Added definition of holomorphic functions.
All checks were successful
Compile Project / Compile (push) Successful in 34s
All checks were successful
Compile Project / Compile (push) Successful in 34s
This commit is contained in:
@@ -34,13 +34,13 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}[Cauchy]
|
||||
\label{theorem:cauchy-homotopy}
|
||||
Let $E$ be a separated locally convex space over $\complex$, $U \subset \complex$ be open, $f \in C^1(U; E)$, and $\gamma, \mu \in C([a, b]; \complex)$ be closed, rectifiable paths. If $\gamma$ and $\mu$ are homotopic, then
|
||||
Let $E$ be a complete separated locally convex space over $\complex$, $U \subset \complex$ be open, $f \in C^1(U; E)$, and $\gamma, \mu \in C([a, b]; U)$ be closed rectifiable paths. If $\gamma$ and $\mu$ are homotopic, then
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\int_\gamma f = \int_\mu f
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
\begin{proof}[Proof of smooth case. ]
|
||||
Let $\Gamma \in C^\infty([0, 1] \times [a, b]; \complex)$ be a smooth homotopy of loops from $\gamma$ to $\mu$, and
|
||||
Let $\Gamma \in C^\infty([0, 1] \times [a, b]; U)$ be a smooth homotopy of loops from $\gamma$ to $\mu$, and
|
||||
\[
|
||||
F: [0, 1] \to E \quad t \mapsto \int_{\Gamma (t, \cdot)}f = \int_a^b (f \circ \Gamma)(t, s) \Gamma(t, ds)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
@@ -93,7 +93,7 @@
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
Furthermore, by passing through a reparametrisation, assume without loss of generality that:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*)]
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\alph*),start=1]
|
||||
\item For each $t \in [0, \eps)$, $\Gamma(t, \cdot) = \gamma$.
|
||||
\item For each $t \in (1 - \eps, 1]$, $\Gamma(t, \cdot) = \mu$.
|
||||
\item For each $t \in [0, 1]$, $\Gamma$ is constant on $\bracs{t} \times ([a, a + \eps] \cup [b - \eps, b])$.
|
||||
@@ -138,5 +138,146 @@
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}
|
||||
\label{definition:winding-number-1}
|
||||
Let $U \subset \complex$, $z_0 \in U$, and $r > 0$ such that $\ol{B(z_0, r)} \subset U$, then the path
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\omega_{z_0, r}: [0, 2\pi] \to U \quad \theta \mapsto a + re^{i\theta}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
is the \textit{standard path of winding number $1$} at $a$ with radius $r$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}[Cauchy's Integral Formula]
|
||||
\label{theorem:cauchy-formula}
|
||||
Let $E$ be a complete separated locally convex space over $\complex$, $U \subset \complex$ be open, $z_0 \in U$, $r > 0$ such that $\ol{B(z_0, r)} \subset U$, $\gamma \in C([a, b]; \complex)$ be a closed, rectifiable path homotopic to $\omega_{z_0, r}$ on $U \setminus \bracs{z_0}$, and $f \in C^1(U; E)$, then
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item $\int_\gamma f = 0$.
|
||||
\item $f(z) = \frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_\gamma \frac{f(z)}{z - z_0}dz$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
More over, for any $g \in C(U; E)$ that satisfies (2) for all $z_0 \in U$, $r > 0$ with $\ol{B(z_0, r)} \subset U$, closed rectifiable curve $\gamma \in C([a, b]; \complex)$ homotopic to $\omega_{z_0, r}$ on $U \setminus \bracs{z_0}$,
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}[start=2]
|
||||
\item $g \in C^\infty(U; E)$, where for each $k \in \natz$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
D^kg(z_0) = \frac{k!}{2\pi i}\int_{\gamma} \frac{g(z)}{(z - z_0)^{k+1}}dz
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
By \autoref{theorem:cauchy-homotopy} and the \hyperref[change of variables formula]{theorem:rs-change-of-variables}, for any $g \in C^1(U \setminus \bracs{z_0}; E)$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\int_\gamma g = \lim_{s \downto 0} \int_{\omega_{z_0, s}} g = \int_0^{2\pi}
|
||||
= \lim_{s \downto 0}\frac{s}{2\pi} \int_{0}^{2\pi} g \circ \omega_{z_0, s}(\theta) e^{i\theta} d\theta
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
(1): Since $f \in C(U; E)$, $f$ is bounded on $\ol{B(z_0, r)}$, so for any $s \in (0, r)$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\frac{s}{2\pi} \int_{0}^{2\pi} f \circ \omega_{z_0, s}(\theta) e^{i\theta} d\theta \in s\ol{\text{Conv}}(f(\ol{B(z_0, r)}))
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
As $E$ is locally convex,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\int_\gamma g = \lim_{s \downto 0} \int_{\omega_{z_0, s}} g = 0
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
(2): Since $f \in C(U; E)$,
|
||||
\begin{align*}
|
||||
\frac{1}{2\pi i}\int_{\gamma} \frac{f(z)}{z - z_0}dz &= \lim_{s \downto 0}\frac{s}{2\pi} \int_{0}^{2\pi} \frac{f \circ \omega_{z_0, s}(\theta)}{\omega_{z_0, s}(\theta) - z_0} e^{i\theta} d\theta \\
|
||||
&= \lim_{s \downto 0}\frac{1}{2\pi}\int_0^{2\pi} f \circ \omega_{z_0, s}(\theta) d\theta = f(z_0)
|
||||
\end{align*}
|
||||
|
||||
(3): Suppose inductively that (3) holds for $k \in \natz$. For sufficiently small $h \in \complex$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\frac{D^kg(z_0 + h) -D^kg(z_0)}{h} = \frac{k!}{2\pi ih} \int_\gamma \frac{g(z)}{(z - z_0-h)^{k+1}} - \frac{g(z)}{(z- z_0)^{k+1}}dz
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
By \autoref{proposition:difference-quotient-compact},
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\lim_{h \to 0}\frac{D^kg(z_0 + h) -D^kg(z_0)}{h} = \frac{(k+1)!}{2\pi i} \int_\gamma \frac{g(z)}{(z - z_0)^{k+2}} dz
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
Therefore $g \in C^{k+1}(U; E)$ with
|
||||
\[
|
||||
D^{k+1}g(z_0) = \frac{(k+1)!}{2\pi i} \int_\gamma \frac{g(z)}{(z - z_0)^{k+2}} dz
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{corollary}[Cauchy's Estimate]
|
||||
\label{corollary:cauchy-estimate}
|
||||
Let $E$ be a complete separated locally convex space over $\complex$, $U \subset \complex$ be open, $z_0 \in U$, $r > 0$ such that $\ol{B(z_0, r)} \subset U$, then for any $k \in \natz$ and continuous seminorm $[\cdot]_E: E \to [0, \infty)$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
[D^kf(z_0)]_E \le \frac{k!}{r^k} \sup_{z \in \ol{B(z_0, r)}}[f(z)]_E
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{corollary}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
By \autoref[Cauchy's Integral Formula]{theorem:cauchy-formula} and \autoref{proposition:rs-bound},
|
||||
\begin{align*}
|
||||
D^kf(z_0) &= \frac{k!}{2\pi i}\int_{\omega_{z_0, r}} \frac{f(z)}{(z - z_0)^{k+1}}dz \\
|
||||
[D^kf(z_0)]_E &\le \frac{k!}{2\pi i}\int_0^{2\pi}\frac{[f(z)]_E}{|z - z_0|^{k+1}}dz \\
|
||||
&= \frac{k!}{2\pi i}\int_0^{2\pi}\frac{[f(z)]_E}{r^{k+1}}dz \le \frac{k!}{r^k} \sup_{z \in \ol{B(z_0, r)}}[f(z)]_E
|
||||
\end{align*}
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Complex Analytic]
|
||||
\label{definition:complex-analytic}
|
||||
Let $E$ be a complete separated locally convex space over $\complex$, $U \subset \complex$ be open, and $f \in C(U; E)$, then the following are equivalent:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item (\textbf{Complex Differentiability}) $f \in C^1(U; E)$.
|
||||
\item (\textbf{Cauchy-Riemann Equations}) Under the identification of $C = \real^2$, $\frac{\partial f}{\partial x}, \frac{\partial f}{\partial y} \in C(U; E)$ and
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\frac{\partial f}{\partial x} = i\frac{\partial f}{\partial y}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\item (\textbf{Cauchy's Integral Formula}) For each $z_0 \in U$, $r > 0$ such that $\ol{B(z_0, r)} \subset U$, and closed rectifiable path $\gamma \in C([a, b]; U)$ homotopic to $\omega_{z_0, r}$ on $U \setminus \bracs{z_0}$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
f(z_0) = \frac{1}{2\pi i} \int_\gamma \frac{f(z)}{z - z_0}dz
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\item (\textbf{Analyticity}) For each $z_0 \in U$ and $r > 0$ such that $\ol{B(z_0, r)} \subset U$, there exists $\seq{a_n} \subset E$ such that $f$ may be expressed as a power series
|
||||
\[
|
||||
f(z) = \sum_{n = 0}^\infty a_n(z - z_0)^n
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
with radius of convergence at least $r$.
|
||||
\item (\textbf{Weak Holomorphy}) For each $\phi \in E^*$, $\phi \circ f$ satisfies the above.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
If the above holds, then $f$ is \textbf{complex analytic}.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
(1) $\Leftrightarrow$ (2): \autoref{lemma:complex-analytic}.
|
||||
|
||||
(1) + (2) $\Rightarrow$ (3): See \hyperref[Cauchy's Integral Formula]{theorem:cauchy-formula}.
|
||||
|
||||
(3) $\Rightarrow$ (4): By \hyperref[Cauchy's Integral Formula]{theorem:cauchy-formula}, $f \in C^\infty(U; E)$ where for each $k \in \natz$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
D^kf(z_0) = \frac{k!}{2\pi i}\int_{\gamma} \frac{f(z)}{(z - z_0)^{k+1}}dz
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
Let
|
||||
\[
|
||||
g(z) = \sum_{k = 0}^\infty \frac{1}{k!} D^kf(z_0)(z - z_0)^n
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
then by \hyperref[Cauchy's Estimate]{corollary:cauchy-estimate}, for any $k \in \natz$ and continuous seminorm $[\cdot]_E: E \to [0, \infty)$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
[D^kf(z_0)]_E \le \frac{k!}{r^k} \sup_{z \in \ol{B(z_0, r)}}[f(z)]_E = \frac{Ck!}{r^k}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
Thus $[D^kf(z_0)/k!]_E \le C/r^k$ for all $k \in \natz$, and the radius of convergence of $g$ is at least $r$.
|
||||
|
||||
Let $z \in B(z_0, r/2)$, $s = |z - z_0|$, and $n \in \natp$, then by \hyperref[Taylor's Formula]{theorem:taylor-lagrange} and \hyperref[Cauchy's Estimate]{corollary:cauchy-estimate},
|
||||
\begin{align*}
|
||||
\braks{f(z) - \sum_{k = 0}^n \frac{1}{k!} D^kf(z_0)(z - z_0)^n}_E &\le s^{n+1} \cdot \sup_{z' \in \ol{B(z_0, s)}} [D^{n+1}f(z')]_E \\
|
||||
&\le \frac{Cs^{n+1}}{(r-s)^{n+1}}
|
||||
\end{align*}
|
||||
|
||||
which tends to $0$ as $n \to \infty$.
|
||||
|
||||
(4) $\Rightarrow$ (1): By \autoref{theorem:termwise-differentiation}.
|
||||
|
||||
(5) $\Rightarrow$ (3): By the equivalence of the prior points, for any $\phi \in E^*$, $\phi \circ f$ satisfies (3). By the \autoref[Hahn-Banach Theorem]{proposition:hahn-banach-utility}, $f$ also satisfies (3).
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user