse-limit}
|
||||||
Let $R$ be a ring and $(\seqi{A}, \bracs{T^i_j|i, j \in I, i \lesssim j)}$ be a downward-directed system of $R$-modules, then there exists $(A, \bracsn{T^A_i}_{i \in I})$ such that:
|
Let $R$ be a ring and $(\seqi{A}, \bracs{T^i_j|i, j \in I, i \lesssim j)}$ be a downward-directed system of $R$-modules, then there exists $(A, \bracsn{T^A_i}_{i \in I})$ such that:
|
||||||
@@ -170,7 +225,7 @@ Let $\catc$ be a category and $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim
|
|||||||
\[
|
\[
|
||||||
A = \bracs{x \in \prod_{i \in I}A_i \bigg | \pi_j(x) = T^i_j\pi_i(x) \forall i, j \in I, i \lesssim j}
|
A = \bracs{x \in \prod_{i \in I}A_i \bigg | \pi_j(x) = T^i_j\pi_i(x) \forall i, j \in I, i \lesssim j}
|
||||||
\]
|
\]
|
||||||
For each $i \in I$, let $T^A_i = \pi_i$, then $(A, (A, \bracsn{T^A_i}_{i \in I})$ satisfies (1) and (2) by definition of $A$.
|
For each $i \in I$, let $T^A_i = \pi_i$, then $(A, \bracsn{T^A_i}_{i \in I})$ satisfies (1) and (2) by definition of $A$.
|
||||||
|
|
||||||
(U): Let $(B, \bracsn{S^B_i}_{i \in I})$ satisfying (1) and (2). Let
|
(U): Let $(B, \bracsn{S^B_i}_{i \in I})$ satisfying (1) and (2). Let
|
||||||
\[
|
\[
|
||||||
|
|||||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user