Updated the separable dual proposition.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,22 +3,26 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:separable-dual}
|
||||
Let $E$ be a separable normed vector space, then $E^*$ is separable with respect to the weak*-topology.
|
||||
Let $K \in \RC$ and $\dpn{E, F}{\lambda}$ be a duality of normed vector spaces over $K$ with $E$ being separable, then
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item The closed unit ball $S = \bracsn{y \in F|\ \norm{y}_{F} \le 1}$ is separable with respect to the $\sigma(F, E)$-topology.
|
||||
\item If the duality is norming, then there exists $\seq{y_n} \subset F$ such that for each $x \in E$, $\norm{x}_E = \sup_{n \in \natp}\dpn{x, y_n}{\lambda}$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Let $\seq{x_n} \subset E$ be a dense subset and $S = \bracsn{\phi \in E^*| \norm{\phi}_{E^*} \le 1}$. For each $N \in \natp$, let
|
||||
Let $\seq{x_n} \subset E$ be a dense subset. For each $N \in \natp$, let
|
||||
\[
|
||||
T_N: S \to \real^N \quad \phi \mapsto (\dpn{x_1, \phi}{E}, \cdots, \dpn{x_N, \phi}{E})
|
||||
T_N: S \to \real^N \quad y \mapsto (\dpn{x_1, y}{E}, \cdots, \dpn{x_N, y}{E})
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
Since $\real^N$ is separable, $T_N(S)$ is separable by \autoref{proposition:separable-metric-space}. Thus there exists $\bracs{\phi_{N, k}}_{k = 1}^\infty \subset S$ such that $\bracs{T_N\phi_{N, k}}_{k = 1}^\infty$ is dense in $T_N(S)$.
|
||||
Since $\real^N$ is separable, $T_N(S)$ is separable by \autoref{proposition:separable-metric-space}. Thus there exists $\bracs{y_{N, k}}_{k = 1}^\infty \subset S$ such that $\bracs{T_Ny_{N, k}}_{k = 1}^\infty$ is dense in $T_N(S)$.
|
||||
|
||||
Let $\phi \in S$, then for each $N \in \natp$, there exists $k_N \in \natp$ such that for each $1 \le n \le N$,
|
||||
Let $y \in S$, then for each $N \in \natp$, there exists $k_N \in \natp$ such that for each $1 \le n \le N$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
|\dpn{x_n, \phi_{N, k_N}}{E} - \dpn{x_n, \phi}{E}| \le \frac{1}{N}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
Thus for each $N \in \natp$, $\dpn{x_n, \phi_{N, k_N}}{E} \to \dpn{x_n, \phi}{E}$ as $N \to \infty$. Since $\phi_{N, k_N} \to \phi$ pointwise on a dense subset of $E$, and $\bracsn{\phi_{N, k_N}|N \in \natp} \subset S$ is uniformly equicontinuous, $\phi_{N, k_N} \to \phi$ in the weak*-topology by \autoref{proposition:strong-operator-dense}.
|
||||
Thus for each $N \in \natp$, $\dpn{x_n, y_{N, k_N}}{E} \to \dpn{x_n, y}{E}$ as $N \to \infty$. Since $\phi_{N, k_N} \to \phi$ pointwise on a dense subset of $E$, and $\bracsn{y_{N, k_N}|N \in \natp} \subset S$ is uniformly equicontinuous, $\phi_{N, k_N} \to \phi$ in the $\sigma(F, E)$-topology by \autoref{proposition:strong-operator-dense}.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user