Added universality of the zero-dimensional spaces.
This commit is contained in:
34
src/topology/dst/analytic.tex
Normal file
34
src/topology/dst/analytic.tex
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,34 @@
|
||||
\section{Analytic Sets}
|
||||
\label{section:analytic-sets}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Analytic Set]
|
||||
\label{definition:analytic-set}
|
||||
Let $X$ be a Polish space and $A \subset X$, then $A$ is \textbf{analytic} if there exists a Polish space $Z$ and $f \in C(Z; X)$ such that $f(Z) = A$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:analytic-sets}
|
||||
Let $X$ be a Polish space, then:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item For each family $\seq{A_n} \subset X$ of analytic sets, $\bigcup_{n \in \natp}A_n$ is analytic.
|
||||
\item For each family $\seq{A_n} \subset X$ of analytic sets, $\bigcap_{n \in \natp}A_n$ is analytic.
|
||||
\item For any $A \in \cb_X$, $A$ is analytic.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[Proposition 8.2.1-8.2.3]{CohnMeasure}}}. ]
|
||||
For each $n \in \natp$, let $Z_n$ be a Polish space and $f_n \in C(Z_n; X)$ such that $A_n = f_n(Z_n)$.
|
||||
|
||||
(1): By \autoref{proposition:polish-space-extension}, $Z = \bigsqcup_{n \in \natp}Z_n$ is a Polish space. Let $f \in C(Z; X)$ be the gluing of $\seq{f_n}$, then $\bigcup_{n \in \natp}A_n = f(Z)$.
|
||||
|
||||
(2): By \autoref{proposition:polish-space-extension}, $Z = \prod_{n \in \natp}Z_n$ is a Polish space. For each $m, n \in \natp$, $\bracs{f_m \circ \pi_m = f_n \circ \pi_n}$ is closed. Thus
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\Delta := \bigcap_{m \in \natp}\bigcap_{n \in \natp}\bracs{f_m \circ \pi_m = f_n \circ \pi_n}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
is closed, and Polish by \autoref{proposition:polish-space-extension}. Hence $\bigcap_{n \in \natp}A_n = f_1 \circ \pi_1(\Delta)$ is also analytic.
|
||||
|
||||
(3): By \autoref{proposition:polish-space-extension}, every open and closed subset of $X$ is analytic. Thus (1), (2), and \autoref{lemma:monotone-borel-characterisation} imply that every element of $\cb_X$ is analytic.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,3 +2,5 @@
|
||||
\label{chap:polish-spaces}
|
||||
|
||||
\input{./polish.tex}
|
||||
\input{./analytic.tex}
|
||||
\input{./zero.tex}
|
||||
|
||||
113
src/topology/dst/zero.tex
Normal file
113
src/topology/dst/zero.tex
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,113 @@
|
||||
\section{Zero Dimensional Spaces}
|
||||
\label{section:zero-dimensional}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Zero-Dimensional]
|
||||
\label{definition:zero-dimentional}
|
||||
Let $X$ be a topological space, then $X$ is \textbf{zero-dimensional} if $X$ admits a base consisting of clopen sets.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:zero-dimensional-extension}
|
||||
Let $\seqi{X}$ and $X$ be zero-dimensional spaces, then:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item For any $A \subset X$, $A$ is zero-dimensional.
|
||||
\item $\prod_{i \in I}X_i$ is zero-dimensional.
|
||||
\item $\bigsqcup_{i \in I}X_i$ is zero-dimensional.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
% Proof omitted.
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Cantor Space]
|
||||
\label{definition:cantor-space}
|
||||
Let $2 = \bracs{0, 1}$ be equipped with the discrete topology, then $2^{\natp}$ is the \textbf{Cantor space}.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Baire Space]
|
||||
\label{definition:the-baire-space}
|
||||
Let $\natp$ be equipped with the discrete topology, then $\mathscr{N} = (\natp)^{\natp}$ is the \textbf{Baire space}.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:baire-universality}
|
||||
Let $X$ be a non-empty Polish space, then there exists a surjective mapping $f \in C(\mathscr{N}; X)$.
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}[Proof, {{\cite[Proposition 8.2.7]{CohnMeasure}}}. ]
|
||||
Let $d: X^2 \to [0, \infty)$ be a complete metric on $X$. To construct the desired map, it is sufficient to construct $\bracsn{C(n_1, \cdots, n_N)| \bracsn{n_k}_1^N \subset \natp, N \in \natp} \subset 2^X$ such that:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\roman*)]
|
||||
\item For each $N \in \natp$, $\bracsn{n_k}_1^N \subset \natp$, $C(n_1, \cdots, n_N) \subset X$ is closed and non-empty.
|
||||
\item For each $N \in \natp$, $\bracsn{n_k}_1^N \subset \natp$, $\text{diam}(C(n_1, \cdots, n_N)) \le 1/N$.
|
||||
\item For each $N \in \natp$ and $\bracsn{n_k}_1^{N} \subset \natp$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
C(n_1, \cdots, n_{N}) = \bigcup_{n_{N+1} \in \natp}C(n_1, \cdots, n_{N+1})
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\item $X = \bigcup_{n_1 \in \natp}C(n_1)$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
Since $X$ is Polish, there exists a countable dense subset $\seq{x_k} \subset X$. For each $n_1 \in \natp$, let $C(n_1) = \ol{B(x_{n_1}, 1/2)}$, then $\bracsn{C(n_1)|n_1 \in \natp}$ satisfies (i) and (ii) by definition. As $\seq{x_k}$ is dense in $X$, $X = \bigcup_{n_1 \in \natp}C(n_1)$, and (iv) is also satisfied.
|
||||
|
||||
Let $N \in \natp$ and suppose inductively that $\bracsn{C(n_1, \cdots, n_k)| \bracsn{n_j}_1^k \subset \natp,1 \le k \le N}$ has been constructed to satisfy (i)-(iv) for each $1 \le k \le N$.
|
||||
|
||||
Fix $\bracsn{n_k}_1^N \subset \natp$. By \autoref{proposition:separable-metric-space}, there exists a countable dense subset $\seq{y_k} \subset C(n_1, \cdots, n_N)$. For each $n_{N+1} \in \natp$, let $C(n_1, \cdots, n_{N+1}) = \ol{B(y_{n_{N+1}}, 1/[2(N+1)])} \cap C(n_1, \cdots, n_N)$, then $\bracsn{C(n_1, \cdots, n_{N+1})|n_{N+1} \in \natp}$ satisfies (i) and (ii) by definition. Since $\seq{y_k}$ is dense in $C(n_1, \cdots, n_N)$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
C(n_1, \cdots, n_{N}) = \bigcup_{n_{N+1} \in \natp}C(n_1, \cdots, n_{N+1})
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
so (iii) is also satisfied.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, suppose that $\bracsn{C(n_1, \cdots, n_N)| \bracsn{n_k}_1^N \subset \natp, N \in \natp} \subset 2^X$ has been constructed to satisfy (i)-(iv). Since $X$ is complete, for each $\seq{n_k} \in \mathscr{N}$, there exists a unique $f(\seq{n_k}) \in X$ such that $\bracs{f(\seq{n_k})} = \bigcap_{N \in \natp}C(n_1, \cdots, n_N)$. For each $x \in X$, (iii) and (iv) imply that there exists $\seq{n_k} \in \mathscr{N}$ such that $x = f(\seq{n_k})$. As such, $f: \mathscr{N} \to X$ is a surjective mapping. For any $\seq{m_k}, \seq{n_k} \in \mathscr{N}$ and $N \in \natp$ with $m_k = n_k$ for each $1 \le k \le N$, $d(f(\seq{m_k}), f(\seq{n_k})) \le 1/N$. Therefore $f \in C(\mathscr{N}; X)$.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:cantor-universality}
|
||||
Let $X$ be a non-empty compact metrisable space, then there exists a surjective mapping $f \in C(2^{\natp}; X)$.
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Let $d: X \times X \to [0, \infty)$ be a metric on $X$. Since $X$ is compact, for each $N \in \natp$, there exists $K_N \in \natp$ and $\seqf{x_{N, k}|1 \le k \le K_N} \subset X$ such that $X = \bigcup_{k = 1}^{K_N}B(x_{N, k}, 1/N)$.
|
||||
|
||||
To construct the desired map, it is sufficient to construct
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\bracs{C(n_1, \cdots, n_N) \bigg | \bracsn{n_k}_1^N \in \prod_{n = 1}^{N}\bracs{1, \cdots, K_n}, N \in \natp} \subset 2^X
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
such that:
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}[label=(\roman*)]
|
||||
\item For each $N \in \natp$ and $\bracsn{n_k}_1^N$, $C(n_1, \cdots, n_N) \subset X$ is closed and non-empty.
|
||||
\item For each $N \in \natp$ and $\bracsn{n_k}_1^N$, $\text{diam}(C(n_1, \cdots, n_N)) \le 4/N$.
|
||||
\item For each $N \in \natp$ and $\bracsn{n_k}_1^{N}$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
C(n_1, \cdots, n_{N}) = \bigcup_{n_{N+1} = 1}^{K_{N+1}}C(n_1, \cdots, n_{N+1})
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\item $X = \bigcup_{n_1 = 1}^{K_1}C(n_1)$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
|
||||
For each $1 \le n_1 \le K_1$, let $C(n_1) = \ol{B(x_{1, n_1}, 1)}$, then $\bracsn{C(n_1)|1 \le n_1 \le K_1}$ satisfies (i), (ii), and (iv) by definition.
|
||||
|
||||
Let $N \in \natp$ and suppose inductively that
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\bracs{C(n_1, \cdots, n_K) \bigg | \bracsn{n_k}_1^K \in \prod_{n = 1}^{K}\bracs{1, \cdots, K_n}, 1 \le K \le N} \subset 2^X
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
has been constructed to satisfy (i)-(iv) for each $1 \le K \le N$. Fix $\bracsn{n_k}_1^N \in \prod_{n = 1}^{N}\bracs{1, \cdots, K_n}$. Since $X = \bigcup_{k = 1}^{K_{N+1}}B(x_{N+1, k}, 1/(N+1))$, there exists $\bracsn{y_k}_1^{K_{N+1}} \subset C(n_1, \cdots, n_N)$ such that $C(n_1, \cdots, n_N) \subset \bigcup_{k = 1}^{K_{N+1}}B(y_k, 2/(N+1))$. For each $1 \le n_{N+1} \le K_{N+1}$, let $C(n_1, \cdots, n_{N+1}) = C(n_1, \cdots, n_N) \cap \ol{B(y_{n_{N+1}}, 2/(N+1))}$, then $\bracsn{C(n_1, \cdots, n_{N+1})|1 \le n_{N+1} \le K_{N+1}}$ satisfies (i)-(iii).
|
||||
|
||||
Now, suppose that
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\bracs{C(n_1, \cdots, n_N) \bigg | \bracsn{n_k}_1^N \in \prod_{n = 1}^{N}\bracs{1, \cdots, K_n}, N \in \natp} \subset 2^X
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
has been constructed to satisfy (i)-(iv). Since $X$ is complete, for each $\seq{n_k} \in \prod_{n \in \natp}\bracs{1, \cdots, K_n}$, there exists a unique $f(\seq{n_k}) \in X$ such that $\bracs{f(\seq{n_k})} = \bigcap_{N \in \natp}C(n_1, \cdots, n_N)$. For each $x \in X$, (iii) and (iv) imply that there exists $\seq{n_k} \in \prod_{n \in \natp}\bracs{1, \cdots, K_n}$ such that $x = f(\seq{n_k})$. As such, $f: \prod_{n \in \natp}\bracs{1, \cdots, K_n} \to X$ is a surjective mapping. For any $\seq{m_k}, \seq{n_k} \in \prod_{n \in \natp}\bracs{1, \cdots, K_n}$ and $N \in \natp$ with $m_k = n_k$ for each $1 \le k \le N$, $d(f(\seq{m_k}), f(\seq{n_k})) \le 4/N$. Therefore $f \in C(\prod_{n \in \natp}\bracs{1, \cdots, K_n}; X)$.
|
||||
|
||||
Finally, for each $n \in \natp$, there exists $L_n \in \natp$ and a surjective mapping $g_n: 2^{L_n} \to \bracs{1, \cdots, K_n}$. Let
|
||||
\[
|
||||
g = \prod_{n \in \natp}g_n: \prod_{n \in \natp}2^{L_n} \to \prod_{n \in \natp}\bracs{1, \cdots, K_n}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
be the product of $\seq{g_n}$, then $g \in C(\prod_{n \in \natp}2^{L_n}; \prod_{n \in \natp}\bracs{1, \cdots, K_n})$, and
|
||||
\[
|
||||
f \circ g: 2^{\natp} \iso \prod_{n \in \natp}2^{L_n} \to X
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
is the desired continuous surjection.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user