Added Riemann's rearrangement theorem.
This commit is contained in:
11
preamble.sty
11
preamble.sty
@@ -8,12 +8,13 @@
|
||||
|
||||
% ------------- Block Environmets ---------------
|
||||
|
||||
\newtheorem{theorem}[subsection]{Theorem}
|
||||
\newtheorem{proposition}[subsection]{Proposition}
|
||||
\newtheorem{lemma}[subsection]{Lemma}
|
||||
\newtheorem{theorem}{Theorem}[section]
|
||||
\newtheorem{proposition}[theorem]{Proposition}
|
||||
\newtheorem{corollary}[theorem]{Corollary}
|
||||
\newtheorem{lemma}[theorem]{Lemma}
|
||||
|
||||
\newtheorem{definition}[subsection]{Definition}
|
||||
\newtheorem{example}[subsection]{Example}
|
||||
\newtheorem{definition}[theorem]{Definition}
|
||||
\newtheorem{example}[theorem]{Example}
|
||||
% \newtheorem{exercise}[subsection]{Exercise}
|
||||
% \newtheorem{situation}[subsection]{Situation}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
109
src/fa/norm/absolute.tex
Normal file
109
src/fa/norm/absolute.tex
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,109 @@
|
||||
\section{Conditional and Absolute Convergence}
|
||||
\label{section:conditional-absolute-convergence}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Absolute Convergence]
|
||||
\label{definition:absolute-convergence}
|
||||
Let $E$ be a normed space, then a series $\sum_{n = 1}^\infty x_n$ with $\seq{x_n} \subset E$ \textbf{converges absolutely} if $\sum_{n \in \natp}\norm{x_n}_E < \infty$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Unconditional Convergence]
|
||||
\label{definition:unconditional-convergence}
|
||||
Let $E$ be a normed space, then a series $\sum_{n = 1}^\infty x_n$ with $\seq{x_n} \subset E$ \textbf{converges unconditionally} if for any bijection $\sigma: \natp \to \natp$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\sum_{n = 1}^\infty x_n = \sum_{n = 1}^\infty x_{\sigma(n)}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{theorem}[Riemann's Rearrangement Theorem]
|
||||
\label{theorem:riemann-rearrangement}
|
||||
Let $\seq{x_n} \subset \real$ and $N = P \sqcup N$ such that $x_n \ge 0$ for all $n \in P$ and $x_n \le 0$ for all $n \in N$, then
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item If $\sum_{n \in P}x_n = \infty$ and $\sum_{n \in N}x_n = -\infty$, then there exists bijections $\sigma, \tau: \natp \to \natp$ such that
|
||||
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\sum_{n = 1}^\infty x_{\sigma(n)} = \infty \quad \sum_{n = 1}^\infty x_{\tau(n)} = -\infty
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
\item If $\sum_{n \in P}x_n = \infty$, $\sum_{n \in N}x_n = -\infty$, and $\sum_{n =1}^\infty x_n$ converges, then for any $x \in \ol{\real}$, there exists a bijection $\sigma: \natp \to \natp$ such that $\sum_{n = 1}^\infty x_{\sigma(n)} = x$.
|
||||
\item If $\sum_{n \in P}x_n = \infty$ but $\sum_{n \in N}x_n > -\infty$, then $\sum_{n = 1}^\infty x_n$ converges to $\infty$ unconditionally.
|
||||
\item If $\sum_{n \in N}x_n = -\infty$ but $\sum_{n \in P}x_n < \infty$, then $\sum_{n = 1}^\infty x_n$ converges to $-\infty$ unconditionally.
|
||||
\item If $\sum_{n \in \natp}|x_n| < \infty$, then $\sum_{n = 1}^\infty x_n$ converges unconditionally.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
In other words, a series in $\real$ converges unconditionally if and only if its positive parts or its negative parts are finite.
|
||||
\end{theorem}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
By inserting zeroes, assume without loss of generality that $P$ and $N$ are both infinite. Let $\seq{p_k} = P$ be an enumeration of $P$ and $\seq{n_k} = N$ be an enumeration of $N$.
|
||||
|
||||
(1): By taking $\sum_{n \in P}-x_n$, assume without loss of generality that $\sum_{n \in P}x_n = \infty$.
|
||||
|
||||
Let $k_0 = 0$. Let $n \in \natp$ and suppose inductively that $k_n$ has been constructed such that
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\sum_{k = 1}^{k_n}x_{p_k} + \sum_{j = 1}^n x_{n_j} \ge n
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
Since $\sum_{n \in \natp}p_n = \infty$, there exists $k_{n+1} \in \natp$ such that $\sum_{k = k_{n}+1}^{k_{n+1}}x_{p_k} \ge x_{n_{n+1}} + 1$.
|
||||
|
||||
Therefore there exists $\bracs{k_n}_1^K \subset \natp$ such that
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\sum_{k = 1}^{k_n}x_{p_k} + \sum_{j = 1}^n x_{n_j} \ge n
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
for all $1 \le n < K$. In which case, if $\sigma: \natp \to \natp$ is defined by
|
||||
\[
|
||||
(p_1, \cdots, p_{k_1}, n_1, p_1, \cdots, p_{k_2}, n_2, \cdots)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
Let $n \in \natp$, then for any $K \ge k_{n} + n$, $\sum_{k = 1}^K x_{\sigma(k)} \ge n$, so $\sum_{k = 1}^\infty x_{\sigma(k)} = \infty$.
|
||||
|
||||
(2): Assume without loss of generality that $x > 0$. Define $m_0 = 0$ and $n_0 = 0$. Let $n \in \natz$. If $n \ge 1$, suppose inductively that $m_n, n_n \in \natp$ has been constructed such that
|
||||
\[
|
||||
x < \sum_{k = 1}^{m_{n}}x_{p_k} + \sum_{k = 1}^{n_{-1}}x_{n_k} < x + x_{m_{n}}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
and
|
||||
\[
|
||||
x + x_{n_n} < \sum_{k = 1}^{m_n}x_{p_k} + \sum_{k = 1}^{n_n}x_{n_k} < x
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
Since $\sum_{k \in \natp}x_{p_k} = \infty$, there exists $m_{n+1} > m_n$ such that
|
||||
\[
|
||||
x < \sum_{k = 1}^{m_{n+1}}x_{p_k} + \sum_{k = 1}^{n_n}x_{n_k} < x + x_{m_{n+1}}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
As $\sum_{k \in \natp}x_{n_k} = -\infty$, there exists $n_{n+1} > n_n$ such that
|
||||
\[
|
||||
x + x_{n_{n+1}} < \sum_{k = 1}^{m_{n+1}}x_{p_k} + \sum_{k = 1}^{n_{n+1}}x_{n_k} < x
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
Let $\sigma: \natp \to \natp$ be defined by
|
||||
\[
|
||||
(p_1, \cdots, p_{m_1}, n_{1}, \cdots, n_{n_1}, p_{m_1 + 1}, \cdots, p_{m_2}, \cdots)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
then for any $K \in [m_n + n_n, m_{n+1} + n_{n+1}]$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
x + x_{n_n} + x_{n_{n+1}} \le \sum_{k = 1}^K x_{\sigma(k)} \le x + x_{p_{n+1}}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
Since $x_n \to 0$ as $n \to \infty$, $\sum_{k = 1}^K x_{\sigma(k)} \to x$ as $K \to \infty$.
|
||||
|
||||
(3): Let $\sigma: \natp \to \natp$ be a bijection and $\alpha > 0$, then there exists $K \in \natp$ such that $\sum_{k = 1}^K x_{p_k} > \alpha - \sum_{k \in \natp}x_{n_k}$. Since $\sigma$ is a bijection, there exists $K' \in \natp$ such that $\sigma([1, K']) \supset \bracs{p_k|1 \le k \le K}$. In which case, for any $k \ge K'$,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\sum_{j = 1}^k x_{\sigma(j)} \ge \sum_{j = 1}^K x_{p_k} + \sum_{k \in \natp}x_{n_k} > \alpha
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
(4): By applying (3) to $\sum_{n = 1}^\infty -x_n$.
|
||||
|
||||
(5): Let $\sigma: \natp \to \natp$ be a bijection, then for any $N \in \natp$, there exists $K \in \natp$ such that $\sigma([1, K]) \supset [1, N]$. In which case,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\abs{\sum_{n = 1}^N x_n - \sum_{n = 1}^K x_{\sigma(n)}} \le \sum_{n > N}|x_n|
|
||||
\]
|
||||
|
||||
so
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\sum_{n = 1}^\infty x_n = \sum_{n = 1}^\infty x_{\sigma(n)}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
|
||||
@@ -2,5 +2,6 @@
|
||||
\label{chap:normed-spaces}
|
||||
|
||||
\input{./normed.tex}
|
||||
\input{./absolute.tex}
|
||||
\input{./linear.tex}
|
||||
\input{./multilinear.tex}
|
||||
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user