Added the Mean Value Theorem.

src/fa/tvs/definition.tex

@@ -202,3 +202,12 @@
 
     (Uniqueness): Let $\mathcal{S} \subset 2^E$ be a topology on $E$ satisfying (1) and (2), then for each $x \in E$, $\cn_{(E, \mathcal{S})}(x) = \cn_{(E, \mathcal{T})}(x)$. By \ref{proposition:neighbourhoodcharacteristic}, $\mathcal{S} = \mathcal{T}$.
 \end{proof}
+
+
+\begin{proposition}
+\label{proposition:tvs-locally-connected}
+    Let $E$ be a TVS over $K \in \RC$, then $E$ is locally connected.
+\end{proposition}
+\begin{proof}
+    Let $U \in \cn(0)$ be radial, then for any $y \in U$, the mapping $t \mapsto ty$ is a path from $0$ to $y$ contained in $U$. Thus $U$ is path-connected. By \ref{proposition:tvs-0-neighbourhood-base}, the radial neighbourhoods of $0$ forms a fundamental system of neighbourhoods, so the path-connected neighbourhoods of $0$ forms a fundamental system as well.
+\end{proof}

src/fa/tvs/spaces-of-linear.tex

@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
 
 \begin{definition}[Space of Bounded Linear Maps]
 \label{definition:bounded-linear-map-space}
-    Let $E, F$ be TVSs over $K \in \RC$, $\mathfrak{S} \subset 2^E$ be an upward-directed system, and $k \in \nat$. The space $L_{\mathfrak{S}}^k(E; F)$ is the set of all $k$-linear maps $T: E^k \to F$ with $T(S^k) \in B(F)$ for all $S \in \mathfrak{S}$, equipped with the $\bracsn{S^k| S \in \mathfrak{S}}$-uniform topology.
+    Let $E, F$ be TVSs over $K \in \RC$, $\mathfrak{S} \subset 2^E$ be an upward-directed system, and $k \in \nat$. The space $B_{\mathfrak{S}}^k(E; F)$ is the set of all $k$-linear maps $T: E^k \to F$ with $T(S^k) \in B(F)$ for all $S \in \mathfrak{S}$, equipped with the $\bracsn{S^k| S \in \mathfrak{S}}$-uniform topology.
 \end{definition}
 
 \begin{proposition}
@@ -48,7 +48,7 @@
 	\begin{enumerate}
         \item The map
         \[
-        I: L_{\mathfrak{S}}^k(E; L_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)) \to L^{k+1}_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)
+        I: B_{\mathfrak{S}}^k(E; B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)) \to B^{k+1}_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)
         \]
         defined by
         \[
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
         is an isomorphism.
         \item The map
         \[
-        I: \underbrace{L_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; L_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; \cdots)))}_{k \text{ times}} \to L^k_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)
+        I: \underbrace{B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; \cdots)))}_{k \text{ times}} \to B^k_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)
         \]
         defined by
         \[
@@ -67,30 +67,30 @@
     \end{enumerate}
     which allows the identification
     \[
-    \underbrace{L_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; L_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; \cdots)))}_{k \text{ times}} = L^k_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)
+    \underbrace{B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; \cdots)))}_{k \text{ times}} = B^k_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)
     \]
     under the map $I$ in (2).
 \end{proposition}
 \begin{proof}
-    (1): To see that $I$ is surjective, let $T \in L_{\mathfrak{S}}^{k+1}(E; F)$ and
+    (1): To see that $I$ is surjective, let $T \in B_{\mathfrak{S}}^{k+1}(E; F)$ and
     \[
-    I^{-1}T: E \to L_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F) \quad x \mapsto T(x, \cdot)
+    I^{-1}T: E \to B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F) \quad x \mapsto T(x, \cdot)
     \]
     Let $(x_1, \cdots, x_k) \in E^k$ and $S \in \mathfrak{S}$. Since $\mathfrak{S}$ is upward-directed and contains all singletons, assume without loss of generality that $\bracsn{x_j}_1^k \subset S$. In which case,
     \[
     T(x_1, \cdots, x_k, S) \subset T(S^{k+1}) \in B(F)
     \]
-    by assumption. Thus $I^{-1}T(x_1, \cdots, x_k) \in L_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)$.
+    by assumption. Thus $I^{-1}T(x_1, \cdots, x_k) \in B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)$.
 
-    In addition, for any $S_1 \in \mathfrak{S}$ and entourage $E(S_2, U)$ of $L_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)$ where $S_2 \in \mathfrak{S}$ and $U$ is an entourage of $F$, there exists $S \in \mathfrak{S}$ with $S \supset S_1 \cup S_2$. Given that $T(S^{k+1}) \in B(F)$, there exists $\lambda > 0$ such that $T(S^{k+1}) \subset \lambda U(0)$. In which case, $I^{-1}T(S^k) \subset \lambda E(S, U)(0)$ and $I^{-1}T(S^k) \in B(L_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F))$. Thus $I^{-1}T \in L^k_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; L_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F))$.
+    In addition, for any $S_1 \in \mathfrak{S}$ and entourage $E(S_2, U)$ of $B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)$ where $S_2 \in \mathfrak{S}$ and $U$ is an entourage of $F$, there exists $S \in \mathfrak{S}$ with $S \supset S_1 \cup S_2$. Given that $T(S^{k+1}) \in B(F)$, there exists $\lambda > 0$ such that $T(S^{k+1}) \subset \lambda U(0)$. In which case, $I^{-1}T(S^k) \subset \lambda E(S, U)(0)$ and $I^{-1}T(S^k) \in B(B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F))$. Thus $I^{-1}T \in B^k_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F))$.
 
     It remains to show that $I$ and $I^{-1}$ is continuous. To this end, let $S \in \mathfrak{S}$ and $U$ be an entourage of $F$, then for any $T \in E(S^k, E(S, U))(0)$, $IT \in E(S^{k+1}, U)(0)$, so $I$ is continuous.
 
-    On the other hand, let $S_1 \in \mathfrak{S}$ and $E(S_2, U)$ be an entourage of $L_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)$ where $S_2 \in \mathfrak{S}$ and $U$ is an entourage of $F$. Let $S \in \mathfrak{S}$ with $S \supset S_1 \cup S_2$, then for any $T \in E(S^{k+1}, U)(0)$, $I^{-1}T \in E(S^{k}, E(S, U))(0)$. Thus $I^{-1}$ is continuous as well.
+    On the other hand, let $S_1 \in \mathfrak{S}$ and $E(S_2, U)$ be an entourage of $B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)$ where $S_2 \in \mathfrak{S}$ and $U$ is an entourage of $F$. Let $S \in \mathfrak{S}$ with $S \supset S_1 \cup S_2$, then for any $T \in E(S^{k+1}, U)(0)$, $I^{-1}T \in E(S^{k}, E(S, U))(0)$. Thus $I^{-1}$ is continuous as well.
 
     (2): The case for $k = 2$ is given by (1). If the proposition holds for $k \in \natp$, then
     \[
-    \underbrace{L_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; L_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; \cdots)))}_{k+1 \text{ times}} = L^k_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; L_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)) = L^{k+1}_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)
+    \underbrace{B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; \cdots)))}_{k+1 \text{ times}} = B^k_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; B_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)) = B^{k+1}_{\mathfrak{S}}(E; F)
     \]
     Thus (2) holds for all $k \in \natp$.
 \end{proof}