Added pseudonorms for TVSs.
This commit is contained in:
@@ -3,3 +3,4 @@
|
||||
|
||||
\input{./src/cat/cat/index.tex}
|
||||
\input{./src/cat/gluing/index.tex}
|
||||
\input{./src/cat/tricks/index.tex}
|
||||
|
||||
62
src/cat/tricks/dyadic.tex
Normal file
62
src/cat/tricks/dyadic.tex
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,62 @@
|
||||
\section{Dyadic Rational Numbers}
|
||||
\label{section:dyadic}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Dyadic Rational Number]
|
||||
\label{definition:dyadic}
|
||||
Let $x \in \rational$, then $x$ is a \textbf{dyadic rational number} if there exists $n \in \natp$ and $k \in \nat$ such that $x = k/2^{-n}$.
|
||||
|
||||
For each $n \in \natp$, denote $\mathbb{D}_n = \bracs{k/2^{-n}|k \in \integer}$. The set $\mathbb{D} = \bigcup_{n \in \natp}\mathbb{D}_n$ is the collection of all dyadic rational numbers.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{definition}[Rank]
|
||||
\label{definition:dyadic-rank}
|
||||
Let $q \in \mathbb{D}$, then
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\text{rk}(q) = \min\bracs{n \in \natp|x \in \mathbb{D}_n}
|
||||
\]
|
||||
is the \textbf{dyadic rank} of $q$.
|
||||
\end{definition}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{lemma}
|
||||
\label{lemma:dyadic-decompose}
|
||||
Let $x \in \mathbb{D}$ with $n = \text{rk}(x) > 1$, then there exists a unique $y \in \mathbb{D}_{n - 1}$ such that $x = y + 2^{-n}$.
|
||||
\end{lemma}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Since $x \in \mathbb{D}_n$, there exists a unique $k \in \integer$ such that $x = k/2^{-n}$. Given that $x \not\in \mathbb{D}_{n-1}$, $k$ is odd. Therefore $y = (k - 1)/2^{-n}$ is the unique element of $\mathbb{D}_{n - 1}$ with $x = y + 2^{-n}$.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:dyadic-subset}
|
||||
Let $x \in \mathbb{D} \cap [0, 1)$, then there exists a unique $M(x) \subset \natp \cap [1, \text{rk}(x)]$ such that $x = \sum_{n \in M(x)}2^{-n}$.
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
First suppose that $\text{rk}(x) = 1$. In which case, $x \in \bracs{0, 1/2}$, and either $M(x) = \emptyset$ or $M(y) = \bracs{1}$.
|
||||
|
||||
Assume inductively that the proposition holds for all dyadic rationals of rank $n$. Let $x \in \mathbb{D}_{n+1} \setminus \mathbb{D}_n$. By \ref{lemma:dyadic-decompose}, there exists a unique $y \in \mathbb{D}_n$ such that $x = y + 2^{-n-1}$. Since $x > 0$, $x \ge 1/2^{-n-1}$, so $y \in [0, 1)$. By the inductive assumption, there exists a unique $M(y) \subset \natp \cap [1, n]$ such that $y = \sum_{k \in M(y)}2^{-k}$. In which case, $M(x) = M(y) \cup \bracs{n}$ is the desired set.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
|
||||
\begin{proposition}
|
||||
\label{proposition:dyadic-semigroup-order}
|
||||
Let $G$ be a commutative ordered semigroup, and $\seq{g_n} \subset G$ such that for each $n \in \natp$, $g_{n+1} + g_{n+1} \le g_n$. For each $x \in \mathbb{D} \cap [0, 1)$, let $\phi(x) = \sum_{n \in M(x)}g_n$, then
|
||||
\begin{enumerate}
|
||||
\item For any $x, y \in \mathbb{D} \cap [0, 1)$ such that $x + y \in [0, 1)$, $\phi(x) + \phi(y) \le \phi(x + y)$.
|
||||
\item For any $x, y \in \mathbb{D} \cap [0, 1)$ with $x \le y$, $\phi(x) \le \phi(y)$.
|
||||
\end{enumerate}
|
||||
\end{proposition}
|
||||
\begin{proof}
|
||||
Assume without loss of generality that $x, y \in (0, 1)$. First suppose that $\text{rk}(x) = 2$ and $\text{rk}(y) \le 2$. In which case, since $G$ is commutative, it is sufficient to consider two cases: $(x, y) = (1/4, 1/4)$ and $(x, y) \in (1/2, 1/4)$. In the first case,
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\phi(x) + \phi(y) = g_2 + g_2 \le g_1 = \phi(x + y)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
In the second, $\phi(x) + \phi(y) = \phi(x + y)$.
|
||||
|
||||
Now assume inductively that the proposition holds for all $x, y \in \mathbb{D} \cap (0, 1)$ with $\text{rk}(x) = n$ and $\text{rk}(y) \le n$. Let $x \in \mathbb{D}_{n+1} \setminus \mathbb{D}_n$ and $y \in \mathbb{D}_{n+1}$. By \ref{lemma:dyadic-decompose}, there exists $x_0 \in \mathbb{D}_n$ such that $x = x_0 + 2^{-n-1}$. If $y \in \mathbb{D}_n$, then
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\phi(x) + \phi(y) = \phi(x_0) + \phi(y) + g_{n+1} \le \phi(x_0 + y) + g_{n+1} = \phi(x + y)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
by the inductive assumption. Otherwise, there exists $y_0 \in \mathbb{D}_n$ such that $y = y_0 + 2^{-n-1}$, so
|
||||
\[
|
||||
\phi(x) + \phi(y) \le \phi(x_0) + \phi(y_0) + g_n = \phi(x_0) + \phi(y_0) + \phi(2^{-n}) \le \phi(x + y)
|
||||
\]
|
||||
by the inductive assumption.
|
||||
\end{proof}
|
||||
4
src/cat/tricks/index.tex
Normal file
4
src/cat/tricks/index.tex
Normal file
@@ -0,0 +1,4 @@
|
||||
\chapter{Inequalities and Computations}
|
||||
\label{chap:tricks}
|
||||
|
||||
\input{./src/cat/tricks/dyadic.tex}
|
||||
Reference in New Issue
Block a user