Added projective limits.

This commit is contained in:
Bokuan Li
2026-01-28 13:39:00 -05:00
parent e7f7dfc8e3
commit b220d792e4
4 changed files with 88 additions and 6 deletions

View File

@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
\begin{definition}[Direct Limit] \begin{definition}[Direct Limit]
\label{definition:direct-limit} \label{definition:direct-limit}
Let $\catc$ be a category and $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$ be an upward-directed system, then a \textbf{direct limit} of $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$ is a pair $(A, \bracsn{f^i_A}_{i \in I})$ such that: Let $\catc$ be a category and $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$ be an upward-directed system, then a \textbf{direct limit} of $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$, denoted $\lim_{\longrightarrow}A_i$, is a pair $(A, \bracsn{f^i_A}_{i \in I})$ such that:
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item For each $i \in I$, $f^i_A \in \mor{A_i, A}$. \item For each $i \in I$, $f^i_A \in \mor{A_i, A}$.
\item For any $i, j \in I$ with $i \lesssim j$, the following diagram commutes: \item For any $i, j \in I$ with $i \lesssim j$, the following diagram commutes:
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
} }
\] \]
\item[(U)] For any pair $(B, \bracsn{g^i_A}_{i \in I})$ satsifying (1) and (2), there exists a unique $g \in \mor{A, B}$ such that the following diagram commutes \item[(U)] For any pair $(B, \bracsn{g^i_A}_{i \in I})$ satisfying (1) and (2), there exists a unique $g \in \mor{A, B}$ such that the following diagram commutes
\[ \[
\xymatrix{ \xymatrix{
@@ -112,12 +112,11 @@
for all $i \in I$. for all $i \in I$.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
\end{definition} \end{definition}
\begin{definition}[Inverse Limit] \begin{definition}[Inverse Limit]
\label{definition:inverse-limit} \label{definition:inverse-limit}
Let $\catc$ be a category and $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$ be an upward-directed system, then an \textbf{inverse limit} of $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$ is a pair $(A, \bracsn{f^A_i}_{i \in I})$ such that: Let $\catc$ be a category and $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$ be an downward-directed system, then an \textbf{inverse limit} of $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$, denoted $\lim_{\longleftarrow}A_i$, is a pair $(A, \bracsn{f^A_i}_{i \in I})$ such that:
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item For each $i \in I$, $f^A_i \in \mor{A, A_i}$. \item For each $i \in I$, $f^A_i \in \mor{A, A_i}$.
\item For any $i, j \in I$ with $i \lesssim j$, the following diagram commutes: \item For any $i, j \in I$ with $i \lesssim j$, the following diagram commutes:
@@ -141,3 +140,45 @@ Let $\catc$ be a category and $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim
for all $i \in I$. for all $i \in I$.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
\end{definition} \end{definition}
\begin{proposition}
\label{proposition:module-inverse-limit}
Let $R$ be a ring and $(\seqi{A}, \bracs{T^i_j|i, j \in I, i \lesssim j)}$ be a downward-directed system of $R$-modules, then there exists $(A, \bracsn{T^A_i}_{i \in I})$ such that:
\begin{enumerate}
\item For each $i \in I$, $T^A_i \in \hom(A; A_i)$.
\item For any $i, j \in I$ with $i \lesssim j$, the following diagram commutes:
\[
\xymatrix{
A_i \ar@{->}[r]^{T^i_j} & A_j \\
A \ar@{->}[u]^{T^A_i} \ar@{->}[ru]_{T^A_j} &
}
\]
\item[(U)] For any pair $(B, \bracsn{S^B_i}_{i \in I})$ satisfying (1) and (2), there exists a unique $S \in \hom(B; A)$ such that the following diagram commutes
\[
\xymatrix{
& A_i \\
B \ar@{->}[r]_{S} \ar@{->}[ru]^{S^B_i} & A \ar@{->}[u]_{T^A_i}
}
\]
for all $i \in I$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Let
\[
A = \bracs{x \in \prod_{i \in I}A_i \bigg | \pi_j(x) = T^i_j\pi_i(x) \forall i, j \in I, i \lesssim j}
\]
For each $i \in I$, let $T^A_i = \pi_i$, then $(A, (A, \bracsn{T^A_i}_{i \in I})$ satisfies (1) and (2) by definition of $A$.
(U): Let $(B, \bracsn{S^B_i}_{i \in I})$ satisfying (1) and (2). Let
\[
S: B \to \prod_{i \in I}A_i \quad \pi_i(Sx) = S^B_i
\]
then for any $x \in B$ and $i, j \in I$ with $i \lesssim j$,
\[
\pi_j (Sx) = S^B_jx = T^i_j S^B_ix = T^i_j \pi_i(S x)
\]
so $S \in \hom(B; A)$, and the diagram commutes. Since any map $f: B \to A$ is uniquely determined by its composition with the projections, $S$ is unique.
\end{proof}

View File

@@ -6,8 +6,8 @@
\label{definition:continuous-linear} \label{definition:continuous-linear}
Let $E, F$ be TVSs over $K \in \RC$, and $T \in \hom({E, F})$ be a linear map, then the following are equivalent: Let $E, F$ be TVSs over $K \in \RC$, and $T \in \hom({E, F})$ be a linear map, then the following are equivalent:
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item $T$ is uniformly continuous. \item $T \in UC(E; F)$.
\item $T$ is continuous. \item $T \in C(E; F)$.
\item $T$ is continuous at $0$. \item $T$ is continuous at $0$.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
If the above holds, then $T$ is a \textbf{continuous linear map}. The set $L(E; F)$ denotes the vector space of all continuous linear maps from $E$ to $F$. If the above holds, then $T$ is a \textbf{continuous linear map}. The set $L(E; F)$ denotes the vector space of all continuous linear maps from $E$ to $F$.
@@ -46,6 +46,7 @@
\begin{enumerate} \begin{enumerate}
\item[(3)] $\fU$ is translation-invariant. \item[(3)] $\fU$ is translation-invariant.
\item[(4)] $E$ equipped with the topology induced by $\fU$ is a topological vector space. \item[(4)] $E$ equipped with the topology induced by $\fU$ is a topological vector space.
\item[(5)] For any TVS $F$ over $K$ and linear map $T \in \hom(F; E)$, $T \in L(F; E)$ if and only if $T_i \circ T \in L(F; F_i)$ for all $i \in I$.
\end{enumerate} \end{enumerate}
The uniformity and its induced topology are the \textbf{initial uniformity/topology} induced by $\seqi{T}$. The uniformity and its induced topology are the \textbf{initial uniformity/topology} induced by $\seqi{T}$.
\end{definition} \end{definition}
@@ -66,6 +67,8 @@
(4): By (TVS1) and (TVS2), for each $j \in J$, there exists an entourage $V_j$ of $F_j$ and $\eps_j > 0$ such that for any $(x, x'), (y, y') \in V_j$ and $\lambda, \lambda' \in K$ with $\abs{\lambda - \lambda'} < \eps_j$, $(x + y, x' + y'), (\lambda x, \lambda' x') \in U_j$. (4): By (TVS1) and (TVS2), for each $j \in J$, there exists an entourage $V_j$ of $F_j$ and $\eps_j > 0$ such that for any $(x, x'), (y, y') \in V_j$ and $\lambda, \lambda' \in K$ with $\abs{\lambda - \lambda'} < \eps_j$, $(x + y, x' + y'), (\lambda x, \lambda' x') \in U_j$.
Therefore, for any $(x, x'), (y, y') \in \bigcap_{j \in J} T_j^{-1}(V_j)$ and $\lambda, \lambda' \in K$ with $\abs{\lambda - \lambda'} < \min_{j \in J}\eps$, $(x + y, x' + y'), (\lambda x, \lambda' x') \in V$. Therefore, for any $(x, x'), (y, y') \in \bigcap_{j \in J} T_j^{-1}(V_j)$ and $\lambda, \lambda' \in K$ with $\abs{\lambda - \lambda'} < \min_{j \in J}\eps$, $(x + y, x' + y'), (\lambda x, \lambda' x') \in V$.
(5): By \ref{definition:continuous-linear} and (4) of \ref{definition:initial-uniformity}.
\end{proof} \end{proof}
\begin{definition}[Product Topology] \begin{definition}[Product Topology]

View File

@@ -8,4 +8,5 @@
\input{./src/fa/tvs/continuous.tex} \input{./src/fa/tvs/continuous.tex}
\input{./src/fa/tvs/quotient.tex} \input{./src/fa/tvs/quotient.tex}
\input{./src/fa/tvs/completion.tex} \input{./src/fa/tvs/completion.tex}
\input{./src/fa/tvs/projective.tex}
\input{./src/fa/tvs/spaces-of-linear.tex} \input{./src/fa/tvs/spaces-of-linear.tex}

37
src/fa/tvs/projective.tex Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,37 @@
\section{Projective Limits}
\label{section:tvs-projective-limit}
\begin{definition}[Projective Limit of Topological Vector Spaces]
\label{definition:tvs-projective-limit}
Let $(\seqi{E}, \bracsn{T^i_j|i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$ be a downward-directed system of topological vector spaces over $K \in \RC$, then there exists $(E, \bracsn{T^E_i}_{i \in I})$ such that:
\begin{enumerate}
\item For each $i \in I$, $T^E_i \in L(E; E_i)$.
\item For any $i, j \in I$ with $i \lesssim j$, the following diagram commutes:
\[
\xymatrix{
E_i \ar@{->}[r]^{T^i_j} & E_j \\
E \ar@{->}[u]^{T^E_i} \ar@{->}[ru]_{T^E_j} &
}
\]
\item[(U)] For any pair $(F, \bracsn{S^F_i}_{i \in I})$ satisfying (1) and (2), there exists a unique $S \in L(F; E)$ such that the following diagram commutes
\[
\xymatrix{
& E_i \\
F \ar@{->}[r]_{S} \ar@{->}[ru]^{S^F_i} & A \ar@{->}[u]_{T^E_i}
}
\]
for all $i \in I$.
\item For any TVS $F$ over $K$ and $S \in \hom(F; E)$, $S \in L(F; E)$ if and only if $T^E_i \circ F \in L(F; E_i)$ for all $i \in I$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{definition}
\begin{proof}
Let $(E, \bracsn{T^E_i}_{i \in I})$ be the inverse limit of $(\seqi{E}, \bracs{T^i_j|i, j \in I, i \lessim j})$ as $K$-vector spaces (\ref{proposition:module-inverse-limit}).
Equip $E$ with the initial topology generated by $\bracsn{T^E_i}_{i \in I}$, then $(E, \bracsn{T^E_i}_{i \in I})$ satisfies (1) and (2).
(4): By (5) of \ref{definition:initial-topology}.
(U): By (U) of \ref{proposition:module-inverse-limit}, there exists a unique $S \in \hom(F; E)$ such that the given diagram commutes. By (4), $S \in L(F; E)$.
\end{proof}