Added projective limits.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Direct Limit]
|
||||
\label{definition:direct-limit}
|
||||
Let $\catc$ be a category and $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$ be an upward-directed system, then a \textbf{direct limit} of $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$ is a pair $(A, \bracsn{f^i_A}_{i \in I})$ such that:
|
||||
Let $\catc$ be a category and $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$ be an upward-directed system, then a \textbf{direct limit} of $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$, denoted $\lim_{\longrightarrow}A_i$, is a pair $(A, \bracsn{f^i_A}_{i \in I})$ such that:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item For each $i \in I$, $f^i_A \in \mor{A_i, A}$.
|
||||
\item For any $i, j \in I$ with $i \lesssim j$, the following diagram commutes:
|
||||
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
|
||||
}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
\item[(U)] For any pair $(B, \bracsn{g^i_A}_{i \in I})$ satsifying (1) and (2), there exists a unique $g \in \mor{A, B}$ such that the following diagram commutes
|
||||
\item[(U)] For any pair $(B, \bracsn{g^i_A}_{i \in I})$ satisfying (1) and (2), there exists a unique $g \in \mor{A, B}$ such that the following diagram commutes
|
||||
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\xymatrix{
|
||||
@@ -112,12 +112,11 @@
|
||||
|
||||
for all $i \in I$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Inverse Limit]
|
||||
\label{definition:inverse-limit}
|
||||
Let $\catc$ be a category and $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$ be an upward-directed system, then an \textbf{inverse limit} of $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$ is a pair $(A, \bracsn{f^A_i}_{i \in I})$ such that:
|
||||
Let $\catc$ be a category and $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$ be an downward-directed system, then an \textbf{inverse limit} of $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim j})$, denoted $\lim_{\longleftarrow}A_i$, is a pair $(A, \bracsn{f^A_i}_{i \in I})$ such that:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item For each $i \in I$, $f^A_i \in \mor{A, A_i}$.
|
||||
\item For any $i, j \in I$ with $i \lesssim j$, the following diagram commutes:
|
||||
@@ -141,3 +140,45 @@ Let $\catc$ be a category and $(\seqi{A}, \bracsn{f^i_j| i, j \in I, i \lesssim
|
||||
for all $i \in I$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:module-inverse-limit}
|
||||
Let $R$ be a ring and $(\seqi{A}, \bracs{T^i_j|i, j \in I, i \lesssim j)}$ be a downward-directed system of $R$-modules, then there exists $(A, \bracsn{T^A_i}_{i \in I})$ such that:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item For each $i \in I$, $T^A_i \in \hom(A; A_i)$.
|
||||
\item For any $i, j \in I$ with $i \lesssim j$, the following diagram commutes:
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\xymatrix{
|
||||
A_i \ar@{->}[r]^{T^i_j} & A_j \\
|
||||
A \ar@{->}[u]^{T^A_i} \ar@{->}[ru]_{T^A_j} &
|
||||
}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\item[(U)] For any pair $(B, \bracsn{S^B_i}_{i \in I})$ satisfying (1) and (2), there exists a unique $S \in \hom(B; A)$ such that the following diagram commutes
|
||||
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\xymatrix{
|
||||
& A_i \\
|
||||
B \ar@{->}[r]_{S} \ar@{->}[ru]^{S^B_i} & A \ar@{->}[u]_{T^A_i}
|
||||
}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
for all $i \in I$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Let
|
||||
\[
|
||||
A = \bracs{x \in \prod_{i \in I}A_i \bigg | \pi_j(x) = T^i_j\pi_i(x) \forall i, j \in I, i \lesssim j}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
For each $i \in I$, let $T^A_i = \pi_i$, then $(A, (A, \bracsn{T^A_i}_{i \in I})$ satisfies (1) and (2) by definition of $A$.
|
||||
|
||||
(U): Let $(B, \bracsn{S^B_i}_{i \in I})$ satisfying (1) and (2). Let
|
||||
\[
|
||||
S: B \to \prod_{i \in I}A_i \quad \pi_i(Sx) = S^B_i
|
||||
\]
|
||||
then for any $x \in B$ and $i, j \in I$ with $i \lesssim j$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\pi_j (Sx) = S^B_jx = T^i_j S^B_ix = T^i_j \pi_i(S x)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
so $S \in \hom(B; A)$, and the diagram commutes. Since any map $f: B \to A$ is uniquely determined by its composition with the projections, $S$ is unique.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user