Added some spectrum gruntwork.

This commit is contained in:
Bokuan Li
2026-06-30 16:12:33 -04:00
parent e19a5e3ad0
commit 60544ea6a0
4 changed files with 143 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
Let $x \in A$. By \autoref{proposition:spectrum-non-empty}, there exists $\lambda \in \sigma_A(x)$. Since $\lambda \cdot 1 - x$ is not invertible and every non-zero element of $A$ is invertible, $x = \lambda \cdot 1$. Therefore the mapping $\complex \to A$ defined by $\lambda \mapsto \lambda \cdot 1$ is an isometric isomorphism.
\end{proof}
\begin{proposition}[Spectral Radius Formula]
\begin{proposition}[Beurling's Spectral Radius Formula]
\label{proposition:spectral-radius-hadamard}
Let $A$ be a unital Banach algebra and $x \in A$, then $[\cdot]_{sp} = \limsup_{n \to \infty}\normn{x^n}_A^{1/n}$.
\end{proposition}
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@
\begin{proposition}
\label{proposition:commutative-spectrum-gymnastics}
Let $A$ be a unital Banach algebra and $x, y \in A$ with $x = y$, then
Let $A$ be a commutative unital Banach algebra and $x, y \in A$ with $x = y$, then
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\sigma_A(x + y) \subset \sigma_A(x) + \sigma_A(y)$.
\item $\sigma_A(xy) \subset \sigma_A(x)\sigma_A(y)$.

View File

@@ -2,5 +2,6 @@
\label{chap:c-star-algebras}
\input{./involution.tex}
\input{./unitary.tex}
\input{./sa.tex}
\input{./order.tex}

View File

@@ -31,6 +31,91 @@
If the above holds, then $x$ is \textbf{normal}.
\end{definition}
\begin{theorem}
\label{theorem:c-star-normal-spectral-radius}
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $x \in A$ be normal, then $\norm{x}_A = [x]_{sp}$.
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[Theorem II.8.1]{Zhu}}}. ]
First suppose that $x$ is self-adjoint. In this case,
\begin{align*}
\normn{x^2}_A &= \normn{xx^*}_A = \norm{x}_A^2 \\
\normn{x^{2^n}}_A &= \norm{x}_A^{2^n}
\end{align*}
for all $n \in \natp$. Thus by the \hyperref[spectral radius formula]{proposition:spectral-radius-hadamard},
\[
[x]_{sp} = \limsup_{n \to \infty}\norm{x^{n}}_A^{1/n} \ge \limsup_{n \to \infty}\normn{x^{2^n}}_A^{1/2^n} = \norm{x}_A
\]
Now suppose that $x$ is only normal. Since $x$ and $x^*$ commute, $[xx^*]_{sp} \le [x]_{sp}[x^*]_{sp}$ by \autoref{proposition:commutative-spectrum-gymnastics}. Thus
\[
\norm{x}^2_A = \normn{xx^*}_A = [xx^*]_{sp} \le [x]_{sp}[x^*]_{sp} = [x]_{sp}^2
\]
by (5) of \autoref{proposition:c-star-algebra-gymnastics}.
\end{proof}
\begin{corollary}
\label{corollary:c-star-normal-spectral-radius-corollary}
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $x \in A$ be normal, then:
\begin{enumerate}
\item There exists $\lambda \in \sigma_A(x)$ such that $|\lambda| = \norm{x}_A$.
\item If there exists $n \in \natp$ such that $x^n = 0$, then $x = 0$ as well.
\end{enumerate}
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof}
(1): Since $\sigma_A(x)$ is compact, there exisst $\lambda \in \sigma_A(x)$ such that $|\lambda| = [x]_{sp}$. By \autoref{theorem:c-star-normal-spectral-radius}, $|\lambda| = [x]_{sp} = \norm{x}_A$.
(2): By the \hyperref[Spectral Mapping Theorem]{theorem:spectral-mapping-holomorphic},
\[
\bracs{\lambda^n| \lambda \in \sigma_A(x)} = \bracs{0}
\]
Thus $\sigma_A(x) = \bracs{0}$. By \autoref{theorem:c-star-normal-spectral-radius}, $\norm{x}_A = [x]_{sp} = 0$.
\end{proof}
\begin{corollary}
\label{corollary:c-star-unique-norm}
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra over $\complex$, then for each $x \in A$,
\[
\norm{x}_A^2 = \sup\bracs{|\lambda|\ | \lambda \in \sigma_A(x^*x)}
\]
In particular, there exists at most one norm on $A$ making it a $C^*$-algebra.
\end{corollary}
\begin{proof}
Since $x^*x$ is self-adjoint, \autoref{theorem:c-star-normal-spectral-radius} implies that
\[
\norm{x}_A^2 = \norm{x^*x}_A = \sup\bracs{|\lambda|\ | \lambda \in \sigma_A(x^*x)}
\]
which depends only on the algebraic structure of $A$.
\end{proof}
\begin{proposition}
\label{proposition:self-adjoint-spectrum}
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $x \in A$ be self-adjoint, then $\sigma_A(x) \subset \real$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}
Let
\[
y = \exp(ix) = \sum_{n = 0}^\infty \frac{i^nx^n}{n!}
\]
then
\[
y^*= \sum_{n = 0}^\infty \frac{(-i)^n (x^*)^n}{n!} = \exp(-ix^*)
\]
Since $x$ is normal, $y$ is also normal. By \autoref{proposition:functional-calculus-exp},,
\[
y^*y = \exp(-ix^* + ix) = \exp(-ix + ix) = 1
\]
so $y$ is unitary. By \autoref{proposition:unitary-spectrum} and the \hyperref[Spectral Mapping Theorem]{theorem:spectral-mapping-holomorphic}, $\exp(i\sigma_A(x)) = \sigma_A(y) \subset \partial B_\complex(0, 1)$. Thus $i\sigma_A(x) \subset \bracs{\text{Re} = 0}$, and $\sigma_A(x) \subset \real$.
\end{proof}

55
src/op/c-star/unitary.tex Normal file
View File

@@ -0,0 +1,55 @@
\section{Unitary Elements}
\label{section:unitary-c-star}
\begin{definition}[Unitary]
\label{definition:unitary-element}
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $x \in A$, then $x$ is \textbf{unitary} if $x \in G(A)$ and $x^* = x^{-1}$.
\end{definition}
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma:unitary-unit}
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $x \in A$ be unitary, then $\norm{x}_A = 1$.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
$\normn{x^2}_A = \norm{xx^*}_A = \norm{1}_A = 1$.
\end{proof}
\begin{definition}[Unitarily Equivalent]
\label{definition:unitary-equivalent}
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $x, y \in A$, then $x$ and $y$ are \textbf{unitarily equivalent} if there exists a unitary element $u \in A$ such that $x = uyu^*$.
\end{definition}
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma:unitary-equivalent-same-stuff}
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $x, y \in A$ be unitarily equivalent, then:
\begin{enumerate}
\item $\norm{x}_A = \norm{y}_A$.
\item $\sigma_A(x) = \sigma_A(y)$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
(1): Let $u \in A$ be unitary such that $x = uyu^*$, then $\norm{x}_A \le \norm{u}_A\norm{x}_A\normn{u^*}_A$. By \autoref{lemma:unitary-unit} and (1) of \autoref{proposition:c-star-algebra-gymnastics}, $\norm{u}_A = \normn{u^*}_A = 1$, so $\norm{x}_A \le \norm{y}_A$. As the argument is symmetric, $\norm{x}_A = \norm{y}_A$.
(2): Let $\lambda \in \complex$, then
\[
u(y - \lambda)u^* = uyu^* - \lambda uu^* = uyu^* - \lambda = x - \lambda
\]
Since $u, u^* \in G(A)$, $x - \lambda \in G(A)$ if and only if $y - \lambda \in G(A)$. Therefore $\sigma_A(x) = \sigma_A(y)$.
\end{proof}
\begin{proposition}
\label{proposition:unitary-spectrum}
Let $A$ be a unital $C^*$-algebra and $x \in A$ be unitary, then $\sigma_A(x) \subset \partial B_\complex(0, 1)$.
\end{proposition}
\begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[Proposition II.8.2]{Zhu}}}. ]
By \autoref{lemma:unitary-unit}, $\norm{x}_A = 1$, so $\sigma_A(x) \subset \ol{B_\complex(0, 1)}$. Thus
\[
\bracsn{\ol{\lambda}|\lambda \in \sigma_A(x)} = \sigma_A(x^*) = \sigma_A(x^{-1}) \subset \ol{\complex \setminus B_\complex(0, 1)}
\]
by (4) of \autoref{proposition:c-star-algebra-gymnastics}. For any $\lambda \in \complex$, $\lambda \in \ol{B_\complex(0, 1)}$ and $\ol \lambda \in \ol{\complex \setminus B_\complex(0, 1)}$ if and only if $|\lambda| = 1$. Therefore $\sigma_A(x) \subset \partial B_\complex(0, 1)$.
\end{proof}