Class is over.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -1,4 +1,4 @@
|
||||
\section{$G \curvearrowright \beta G$}
|
||||
\section{The Universal Flow}
|
||||
\label{section:stone-cech-flow}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Greatest Ambit]
|
||||
@@ -52,3 +52,97 @@
|
||||
for all $g \in G$. Finally, since $\beta G$ is compact and $X$ is Hausdorff, $\pi(\beta G)$ is \hyperref[also compact]{proposition:compact-extensions} and \hyperref[hence closed]{proposition:compact-closed}. As $(X, x_0)$ is an ambit and $\pi(\beta G) \supset Gx_0$, $\pi(\beta G) \supset \ol{Gx_0} = X$.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}
|
||||
\label{definition:stone-cech-semigroup}
|
||||
Let $G$ be a discrete group. For each $\fU, \fV \in \beta G$, let $\fU \cdot \fV = \lim_{g \to \fU}g\fV$, then
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item For each $A \subset G$, $A \in \fU \cdot \fV$ if and only if $\bracsn{g \in G|g^{-1}A \in \fV} \in \fU$.
|
||||
\item $\beta G$ equipped with the composition law $(\fU, \fV) \mapsto \fU \cdot \fV$ is a semigroup with identity $1_G$.
|
||||
\item (\textbf{Right Topological}) For each $\fV \in \beta G$, the mapping $\beta G \to \beta G$ defined by $\fU \mapsto \fU \cdot \fV$ is continuous.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
(3): By (U2) of the \hyperref[Stone-Čech compactification]{definition:stone-cech}.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Induced Action]
|
||||
\label{definition:stone-cech-semigroup-induced-action}
|
||||
Let $G$ be a group, $(X, x_0)$ be a pointed $G$-flow, and $p_x: G \to X$ be the orbit map, then the mapping
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\pi: \beta G \to C(X; X) \quad \pi_\fU x = \fU x = \lim_{g \to \fU}gx
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
is a semigroup action of $\beta G$ on $X$, known as the \textbf{induced action} of $\beta G$ on $X$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:tds-return-set-stone-cech}
|
||||
Let $G \curvearrowright X$ be a $G$-flow and $x \in X$. For each $y \in X$ and $\fU \in \beta G$, then $y = \fU x$ if and only if $N(x, U) \in \fU$.
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
By definition of filter limits, $y = \fU x$ if and only if $p_x^{-1}(U) \in \fU$ for all $U \in \cn_X(y)$. Since $p_x^{-1}(U) = N(x, U)$, $y = \fU x$ if and only if $N(x, U) \in \fU$.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:z-stone-cech-fixed-point}
|
||||
Let $G \curvearrowright X$ be a $G$-flow and $x \in X$, then the following are equivalent:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item For each $U \in \cn_X(x)$, $N(x, U)$ is infinite.
|
||||
\item There exists $\fU \in \beta G \setminus G$ such that $px = x$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
% "obvious"
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Left Ideal]
|
||||
\label{definition:left-ideal-semigroup}
|
||||
Let $G$ be a semigroup and $\emptyset \ne I \subset G$, then $I$ is a \textbf{left ideal} if for any $g \in G$ and $h \in I$, $gh \in I$. The left ideal $I$ is \textbf{minimal} if there exists no left ideal $J \subsetneq I$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:stone-cech-ideal-subflow}
|
||||
Let $G$ be a group and $\emptyset \ne I \subset \beta G$. If $I$ is closed, then the following are equivalent:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item $L$ is a $G$-subflow of $\beta G$.
|
||||
\item $L$ is a closed left ideal of $\beta G$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
Moreover, for arbitrary $\emptyset \ne I \subset \beta G$, the following are equivalent
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}[label=(M\arabic*)]
|
||||
\item $L$ is a minimal $G$-subflow of $\beta G$.
|
||||
\item $L$ is a minimal left ideal of $\beta G$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
In particular, minimal left ideals of $\beta G$ are closed.
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{corollary}
|
||||
\label{corollary:stone-cech-minimal-ideal-existence}
|
||||
Let $G$ be a group, then $\beta G$ admits a minimal ideal.
|
||||
\end{corollary}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
By \autoref{theorem:tds-minimal-existence} and \autoref{proposition:stone-cech-ideal-subflow}.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Universal Minimal Flow]
|
||||
\label{definition:universal-minimal-flow}
|
||||
Let $G$ be a group, then there exists a flow $(M, \alpha)$ such that:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item $(M, \alpha)$ is a minimal $G$-flow.
|
||||
\item[(U)] For any minimal $G$-flow $(X, \beta)$, $x_0 \in X$, and $m_0 \in M$, there exists a unique continuous map $\Phi \in C(M; X)$ such that $\Phi(m_0) = x_0$ and the following diagram commutes
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\xymatrix{
|
||||
M \ar@{->}[r]^{\Phi} \ar@{->}[d]_{\alpha(g)} & X \ar@{->}[d]^{\beta(g)} \\
|
||||
M \ar@{->}[r]_{\Phi} & X
|
||||
}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
for all $g \in G$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user