This commit is contained in:
Bokuan Li
2026-08-20 16:25:48 -04:00
parent b3d3620ec9
commit 881f4a4746
6 changed files with 71 additions and 29 deletions

View File

@@ -31,12 +31,12 @@
\begin{definition}[Pure State]
\label{definition:pure-state}
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $\phi \in S(A)$, then $\phi$ is a \textbf{pure state} if $\phi$ is an extreme point of $S(A)$. The set $P(A)$ is the collection of all pure states of $A$.
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $\phi \in S(A)$, then $\phi$ is a \textbf{pure state} if $\phi$ is an extreme point of $S(A)$. The set $PS(A)$ is the collection of all pure states of $A$.
\end{definition}
\begin{proposition}
\label{proposition:state-space-compact-convex}
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra, then $S(A)$ is a compact convex set, and $S(A)$ is the weak*-closed convex hull of $P(A)$.
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra, then $S(A)$ is a compact convex set, and $S(A)$ is the weak*-closed convex hull of $PS(A)$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Since the evaluation map is weak* continuous and
@@ -48,15 +48,15 @@
By \autoref{theorem:cstar-positive-algebraic}, $S(A) \subset \ol{B_{A^*}(0, 1)}$, which is weak* compact by the \hyperref[Banach-Alaoglu Theorem]{theorem:alaoglu}. Therefore $S(A)$ is compact by \autoref{proposition:compact-extensions}.
By the \hyperref[Krein-Milman Theorem]{theorem:krein-milman}, $S(A)$ is the weak*-closed convex hull of $P(A)$.
By the \hyperref[Krein-Milman Theorem]{theorem:krein-milman}, $S(A)$ is the weak*-closed convex hull of $PS(A)$.
\end{proof}
\begin{proposition}
\label{proposition:multiplicative-pure-state}
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra, then:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\Omega(A) \subset P(A)$.
\item If $A$ is commutative, then $\Omega(A) = P(A)$.
\item $\Omega(A) \subset PS(A)$.
\item If $A$ is commutative, then $\Omega(A) = PS(A)$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra, $B \subset A$ be a $C^*$-subalgebra with $1_A \in B$, and $\phi \in S(B)$, then
\begin{enumerate}
\item There exists $\Phi \in S(A)$ such that $\Phi|_B = \phi$.
\item If $\phi \in P(B)$, then there exists $\Phi \in P(A)$ such that $\Phi|_B = \phi$.
\item If $\phi \in PS(B)$, then there exists $\Phi \in PS(A)$ such that $\Phi|_B = \phi$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
(2): Let $E(\phi) = \bracs{\Phi \in S(A)|\Phi|_B = \phi}$ be the collection of all extensions of $\phi$, then $E(\phi)$ is a weak*-closed convex subset of $S(A)$. By (1), $E(\phi)$ is non-empty, and as such admits an extreme point $\Phi$ by the \hyperref[Krein-Milman Theorem]{theorem:krein-milman}.
Let $\psi, \rho \in S(A)$ and $t \in (0, 1)$ such that $\Phi = (1 - t)\psi + t\rho$. In which case, $\phi = (1 - t)\psi|_B + t\rho|_B$. Since $\phi \in P(B)$, $\phi = \psi|_B = \rho|_B$, so $\psi, \rho \in E(\phi)$. As $\Phi$ is an extreme point of $E(\phi)$, $\Phi = \psi = \rho$. Therefore $\Phi \in P(A)$.
Let $\psi, \rho \in S(A)$ and $t \in (0, 1)$ such that $\Phi = (1 - t)\psi + t\rho$. In which case, $\phi = (1 - t)\psi|_B + t\rho|_B$. Since $\phi \in PS(B)$, $\phi = \psi|_B = \rho|_B$, so $\psi, \rho \in E(\phi)$. As $\Phi$ is an extreme point of $E(\phi)$, $\Phi = \psi = \rho$. Therefore $\Phi \in PS(A)$.
\end{proof}
@@ -96,15 +96,15 @@
\label{corollary:cstar-positive-property-probe}
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $x \in A$ be normal, then\footnote{The crude bound seems kind of tragic, but it wouldn't be true otherwise. }
\begin{align*}
\sigma_A(x) &\subset \bracs{\dpn{x, \phi}{A}|\phi \in P(A)} \\
\sigma_A(x) &\subset \bracs{\dpn{x, \phi}{A}|\phi \in PS(A)} \\
&\subset \bracs{\dpn{x, \phi}{A}|\phi \in S(A)} = \ol{\text{Conv}}(\sigma_A(x))
\end{align*}
In particular, there exists $\phi \in P(A)$ such that $\norm{x}_A = |\dpn{x, \phi}{A}|$.
In particular, there exists $\phi \in PS(A)$ such that $\norm{x}_A = |\dpn{x, \phi}{A}|$.
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof}
Let $\lambda \in \sigma_A(x)$. By \autoref{proposition:gelfand-transform-gymnastics}, there exists $\phi \in \Omega(A[x])$ such that $\dpn{x, \phi}{A[x]} = \lambda$. By \autoref{proposition:multiplicative-pure-state}, $\phi \in P(A[x])$. The \hyperref[pure state extension theorem]{theorem:cstar-pure-state-extension} implies that there exists $\Phi \in P(A)$ such that $\Phi|_{A[x]} = \phi$. Thus $\Phi$ is a pure state with $\dpn{x, \Phi}{A} = \lambda$, and $ \sigma_A(x) \subset \bracs{\dpn{x, \Phi}{A}|\Phi \in P(A)}$.
Let $\lambda \in \sigma_A(x)$. By \autoref{proposition:gelfand-transform-gymnastics}, there exists $\phi \in \Omega(A[x])$ such that $\dpn{x, \phi}{A[x]} = \lambda$. By \autoref{proposition:multiplicative-pure-state}, $\phi \in PS(A[x])$. The \hyperref[pure state extension theorem]{theorem:cstar-pure-state-extension} implies that there exists $\Phi \in PS(A)$ such that $\Phi|_{A[x]} = \phi$. Thus $\Phi$ is a pure state with $\dpn{x, \Phi}{A} = \lambda$, and $ \sigma_A(x) \subset \bracs{\dpn{x, \Phi}{A}|\Phi \in PS(A)}$.
Let $\Phi \in S(A)$ and $\phi = \Phi|_{A[x]}$, then $\phi \in S(A[x])$ as well. By the \hyperref[Gelfand-Naimark Theorem]{theorem:gelfand-naimark}, the \hyperref[Spectral Theorem]{theorem:spectral-c-star}, and the \hyperref[Riesz Representation Theorem]{theorem:riesz-radon}, $\phi$ takes the form of a Radon probability measure $\mu$ on $\sigma_A(x)$. In which case,
\[
@@ -113,7 +113,7 @@
Finally, since $S(A)$ is compact and convex by \autoref{proposition:state-space-compact-convex},
\begin{align*}
\bracs{\dpn{x, \phi}{A}|\phi \in S(A)} &= \ol{\text{Conv}}(\bracs{\dpn{x, \phi}{A}|\phi \in P(A)}) \\
\bracs{\dpn{x, \phi}{A}|\phi \in S(A)} &= \ol{\text{Conv}}(\bracs{\dpn{x, \phi}{A}|\phi \in PS(A)}) \\
&\subset \ol{\text{Conv}}(\sigma_A(x))
\end{align*}
@@ -139,35 +139,35 @@
\label{corollary:cstar-positive-weakstar-dense}
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra, then:
\begin{enumerate}
\item For each $x \in A$, $x = 0$ if and only if $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} = 0$ for all $\phi \in P(A)$.
\item The linear span of $P(A)$ is weak*-dense in $A^*$.
\item For each $x \in A$, $x = 0$ if and only if $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} = 0$ for all $\phi \in PS(A)$.
\item The linear span of $PS(A)$ is weak*-dense in $A^*$.
\end{enumerate}
Moreover, for any $x \in A$,
\begin{enumerate}[start=2]
\item $x$ is self-adjoint if and only if $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} \in \real$ for all $\phi \in P(A)$.
\item $x$ is positive if and only if $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} \ge 0$ for all $\phi \in P(A)$.
\item $x$ is self-adjoint if and only if $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} \in \real$ for all $\phi \in PS(A)$.
\item $x$ is positive if and only if $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} \ge 0$ for all $\phi \in PS(A)$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[Theorem 13.9]{Zhu}}}. ]
(1): Let $x \in A$ such that $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} = 0$ for all $\phi \in P(A)$. First suppose that $x$ is self-adjoint. By \autoref{theorem:cstar-state-existence}, $\sigma_A(x) = \bracs{0}$, and $\norm{x}_A = [x]_{sp} = 0$ by \autoref{theorem:c-star-normal-spectral-radius}.
(1): Let $x \in A$ such that $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} = 0$ for all $\phi \in PS(A)$. First suppose that $x$ is self-adjoint. By \autoref{theorem:cstar-state-existence}, $\sigma_A(x) = \bracs{0}$, and $\norm{x}_A = [x]_{sp} = 0$ by \autoref{theorem:c-star-normal-spectral-radius}.
Now suppose that $x$ is arbitrary. In this case, for each $\phi \in P(A)$,
Now suppose that $x$ is arbitrary. In this case, for each $\phi \in PS(A)$,
\[
0 = \text{Re}(\dpn{x, \phi}{A}) = \dpn{\text{Re}(x), \phi}{A}
\]
because $\phi$ is Hermitian. Similarly, $\dpn{\text{Im}(x), \phi}{A} = 0$ as well. Thus $\text{Re}(x) = \text{Im}(x) = 0$, and $x = 0$ as well.
(2): Since the linear span of $P(A)$ separates points in $A$, it is weak*-dense in $A^*$ by \autoref{lemma:duality-dense}.
(2): Since the linear span of $PS(A)$ separates points in $A$, it is weak*-dense in $A^*$ by \autoref{lemma:duality-dense}.
(3): Let $\phi \in P(A)$, then $\phi$ is Hermitian. If $x$ is self-adjoint, then $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} \in \real$.
(3): Let $\phi \in PS(A)$, then $\phi$ is Hermitian. If $x$ is self-adjoint, then $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} \in \real$.
On the other hand, if $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} \in \real$, then $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} = \dpn{x^*, \phi}{A}$, and $\dpn{x - x^*, \phi}{A} =0 $. If this holds for all $\phi \in P(A)$, then $x - x^* = 0$ by (1), and $x$ is self-adjoint.
On the other hand, if $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} \in \real$, then $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} = \dpn{x^*, \phi}{A}$, and $\dpn{x - x^*, \phi}{A} =0 $. If this holds for all $\phi \in PS(A)$, then $x - x^* = 0$ by (1), and $x$ is self-adjoint.
(4): Let $\phi \in P(A)$, then $\phi$ is positive. Thus if $x$ is positive, $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} \ge 0$.
(4): Let $\phi \in PS(A)$, then $\phi$ is positive. Thus if $x$ is positive, $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} \ge 0$.
On the other hand, if $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} \ge 0$ for all $\phi \in P(A)$, then $x$ is self-adjoint by (3). By \autoref{corollary:cstar-positive-property-probe}, $\sigma_A(x) \subset [0, \infty)$. As such, $x$ is positive by \autoref{corollary:spectrum-characterisation-iff}.
On the other hand, if $\dpn{x, \phi}{A} \ge 0$ for all $\phi \in PS(A)$, then $x$ is self-adjoint by (3). By \autoref{corollary:cstar-positive-property-probe}, $\sigma_A(x) \subset [0, \infty)$. As such, $x$ is positive by \autoref{corollary:spectrum-characterisation-iff}.
\end{proof}