From 10e520dff3bfecb5fc1af3cd9b92fd5a170ca852 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001 From: Bokuan Li Date: Fri, 1 May 2026 16:40:01 -0400 Subject: [PATCH] Updated formulation in BV. --- src/fa/rs/bv.tex | 22 +++++++++------------- 1 file changed, 9 insertions(+), 13 deletions(-) diff --git a/src/fa/rs/bv.tex b/src/fa/rs/bv.tex index 34b00c1..e6ca5db 100644 --- a/src/fa/rs/bv.tex +++ b/src/fa/rs/bv.tex @@ -65,12 +65,7 @@ \begin{enumerate} \item $BV([a, b]; E)$ is a vector space. \item For each continuous seminorm $\rho$ on $E$, $[\cdot]_{\text{var}, \rho}$ is a seminorm on $BV([a, b]; E)$. - \item Let $\fF$ be a filter on $BV([a, b]; E)$ and $f: [a, b] \to E$. If - \begin{enumerate}[label=\alph*] - \item $\pi_x(\fF) \to f(x)$ for all $x \in [a, b]$. - \item For every continuous seminorm $\rho$ on $E$, there exists $U \in \fF$ such that $\sup_{g \in U}[g]_{\text{var}, \rho} = M_\rho < \infty$. - \end{enumerate} - then $f \in BV([a, b]; E)$ with $[f]_{\text{var}, \rho} \le M_\rho$. + \item For each continuous seminorm $\rho$ on $E$ and $M > 0$, $\bracs{[\cdot]_{\text{var}, \rho} \le M} \subset E^{[a, b]}$ is closed. \item For any $f \in BV([a, b]; E)$ and continuous seminorm $\rho$ on $E$, $\sup_{x \in [a, b]}\rho(f(x)) \le \rho(f(a)) + [f]_{\text{var}, \rho}$. \end{enumerate} If $(E, \norm{\cdot}_E)$ is a normed vector space, then @@ -79,14 +74,15 @@ \end{enumerate} \end{definition} \begin{proof}[Proof {{\cite[Proposition X.1.1]{Lang}}}. ] - (3): Let $\rho$ be a continuous seminorm on $E$ and $P \in \scp([a, b])$, then by assumption (a), - \[ - V_{\rho, P}(f) = \sum_{j = 1}^n \rho(f(x_j) - f(x_{j - 1})) - = \lim_{g, \fF}\sum_{j = 1}^n \rho(g(x_j) - g(x_{j - 1})) - = \lim_{g \in \fF}V_{\rho, P}(g) - \] + (3): Let $\rho$ be a continuous seminorm on $E$, $P = \seqf{x_j} \in \scp([a, b])$, and $f \in \overline{\bracs{[\cdot]_{\text{var}, \rho} \le M}}$. For any $\eps > 0$, there exists $g \in \bracs{[\cdot]_{\text{var}, \rho} \le M}$ such that $\rho(f(x_j) - g(x_j)) < \eps$ for each $1 \le j \le n$. In which case, + \begin{align*} + V_{\rho, P}(f) &= \sum_{j = 1}^n \rho(f(x_j) - f(x_{j - 1})) \\ + &\le 2n\eps + \sum_{j = 1}^n \rho(g(x_j) - g(x_{j - 1})) \\ + &\le V_{\rho, P}(g) + 2n\eps \le M + 2n\eps + \end{align*} + - By assumption (b), $[0, M_\rho]$ is in the filter generated by $V_{\rho, P}(\fF)$. Thus $V_{\rho, P}(f) \le M_\rho$. As this holds for all $P \in \scp([a, b])$, $V_{\rho, P}(f) \le M_\rho$, and $f \in BV([a, b]; E)$. + As the above holds for all $\eps > 0$, $V_{\rho, P}(f) \le M$. Since this holds for all $P \in \scp([a, b])$, $[f]_{\text{var}, \rho} \le M$. (5): For each $n \in \nat^+$, let \[