From 51a74243a03348f948c2ab63c94e6fdb5148e943 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bokuan Li Date: Sat, 15 Aug 2026 15:34:26 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Added the spectral integral isomorphism. --- src/measure/vector/fin.tex | 44 ---------------- src/op/example/bb.tex | 56 ++++++++++++++++++++ src/op/example/index.tex | 1 + src/op/vn/fc.tex | 105 ++++++++++++++++++++++++++----------- 4 files changed, 131 insertions(+), 75 deletions(-) create mode 100644 src/op/example/bb.tex diff --git a/src/measure/vector/fin.tex b/src/measure/vector/fin.tex index 3e836b0..fe4a563 100644 --- a/src/measure/vector/fin.tex +++ b/src/measure/vector/fin.tex @@ -118,50 +118,6 @@ Despite not covering the full dual space, the bounded Borel functions still form \end{proof} -The following is an explicit construction of what should be the Arens product on $C(X; \complex)^{**}$ thanks to the above description of $M_R(X; \complex)$ and its dual. - -\begin{proposition} -\label{proposition:measures-dual-algebra} - Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space, $J: C(X; \complex) \to C(X; \complex)^{**}$ be the natural embedding, and $B$ be the closed unit ball of $C(X; \complex)^{**}$, then - \begin{enumerate} - \item There exists a unique weak*-continuous involution $C(X; \complex)^{**}$ such that $J(f^*) = J(f)^*$ for all $f \in C(X; \complex)$, given by - \[ - C(X; \complex)^{**} \to C(X; \complex)^{**} \quad \dpn{\mu, \phi^*}{C(X; \complex)^*} = \ol{\dpn{\mu, \phi}{C(X; \complex)^*}} - \] - \item There exists a unique seperately weak*-continuous bilinear map on $C(X; \complex)^{**}$ such that $J(fg) = J(f)J(g)$ for all $f, g \in C(X; \complex)$. - \item $C(X; \complex)^{**}$ equipped with the above involution and product is a commutative unital $C^*$-algebra. - \end{enumerate} -\end{proposition} -\begin{proof} - It is sufficient to construct the maps in (1) and (2). Let $\seqi{\mu}$ be a maximal mutually singular family of Radon measures on $X$. Using \autoref{theorem:hilbert-measures-dual} and the \hyperref[Riesz Representation Theorem]{theorem:riesz-radon-c0}, identify - \[ - C(X; \complex)^{*} = M_R(X; \complex) = [l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)] \quad C(X; \complex)^{**} = [l^\infty(I); L^\infty(\mu_i; \complex)] - \] - - Under the above, $C(X; \complex)$ may be identified as the diagonal - \[ - \bracsn{f \in C(X; \complex)^I|f_i = f_j \forall i, j \in I} \subset [l^\infty(I); L^\infty(\mu_i; \complex)] - \] - - which is weak*-dense in $[l^\infty(I); L^\infty(\mu_i; \complex)]$ by \hyperref[Goldstine's Theorem]{corollary:weak-dense-unit-ball}. - - (1): For each $g \in [l^\infty(I); L^\infty(\mu_i; \complex)]$, let $g^* = \ol g$. For any $\mu \in [l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)]$, - \[ - \dpn{\mu, g^*}{[l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)]} = \dpn{f, \ol g}{[l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)]} = \ol{\dpn{f, g}{[l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)]}} - \] - - so the conjugation map is weak*-continuous. - - (2): Let $f, g \in [l^\infty(I); L^\infty(\mu_i; \complex)]$ and $\mu \in [l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)]$, - \[ - \dpn{\mu, fg}{[l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)]} = \dpn{f\mu, g}{[l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)]} = \dpn{g\mu, f}{[l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)]} - \] - - so the composition map is separately weak*-continuous. - - (3): $[l^\infty(I); L^\infty(\mu_i; \complex)]$ is a commutative unital $C^*$-algebra. -\end{proof} - \begin{proposition} \label{proposition:space-of-measures-extreme-points} Let $X$ be an LCH space and $\cm \subset \overline{B_{M_R(X; \complex)}(0, 1)}$ be a compact convex set such that: diff --git a/src/op/example/bb.tex b/src/op/example/bb.tex new file mode 100644 index 0000000..cd13466 --- /dev/null +++ b/src/op/example/bb.tex @@ -0,0 +1,56 @@ +\section{$L^\infty$} +\label{section:l-infty-algebra} + + +\begin{proposition} +\label{proposition:measures-dual-algebra} + Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space and $\mathscr{M} \subset M_R(X; \complex)$ be a closed subspace such that: + \begin{enumerate} + \item[(A)] For each $\mu \in \mathscr{M}$ and $\nu \in M_R(X; \complex)$ with $\nu \ll \mu$, $\nu \in \mathscr{M}$. + \end{enumerate} + + and + \[ + J: C(X; \complex) \to \mathscr{M}^* \quad \dpn{\mu, J(f)}{\mathscr{M}} = \int f d\mu + \] + + then + \begin{enumerate} + \item $J(C(X; \complex))$ is weak*-dense in $\mathscr{M}^*$. + \item There exists a unique weak*-continuous involution on $\mathscr{M}^*$ such that $J(f^*) = J(f)^*$ for all $f \in C(X; \complex)$, given by + \[ + \dpn{\mu, \phi^*}{C(X; \complex)^*} = \ol{\dpn{\mu, \phi}{C(X; \complex)^*}} + \] + \item There exists a unique seperately weak*-continuous bilinear map on $\mathscr{M}^*$ such that $J(fg) = J(f)J(g)$ for all $f, g \in C(X; \complex)$. + \item $\mathscr{M}^{*}$ equipped with the above involution and product is a commutative unital $C^*$-algebra. + \end{enumerate} +\end{proposition} +\begin{proof} + Let $\seqi{\mu}$ be a maximal mutually singular family of Radon measures on $X$. Using \autoref{theorem:hilbert-measures-dual} and the \hyperref[Riesz Representation Theorem]{theorem:riesz-radon-c0}, identify + \[ + \mathscr{M} = [l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)] \quad \mathscr{M}^* = [l^\infty(I); L^\infty(\mu_i; \complex)] + \] + + (1): Under the above, $C(X; \complex)$ may be identified as the diagonal + \[ + \bracsn{f \in C(X; \complex)^I|f_i = f_j \forall i, j \in I} \subset [l^\infty(I); L^\infty(\mu_i; \complex)] + \] + + By \hyperref[Goldstine's Theorem]{corollary:weak-dense-unit-ball}, $C(X; \complex)$ is weak*-dense in $C(X; \complex)^{**}$. As a result, $J(C(X; \complex))$ is weak*-dense in $\mathscr{M}^*$. + + (2): For each $g \in [l^\infty(I); L^\infty(\mu_i; \complex)]$, let $g^* = \ol g$. For any $\mu \in [l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)]$, + \[ + \dpn{\mu, g^*}{[l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)]} = \dpn{f, \ol g}{[l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)]} = \ol{\dpn{f, g}{[l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)]}} + \] + + so the conjugation map is weak*-continuous. + + (3): Let $f, g \in [l^\infty(I); L^\infty(\mu_i; \complex)]$ and $\mu \in [l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)]$, + \[ + \dpn{\mu, fg}{[l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)]} = \dpn{f\mu, g}{[l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)]} = \dpn{g\mu, f}{[l^1(I); L^1(\mu_i; \complex)]} + \] + + so the composition map is separately weak*-continuous. + + (4): $[l^\infty(I); L^\infty(\mu_i; \complex)]$ is a commutative unital $C^*$-algebra. +\end{proof} \ No newline at end of file diff --git a/src/op/example/index.tex b/src/op/example/index.tex index 9a12f24..ddf1ba0 100644 --- a/src/op/example/index.tex +++ b/src/op/example/index.tex @@ -8,3 +8,4 @@ \input{./disk.tex} \input{./convolution.tex} \input{./bc.tex} +\input{./bb.tex} diff --git a/src/op/vn/fc.tex b/src/op/vn/fc.tex index c5b5e7f..cd7ef7c 100644 --- a/src/op/vn/fc.tex +++ b/src/op/vn/fc.tex @@ -1,4 +1,4 @@ -\section{The Borel Functional Calculus} +\section{The $L^\infty$ Functional Calculus} \label{section:borel-functional-calculus} \begin{definition}[Spectral Measure] @@ -18,23 +18,16 @@ \end{definition} -\begin{definition}[Integration Against a Spectral Measure] -\label{definition:spectral-measure-integral} - Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space, $H$ be a complex Hilbert space, and $E: \cb_X \to B(H)$ be a spectral measure. Define - \[ - I_E: C(X; \complex)^{**} \to B(H) \quad \phi \mapsto \int_X \phi dE - \] - - where for each $x, y \in H$, $\angles{I_E(\phi) \cdot x, y}_{H} = \dpn{E_{x, y}, \phi}{C(X; \complex)^*}$, then: +\begin{lemma} +\label{lemma:spectral-measure-properties} + Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space, $H$ be a complex Hilbert space, and $E: \cb_X \to B(H)$ be a spectral measure relative to $H$, then: \begin{enumerate} - \item $I_E$ is continuous from the weak*-topology on $C(X; \complex)^{**}$ to the weak operator topology on $B(H)$. - \item $I_E$ is a unital *-homomorphism. + \item For each $x, y \in H$, $\norm{E_{x, y}}_{\text{var}} \le \norm{x}_H \norm{y}_H$. + \item Let $\mathscr{E} \subset M_R(X; \complex)$ be the closed subspace generated by $\bracsn{E_{x, y}|x, y \in H}$, then for any $\mu \in \mathscr{E}$ and $\nu \in M_R(X; \complex)$ with $\nu \ll \mu$, $\nu \in \mathscr{E}$ as well. \end{enumerate} - - For any $\phi \in C(X; \complex)^{**}$, $I_E(\phi) = \int_X \phi dE$ is the \textbf{integral} of $\phi$ with respect to $E$. -\end{definition} +\end{lemma} \begin{proof} - Firstly, let $x, y \in H$, $\seqf{B_j} \subset \cb_X$ be disjoint Borel sets, and $B = \bigsqcup_{j = 1}^n B_j$, then for each $1 \le i < j \le n$, $E(B_i)(H) \perp E(B_j)(H)$, so by the \hyperref[Cauchy-Schwarz inequality]{proposition:cauchy-schwarz} and the \hyperref[Pythagorean Theorem]{theorem:pythagoras}, + (1): Let $x, y \in H$, $\seqf{B_j} \subset \cb_X$ be disjoint Borel sets, and $B = \bigsqcup_{j = 1}^n B_j$, then for each $1 \le i < j \le n$, $E(B_i)(H) \perp E(B_j)(H)$, so by the \hyperref[Cauchy-Schwarz inequality]{proposition:cauchy-schwarz} and the \hyperref[Pythagorean Theorem]{theorem:pythagoras}, \begin{align*} \sum_{j = 1}^n |\dpn{E(B_j)x, y}{H}| &= \sum_{j = 1}^n |\dpn{E(B_j)x, E(B_j)y}{H}| \\ &\le \sum_{j = 1}^n \norm{E(B_j)x}_H \norm{E(B_j)y}_H \\ @@ -42,37 +35,87 @@ &= \norm{E(B)x}_H \cdot \norm{E(B)y}_H \le \norm{x}_H \cdot \norm{y}_H \end{align*} - As the above holds for all finite sequences of disjoint Borel sets, $\norm{E_{x, y}}_{C(X; \complex)^*} \le \norm{x}_H \norm{y}_H$. Thus for any $\phi \in C(X; \complex)^{**}$, + As the above holds for all finite sequences of disjoint Borel sets, $\norm{E_{x, y}}_{\text{var}} \le \norm{x}_H \norm{y}_H$. + + (2): For each $x, y \in H$ and $B, C \in \cb_X$, + \[ + \int_C \one_B dE_{x, y} = \dpn{E(C \cap B)x, y}{H} = \dpn{E(C)E(B)x, y}{H} = E_{E(B)x, y}(C) + \] + + By linearity, $fdE_{x, y} \in \mathscr{E}$ for all $f \in \Sigma(X; \complex)$. For each $f \in \Sigma(X; \complex)$, the mapping $\mu \mapsto f d\mu$ is continuous in the total variation norm, so $fd\mu \in \mathscr{E}$ for all $\mu \in \mathscr{E}$ and $f \in \Sigma(X; \complex)$. By \autoref{proposition:lp-simple-dense}, $\Sigma(X; \complex)$ is dense in $L^1(\mu; \complex)$ for all $\mu \in \mathscr{E}$. Therefore $fd\mu \in \mathscr{E}$ for all $f \in L^1(\mu; \complex)$ and $\mu \in \mathscr{E}$. + + Finally, let $\mu \in \mathscr{E}$ and $\nu \in M_R(X; \complex)$ with $\nu \ll \mu$, then by the \hyperref[Radon-Nikodym Theorem]{theorem:lebesgue-radon-nikodym}, there exists $f \in L^1(\mu; \complex)$ such that $d\nu = f d\mu \in \mathscr{E}$. +\end{proof} + + +\begin{definition}[Integration Against Spectral Measure] +\label{definition:spectral-measure-integral} + Let $X$ be a compact Hausdorff space, $H$ be a complex Hilbert space, $E: \cb_X \to B(H)$ be a spectral measure relative to $H$, $\mathscr{E} \subset M_R(X; \complex)$ be the closed subspace generated by $\bracsn{E_{x, y}|x, y \in H}$, and + \[ + J: B^\infty(X; \complex) \to \mathscr{E}^* \quad \dpn{\mu, J(f)}{\mathscr{E}} = \int_X f d\mu + \] + + Then, $\mathscr{E}^*$ admits a unique weak*-continuous involution and a unique separately weak*-continuous product, such that $\mathscr{E}^*$ is a commutative unital $C^*$-algebra, and $J$ is a unital *-homomorphism. + + For each $\phi \in \mathscr{E}^*$, let $I_E(\phi) \in B(H)$ be the operator defined by + \[ + \dpn{I_E(\phi) \cdot x, y}{H} = \dpn{E_{x, y}, \phi}{\mathscr{E}} \quad \forall x, y \in H + \] + + then + + \begin{enumerate} + \item $I_E$ is a contraction from $\mathscr{E}^*$ to $B(H)$. + \item $I_E$ is continuous from the weak*-topology on $\mathscr{E}^*$ to the weak operator topology on $B(H)$. + \item $I_E$ is an injective unital *-homomorphism. + \end{enumerate} + + For any $\phi \in \mathscr{E}^*$, $I_E(\phi) = \int_X \phi dE$ is the \textbf{integral} of $\phi$ with respect to $E$. +\end{definition} +\begin{proof} + ($C^*$ Structure of $\mathscr{E}^*$): By \autoref{lemma:spectral-measure-properties}, for any $\mu \in \mathscr{E}$ and $f \in L^1(\mu; \complex)$, $fd\mu \in \mathscr{E}$ as well. By \autoref{proposition:measures-dual-algebra}, there exists a unique weak*-continuous involution and separately weak*-continuous product on $\mathscr{E}^*$ making $\mathscr{E}^*$ a commutative unital $C^*$-algebra, and $J|_{C(X; \complex)}$ a unital *-homomorphism. Since + \begin{enumerate}[label=(\roman*)] + \item $J$ is $\sigma(B^\infty(X; \complex), M_R(X; \complex))$-$\sigma(\mathscr{E}^*, \mathscr{E})$ continuous. + \item Conjugation on $B^\infty(X; \complex)$ is $\sigma(B^\infty(X; \complex), M_R(X; \complex))$-continuous. + \item Multiplication on $B^\infty(X; \complex)$ is separately $\sigma(B^\infty(X; \complex), M_R(X; \complex))$-continuous. + \end{enumerate} + + the mapping $J$ is a unital *-homomorphism. + + (1): Let $\phi \in \mathscr{E}^*$ and $x, y \in H$, then \begin{align*} - |\dpn{I_E(\phi) \cdot x, y}{H}| &= |\dpn{E_{x, y}, \phi}{C(X; \complex)^*}| \le \norm{E_{x, y}}_{C(X; \complex)^*} \cdot \norm{\phi}_{C(X; \complex)^{**}} \\ - &\le \norm{\phi}_{C(X; \complex)^{**}} \cdot \norm{x}_H \cdot \norm{y}_H + |\dpn{I_E(\phi) \cdot x, y}{H}| &= |\dpn{E_{x, y}, \phi}{\mathscr{E}}| \le \norm{E_{x, y}}_{\mathscr{E}} \cdot \norm{\phi}_{\mathscr{E}^{*}} \\ + &\le \norm{\phi}_{\mathscr{E}^{*}} \cdot \norm{x}_H \cdot \norm{y}_H \end{align*} - Since the above holds for all $x, y \in H$, $I_E(\phi) \in B(H)$ with $\norm{I_E(\phi)}_{B(H)} \le \norm{\phi}_{C(X; \complex)^{**}}$. - + Since the above holds for all $x, y \in H$, $I_E(\phi) \in B(H)$ with $\norm{I_E(\phi)}_{B(H)} \le \norm{\phi}_{\mathscr{E}^{*}}$. - (1): For each $x, y \in H$, $E_{x, y} \in C(X; \complex)^*$. Since $\angles{\int \phi dE \cdot x, y}_{H} = \dpn{E_{x, y}, \phi}{C(X; \complex)^*}$ for every $\phi \in C(X; \complex)^{**}$, $I_E$ is continuous from the weak* topology on $C(X; \complex)^{**}$ to the weak operator topology on $B(H)$. + (2): For each $x, y \in H$, $E_{x, y} \in \mathscr{E}$. Since $\angles{\int \phi dE \cdot x, y}_{H} = \dpn{E_{x, y}, \phi}{\mathscr{E}}$ for every $\phi \in \mathscr{E}^{*}$, $I_E$ is continuous from the weak* topology on $\mathscr{E}^{*}$ to the weak operator topology on $B(H)$. - (2): By \autoref{lemma:separable-metric-space-approx-identity}, the simple functions $\Sigma(X; \complex)$ are uniformly dense in the bounded Borel functions $B^\infty(X; \complex)$. Since + (3): By \autoref{lemma:separable-metric-space-approx-identity}, the simple functions $\Sigma(X; \complex)$ are uniformly dense in the bounded Borel functions $B^\infty(X; \complex)$. Since \begin{enumerate}[label=(\roman*)] - \item $I_E$ restricted to $\Sigma(X; \complex)$ is a *-homomorphism. + \item $I_E$ restricted to $J(\Sigma(X; \complex))$ is a *-homomorphism. \item Multiplication and conjugation are continuous in the uniform norm on $B^\infty(X; \complex)$ - \item Composition and transposition are continuous in the operator norm on $B(H)$ + \item Composition and adjunction are continuous in the operator norm on $B(H)$ \end{enumerate} - the map $I_E$ restricted to $B^\infty(X; \complex)$ is a *-homomorphism by continuity. By \hyperref[Goldstine's Theorem]{corollary:weak-dense-unit-ball}, $C(X; \complex) \subset B^\infty(X; \complex)$ is weak*-dense in $C(X; \complex)^{**}$. So as + the map $I_E$ restricted to $J(B^\infty(X; \complex))$ is a *-homomorphism by continuity. + + By \hyperref[Goldstine's Theorem]{corollary:weak-dense-unit-ball}, $C(X; \complex) \subset B^\infty(X; \complex)$ is weak*-dense in $C(X; \complex)^{**}$, so $J(C(X; \complex))$ is weak*-dense in $\mathscr{E}^*$. As \begin{enumerate}[label=(\roman*)] - \item $I_E$ restricted to $B^\infty(X; \complex)$ is a *-homomorphism. - \item The involution $\phi \mapsto \ol \phi$ is weak*-continuous on $C(X; \complex)^{**}$. - \item The transpose $T \mapsto T^*$ is weak-operator continuous on $B(H)$. - \item The product $(\phi, \psi) \mapsto \phi \psi$ is separately weak*-continuous on $C(X; \complex)^{**}$. + \item $I_E$ restricted to $J(B^\infty(X; \complex))$ is a *-homomorphism. + \item The involution $\phi \mapsto \ol \phi$ is weak*-continuous on $\mathscr{E}^{*}$. + \item The adjunction $T \mapsto T^*$ is weak-operator continuous on $B(H)$. + \item The product $(\phi, \psi) \mapsto \phi \psi$ is separately weak*-continuous on $\mathscr{E}^{*}$. \item The composition $(S, T) \mapsto ST$ is separately weak-operator continuous on $B(H)$. \end{enumerate} - the map $I_E$ is a *-homomorphism by (1). Finally, since $E(X) = I_{B(H)}$, $I_E$ is a unital *-homomorphism. + the map $I_E$ is a *-homomorphism by the weak* to weak-operator continuity established in (2). Since $E(X) = I_{B(H)}$, $I_E$ is a unital *-homomorphism. + + Finally, let $\phi \in \mathscr{E}^*$ with $I_E(\phi) = 0$, then $\dpn{I_E(\phi)x, y}{H} = \dpn{E_{x, y}, \phi}{\mathscr{E}} = 0$ for all $x, y \in H$. As $\mathscr{E}$ is the closed subspace generated by $\bracsn{E_{x, y}|x, y \in H}$, $\phi = 0$. Therefore $I_E$ is an injective unital *-homomorphism. \end{proof} -\begin{theorem}[Spectral Theorem (I)] +\begin{theorem}[Spectral Theorem I] \label{theorem:spectral-theorem-vn-1} Let $H$ be a complex Hilbert space and $A \subset B(H)$ be a commutative $C^*$-subalgebra with $I \in A$, then: \begin{enumerate}