Added Lusin's theorem.

This commit is contained in:
Bokuan Li
2026-03-14 19:55:29 -04:00
parent 3778616075
commit 4687e9e4fc
4 changed files with 99 additions and 2 deletions

View File

@@ -50,3 +50,12 @@
Finally, if the above functions are $\real$-valued, then they are $(\cm, \cb_\real)$-measurable by \autoref{lemma:extended-real-measurable}.
\end{proof}
\begin{lemma}
\label{lemma:monotone-measurable}
Let $f: \real \to \real$ be a non-decreasing or non-increasing function, then $f$ is Borel measurable.
\end{lemma}
\begin{proof}
By taking $-f$, assume without loss of generality that $f$ is non-decreasing. In which case, for any $a \in \real$, $x \in f^{-1}((-\infty, a])$, and $y \le x$, $f(y) \le f(x) \le a$, so $y \in f^{-1}((-\infty, a])$. Thus $f^{-1}((-\infty, a))$ is an interval and hence measurable. Since the open rays generate $\cb_\real$ (\autoref{proposition:borel-sigma-real-generators}), $f$ is Borel measurable.
\end{proof}

View File

@@ -159,5 +159,47 @@
\[
\norm{x \cdot \one_A - x \cdot f}_{L^p(X; E)} \le \norm{x}_E \mu(\bracs{f \ne \one_A})^{1/p} \le \norm{x}_E\mu(U \setminus K)^{1/p} < \eps^{1/p}\norm{x}_E
\]
\end{proof}
\begin{theorem}[Lusin, {{\cite[Theorem 7.10]{Folland}}}]
\label{theorem:lusin}
Let $X$ be a LCH space, $\mu$ be a Radon measure on $X$, $E$ be a normed vector space, and $f: X \to E$ be a measurable function with $\mu\bracs{f \ne 0} < \infty$, then for any $\eps > 0$,
\begin{enumerate}
\item There exists $A \subset \bracs{f \ne 0}$ such that $f|_A$ is continuous and $\mu(\bracs{f \ne 0} \setminus A) < \eps$
\item If $E = \complex$, then there exists $\phi \in C_c(X; E)$ such that $\mu\bracs{f \ne \phi} < \eps$.
\item If $E = \complex$ and $f$ is bounded, then $\phi$ can be taken such that $\norm{\phi}_u \le \norm{f}_u$.
\end{enumerate}
\end{theorem}
\begin{proof}
First assume that $f$ is bounded.
(1, bounded): If $f$ is bounded, then $f \in L^1(X; E)$. By \autoref{proposition:radon-cc-dense}, there exists $\seq{\phi_n} \subset C_c(X)$ such that $\phi_n \to f$ in $L^1(\mu)$. Since $\phi_n \to f$ in $L^1(\mu)$, $\phi_n \to f$ in measure by \autoref{proposition:lp-in-measure}. By taking a subsequence using \ref{proposition:cauchy-in-measure-limit}, assume without loss of generality that $\phi_n \to f$ almost everywhere.
By \hyperref[Egoroff's Theorem]{theorem:egoroff}, there exists $A \subset \bracs{f \ne 0}$ such that $\phi_n \to f$ uniformly and $\mu(\bracs{f \ne 0} \setminus A) < \eps/3$. By \autoref{proposition:radon-regular-sigma-finite}, there exists $K \subset A$ compact such that $\mu(A \setminus K) < \eps/3$.
Let $\phi_0 = \lim_{n \to \infty}\phi_n$ on $K$, then $\phi_0 \in C(K; E)$ by \autoref{proposition:uniform-limit-continuous}, $\phi_0 = f$ almost everywhere on $K$, and $\mu(\bracs{f \ne 0} \setminus K) < \eps$.
(2, bounded): By outer regularity, there exists $U \in \cn^o(\bracs{f \ne 0})$ such that $\mu(U \setminus \bracs{f \ne 0}) < \eps/3$.
By the \hyperref[Tietze Extension Theorem]{theorem:lch-tietze}, there exists $\phi \in C_c(X; \complex)$ such that $\phi|_K = \phi_0$ and $\supp{\phi} \subset U$. In which case,
\[
\mu\bracs{\phi \ne f} \le \underbrace{\mu(\bracs{f \ne 0} \setminus K)}_{< 2\eps/3} + \underbrace{\mu(U \setminus \bracs{f \ne 0})}_{< \eps/3} < \eps
\]
(3): Let
\[
\psi: \complex \to \complex \quad z \mapsto \begin{cases}
z &|z| \le \norm{f}_u \\
z\norm{f}_u/|z| &|z| > \norm{f}_u
\end{cases}
\]
then $\psi$ is continuous with $\bracs{\phi = f} = \bracs{\psi \circ \phi = f}$ and $\norm{\psi \circ \phi}_u \le \norm{f}_u$.
Now assume that $f$ is arbitrary.
(1, unbounded): Since $\mu\bracs{f \ne 0} < \infty$, there exists $\alpha > 0$ such that $\mu\bracs{|f| > \alpha} < \eps/2$. Let $g \in L^\infty(X; E)$ such that $g = f$ on $\bracs{|f| \le \alpha}$. By (1) applied to $g$, there exists $A \subset \bracs{|f| \le \alpha}$ such that $f|_A$ is continuous and $\mu(\bracs{|f| \le \alpha} \setminus A) < \eps/2$. In which case, $\mu(\bracs{f \ne 0} \setminus A) < \eps$, as desired.
(2, unbounded): By (1) applied to $g$, there exists $\phi \in C_c(X; \complex)$ such that $\mu\bracs{\phi \ne g} < \eps/2$, and $\mu(\bracs{\phi \ne f}) < \eps$.
\end{proof}